… weights (personality) limited, and the primary difference in experience due to predictions (imagination), given wide variation in experiences. So while task performance is marginally indifferent between individuals, predictive performance and emotional reaction to ….
Reply addressees: @bierlingm @adamsafron
Theme: Agency
-
weights (personality) limited, and the primary difference in experience due to p
-
produce timing across actions (very complex), (i) We know the brain structures .
… produce timing across actions (very complex), (i) We know the brain structures …that produce each of these phenomena. As far as I know, the mind including consciousness is solved, variation in geometry trivial, variations in experience minor, …
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-10 13:06:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292809562458927105
Reply addressees: @bierlingm @adamsafron
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292808581910339588
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@bierlingm @adamsafron … competition for attention (economics). (f) action is calculated along with prediction, so explains why we detect choice before aware of it – explaining reaction times. (g) dorsal interrupt allows capture of state (control) for impulsive reactions. (h) cerebellum appears to…
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1292808581910339588
-
produce timing across actions (very complex), (i) We know the brain structures .
… produce timing across actions (very complex), (i) We know the brain structures …that produce each of these phenomena. As far as I know, the mind including consciousness is solved, variation in geometry trivial, variations in experience minor, …
Reply addressees: @bierlingm @adamsafron -
competition for attention (economics). (f) action is calculated along with predi
… competition for attention (economics). (f) action is calculated along with prediction, so explains why we detect choice before aware of it – explaining reaction times. (g) dorsal interrupt allows capture of state (control) for impulsive reactions. (h) cerebellum appears to…
Reply addressees: @bierlingm @adamsafron -
competition for attention (economics). (f) action is calculated along with predi
… competition for attention (economics). (f) action is calculated along with prediction, so explains why we detect choice before aware of it – explaining reaction times. (g) dorsal interrupt allows capture of state (control) for impulsive reactions. (h) cerebellum appears to…
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-10 13:02:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292808581910339588
Reply addressees: @bierlingm @adamsafron
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292807450421342208
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@bierlingm @adamsafron … explains the persistence of experience. (d) economics(information, delay) rather than physics (energy, immediate) better explains brain function for the same reasons. (d) geometric (spatial) modeling in the hippocampal region explains consciousness. (e) the same for …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1292807450421342208
-
Are Instincts Enough? (No)
Are Instincts Enough? (No) https://t.co/mgQOONcCN3
-
Are Instincts Enough? (No)
Are Instincts Enough? (No) https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/08/09/are-instincts-enough-no/
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-09 17:36:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292515064377942018
-
Are Instincts Enough? (No)
ARE INSTINCTS ENOUGH? (NO)
—“Can much of human life not be governed by instinct, from fighting to family to other personal functions? Expert pattern recognition is one thing, but can’t personal life be run pretty much by natural law functioning through the instincts?”—Paul
Hmm.. Instinct > Intuition > habit > norms > traditions > laws > group strategy.
And our instinct is reciprocity within the limits of proportionality. So if we have ‘enough’ we are likely to be moral. If we do not have enough we are increasingly likely to stretch the limits of morality because we feel we’re outside the limit of proportionality. Which is the leftist lower middle, working, laboring, and underclass instinct. And Harm-Care bias is the privileged class’ instinct for broadcasting virtue signals thereby claiming their moral superiority without paying any cost for it themselves. Likewise the privileged (I’m guilty in the past) feel we can get away with things because we are ‘superior’. So the middle class that has ‘enough’ is the sort of norm we have to regulate the top and bottom to – because instinct follows status (proportionality).
And, you know the smart people bias? How we can’t imagine how dumb others are? Well, there is moral bias too. We can’t imagine how intuitively immoral others are. And if you spend any time with street people, or even poor people, their ethics are similar but their morality is very different – out of necessity.
So, if courts of the natural, empirical, common law of tort are there to REGULATE us, sure. Personal life can be run pretty much by our instinct of natural law. But if you look around the world, at every culture, across all time, the instinctual norm is self-interest constantly testing the border of ethics and morality. Humans are amoral, and minimally moral. So we must REGULATE intuition regardless of instinct.
Graceful increase in success (knowlege, calculation), and graceful failure (instinct, tradition).
Graceful Adaptability to Time and Knowledge: Brainstem > instinct > intuition > experience > knowledge > reason > calculation > computation.
We must train one another to use the most costly tool we can wield in the given time frame.
The Law Creates a Standard of Weight and Measure
-
Are Instincts Enough? (No)
ARE INSTINCTS ENOUGH? (NO)
—“Can much of human life not be governed by instinct, from fighting to family to other personal functions? Expert pattern recognition is one thing, but can’t personal life be run pretty much by natural law functioning through the instincts?”—Paul
Hmm.. Instinct > Intuition > habit > norms > traditions > laws > group strategy.
And our instinct is reciprocity within the limits of proportionality. So if we have ‘enough’ we are likely to be moral. If we do not have enough we are increasingly likely to stretch the limits of morality because we feel we’re outside the limit of proportionality. Which is the leftist lower middle, working, laboring, and underclass instinct. And Harm-Care bias is the privileged class’ instinct for broadcasting virtue signals thereby claiming their moral superiority without paying any cost for it themselves. Likewise the privileged (I’m guilty in the past) feel we can get away with things because we are ‘superior’. So the middle class that has ‘enough’ is the sort of norm we have to regulate the top and bottom to – because instinct follows status (proportionality).
And, you know the smart people bias? How we can’t imagine how dumb others are? Well, there is moral bias too. We can’t imagine how intuitively immoral others are. And if you spend any time with street people, or even poor people, their ethics are similar but their morality is very different – out of necessity.
So, if courts of the natural, empirical, common law of tort are there to REGULATE us, sure. Personal life can be run pretty much by our instinct of natural law. But if you look around the world, at every culture, across all time, the instinctual norm is self-interest constantly testing the border of ethics and morality. Humans are amoral, and minimally moral. So we must REGULATE intuition regardless of instinct.
Graceful increase in success (knowlege, calculation), and graceful failure (instinct, tradition).
Graceful Adaptability to Time and Knowledge: Brainstem > instinct > intuition > experience > knowledge > reason > calculation > computation.
We must train one another to use the most costly tool we can wield in the given time frame.
The Law Creates a Standard of Weight and Measure
-
THE CHOICE EPISODE 0004 – THE DOG, THE CAKE, AND YOU IN THREE LESSONS Podcast
THE CHOICE EPISODE 0004 – THE DOG, THE CAKE, AND YOU IN THREE LESSONS
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-08 02:04:37 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/104651310863154313