I submit to none. I will contract or trade. But submission is for animals. I am man. 😉
(you haven’t got a chance, so you shouldnt try)
Reply addressees: @DikRahl @jamesfoxhiggins
Theme: Agency
-
I submit to none. I will contract or trade. But submission is for animals. I am
-
You mean, my dozen companies, retiring early to work on politics full time, my c
You mean, my dozen companies, retiring early to work on politics full time, my completion of the scientific method with solution to the social sciences and law, and building an intellectual and political movement from scratch?
You’d be surprised at our reach.
Millions…
😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-05 14:50:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1268918084355702785
Reply addressees: @JohannShultz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1268912846747779072
-
You mean, my dozen companies, retiring early to work on politics full time, my c
You mean, my dozen companies, retiring early to work on politics full time, my completion of the scientific method with solution to the social sciences and law, and building an intellectual and political movement from scratch?
You’d be surprised at our reach.
Millions…
😉
Reply addressees: @JohannShultz -
I am exceptionally good at what I do. Which is anything I choose to do. Welcome
I am exceptionally good at what I do.
Which is anything I choose to do.
Welcome to Childhood’s End
Reply addressees: @JohannShultz -
I am exceptionally good at what I do. Which is anything I choose to do. Welcome
I am exceptionally good at what I do.
Which is anything I choose to do.
Welcome to Childhood’s End
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-05 14:47:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1268917463267360768
Reply addressees: @JohannShultz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1268913761999450112
-
I do science and data. Very, very few people have agency, and fewer have suffici
I do science and data. Very, very few people have agency, and fewer have sufficient knowledge. Scales: reaction > Intuition > reason > calculation, > computation. Myth > History > Law > Economics > Science > mathematics. We are capable of Graceful Improvement and ‘failure’.
Reply addressees: @RooseveltIslan1 @_ReaalAmerican_ @realDonaldTrump -
I do science and data. Very, very few people have agency, and fewer have suffici
I do science and data. Very, very few people have agency, and fewer have sufficient knowledge. Scales: reaction > Intuition > reason > calculation, > computation. Myth > History > Law > Economics > Science > mathematics. We are capable of Graceful Improvement and ‘failure’.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-05 12:53:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1268888568468037632
Reply addressees: @RooseveltIslan1 @_ReaalAmerican_ @realDonaldTrump
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1268885292158799872
-
You are not knowledgeable enough to have this conversation with me. Few are. Ins
You are not knowledgeable enough to have this conversation with me. Few are. Instead you are seeking psychological comfort by false promise of comprehension and agency – like any normal human being would.
The weakness in our system if financialization and it’s easily solved.
Reply addressees: @Elbanna201 -
You are not knowledgeable enough to have this conversation with me. Few are. Ins
You are not knowledgeable enough to have this conversation with me. Few are. Instead you are seeking psychological comfort by false promise of comprehension and agency – like any normal human being would.
The weakness in our system if financialization and it’s easily solved.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-05 12:06:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1268876964577841152
Reply addressees: @Elbanna201
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1268875701861724163
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Elbanna201 So either you’re solving for stagnation (non-adaptation) or you don’t comprehend innovation, economics, evolution, or both.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1268875701861724163
-
I don’t think you understand how stupid that question is. 😉 Color of skin, ches
I don’t think you understand how stupid that question is. 😉
Color of skin, chest size, body language, facial expression, dress, hygiene, vocabulary, and pronunciation predict behavior. Likely = Probability. Probability is ‘yes, dramatically so’.
Reply addressees: @LCasey91 @DanishPastry11 @_ReaalAmerican_ @realDonaldTrump