Theme: Agency

—“P is here for Curt. Curt is not here for P. He has no intent to “win.” His goal is to preserve a comfortable circle of “Yes-men” and expand that when possible, that’s why he keeps genuinely intelligent supporters at arms-length. What appears to be marketing issues are in actuality (probably subconscious) self-sabotage to maintain control. I discovered P through high-intelligence mutuals, including James. I remain surprised at how some have seemingly bought into what appears to be just the attention-seeking behavior of a poorly socialized histrionic narcissist.”— Gideon Green.

Interesting. Another criticism of me. Not of the work on P, the constitution that results, the explanation of European civilization – or of the strategy for restoring it by revolution. But this is what I expect of the right. And the ‘presumption of equality’ that is endemic to western civilization – a presumption I don’t make, and like Nietzsche or the Ancients, actively deny. Everyone want’s wooing (Christian feminine right), consent (martial male right), and I’m just ‘telling’ y’all how it is and expecting you to deal with it. Because that’s what judges do. I’m doing my job in my role. And I don’t much care about your opinion really. I only care that you don’t fail and take the civilization down with you.

As for yes men, I ignore the yes men as merely signaling loyalty even if they don’t understand more than that we’re on their side. I also know that rejecting them turns them into rabid enemies and sometimes stalkers. So loyalty given is always best returned, even at the expense of bearing the cacophony of their signals.

All that matters is that I get the research feedback on my core work. That’s the point of doing work in public. Its so that I don’t have to pay endless and expensive research fees to run experiments. I learn by figthing. But figthing what helps me learn. Not what others want me to learn. 😉

I’ve pivoted and reformed myself and my work about every eighteen months, as we’ve grown. It’s called evolution. John’s experiment with dumbing-it-down for the dissident right was enough to signal that we had answers others didn’t.

But having to launch early beacuse of timing, covid, soros-antifa-blm, and the democratic attempt to keep biden out of the public eye, without educating the right first … well, it failed because I presumed what we were doing was obvious – and it wasn’t.

And we discovered that the christians most of all want wooing for doing nothing, and the WN/NS want wooing so that they can have a rumble, and normies just want comforting words, that someone somewhere has a plan and will do something. And that the few patriots and adults in the room are outnumbered 1000 to one (at least on the internet). But we can’t use anyone but adults in the room on our tribe – the one that requires strategy.

And I’m pretty sure that I know every criticism that holds water. So what is your criticism of the work then if you think ‘genuinely intelligent supporters at arms length’?
Because so far I’ve only seen that they want me to take it in a direction I won’t – because it would make me be the next Spencer, the next cville, and the next crushing of the alt right.

I’m not following the others into seeking support of ‘supporters’. I don’t take ‘supporters, seriously. I take “did I solve this problem?” seriously. I take ‘will you show up” seriously. Everything else is just psychological masturbation.

And so I need a few people to help take that problem forward and to control the narrative – and to not be the VICTIM OF THE NARRATIVE that the vast idiotic right majority wants so that they can feel sexually stimulated and wood by the conflict.

As far as I know right-tribes will follow their tribal leaders. And will either be defeated by the left and state leader by leader and tribe by tribe. Or someone, by purely dumb luck, will get enough victories behind him to cause others to follow him.
Because like women chasing athletes and bad boys dominance signals by instinct, the right chases equally foolish masculine dominance signaling by instinct. The right is and always has been anti-intellectual, and pays for it, the same way women are anti-rational and pay for chasing athletes and bad boys that will use then rapidly dispose of them.

As for my goals. My ‘Goal’ is to go back into biz, teach western tradition and our law part-time, and once done with law, and get as far away from this nonsense as possible. Psychology: the reason I like fighting is that as an introvert it doesn’t require me to engage in emotional ties. (as a good psyhologist to explain that. It’s not complicated).

Every great CEO will say the same thing: it’s a lonely, thankless, endless job with little positive reinforcement – but everyone he knows will do an even worse job, so he does it becuase it must be done. Likewise, I only stepped up and went out in front because everyone was doing an even worse job than I was – and aside from one guy who just kicked off a good show – everyone still is. Why? They are running on instinct and emotion not reason and calculation.

The only thing preventing the right from showing up, is cowardice. Because their need to feel in control is their weakness. They fear not being in control more than they feer fighting.

But the only source of control for the right is numbers behind a plan. A plan that will work to win. And will allow them to govern if they win.

So far, like teenage boys, the right thinks about as far ahead as the end of their d-cks – meaning the end of their instincts, beause they don’t think any more than female counterparts do.

And for that reason the dissident right will be destroyed just as easily as Alt-right and Shooters have been, and will only feed the deep state, feed the mainstream narrative, and feed the international narrative against European civ.

The right has to have strategy for winning, a plan for winning, a solution to implement, and a means of transition, and a means of not falling into the enemy’s trap that turns the world (like hitler did) against them.

Otherwise, by sheer disorganization and want of local control, I predict, with my rather usual accuracy, that the right will produce the Libyan conflict and nothing else.

I’m not guided by emotion – which is what the right wants from me. If a sentimental agreement is necessary in a political order then it’s an illogical political order. A polity has only so many organizing principles: You’re either an army, an economy, or a cult. I propose an economy, an army – and y’all want a cult.

So:

1. The Europeans have had the optimum evolutionary strategy – I’m following it.
2. The English had a technology of rule – I’m following it.
3. The Founders had a political solution – I’m just learning from them.
4. Mao had a military solution – I’m just learning from mao.
5. ISIS had a funding solution – I’m just learning from them.
6. Gandhi had a ‘disarm the enemy and state’ solution – I learned from him.
–Curt Doolittle, The Proprtarian Institute

Try to find anyone on the right at any level who can have that conversation or debate with me that won’t be reduced to ‘stupid grunts on the right won’t show without being wood by sexy manhood’ they feel sexually attracted to. That’s what it will be. That will be the end result of every single argument. I know. I’ve spent time slumming with the right. I learned. And I learned they’re even too desperate for ‘wooing by sexy manhood’ that they prefer to fall for the enemy’s traps, rather than to disarm and OWN the enemy – because Gandhi has his own insight into the vulnerability of totalitarian ambitions.

A few of our guys were really smart, and they ‘hugged’ the 2A, Virginia, BLM to stop them rallying against us. I let them talk to us. I flattered them. I make their grievances legitimate and disarmed them of their ability to bait us into hating them. We made the state our enemy not them. I treated them, and we treated them with compassion for their strife. And we offered a solution for all. And we stayed on the moral high ground: we are biologically different and we have different needs, and the state’s attempt to homogenize us so that it and the financial sector can profit from us, prevents us from achieving our goals together by doing it separately, rather than against one another by trying to harm the other. The state is the enemy, the elites are the enemy, the left thought leadership is the enemy -but people are the street are just semi-domesticated animals doing their best with the knowledge and ignorance at their disposal.

And the right needs too much education before they can understand that. And again, my main failure as always is that I always underestimate the depth of human stupidity, even among those in the family so to speak.

ARISTOCRACY, PATERNALISM, EDUCATION, AND ADVERSARIALISM
So, aristocracy it is, paternalism it is, and education it is, and calling the right out into a king of the hill game it is.

And of course, I’ll win that game. As always.

I just hope I can win that game fast enough to matter.
Because we’re out of time.