It’s not so much decrease with age but the rate of adaptation (learning) slows with age – and so does speed.
Reply addressees: @kenationalist_ @eruditenights
Theme: Agency
-
It’s not so much decrease with age but the rate of adaptation (learning) slows w
-
It’s a reference to a presumption human incentives, and long-standing debate ove
It’s a reference to a presumption human incentives, and long-standing debate over human nature as moral, amoral, or immoral. The debate is over. Man is amoral (practical). Cooperation is just far more useful (and less stressful)- until conflict, violence, warfare is more useful.
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-08 20:39:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1303432705112190983
Reply addressees: @ryanmcdonaldusa
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1303423314480766976
-
It’s a reference to a presumption human incentives, and long-standing debate ove
It’s a reference to a presumption human incentives, and long-standing debate over human nature as moral, amoral, or immoral. The debate is over. Man is amoral (practical). Cooperation is just far more useful (and less stressful)- until conflict, violence, warfare is more useful.
Reply addressees: @ryanmcdonaldusa -
WHAT DOES STATE OF NATURE MEAN? —“Curt, is “the state of nature” purely allego
WHAT DOES STATE OF NATURE MEAN?
—“Curt, is “the state of nature” purely allegorical?”–Ryan Michael McDonald @ryanmcdonaldusa
It’s a reference to a presumption human instinctual incentives, and long-standing debate over human nature as moral, amoral, or immoral. The debate is over. Man is amoral (practical). Cooperation is just far more useful (and less stressful)- until conflict, violence, warfare is more useful.
That said, what natural conditions? Given stone, bronze, iron, or steel? On an island, a forest, a plain, or mountains? In the arctic, the temperate, the steppe, or desert? Alone, in a band, a tribe, a nation, or an empire? In the presence of kin, kith, competitors, or enemies?
By asking these questions we expose the bias, presumption, assumption (lie), of others. In my understanding, state of nature means what is necessary to survive at the least risk, lowest cost, greatest return, shortest time, greatest certainty.
ie: it’s all just physics. That is ‘nature’. Reciprocity is the only test of whether when humans act (interact) that we are not engaging in parasitism – a violation of physical laws.
Man is amoral. Even when moral, only as immoral as he can get away wit. Because that’s the cheapest (optimum) strategy. It’s called “efficiency”.
Western man simply suppressed as many parasitisms and falsehoods as possible.
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-08 16:46:00 UTC
-
interesting not on psychopathy: the scope and definition of the term has narrowe
interesting not on psychopathy: the scope and definition of the term has narrowed over time. The term today would be anti-social behavior. But AFAIK these behaviors are all caused by group differences in neoteny (Pedomorphism) and class size, and reinforcement by ingroup norms.
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN @Jyrkiboy_ @TruthQuest11 @wax5800 @MD11dr @jimkelly522 @RealJamesWoods -
FYI: IQ is a personality trait, and personality traits the result of brain struc
FYI: IQ is a personality trait, and personality traits the result of brain structure, and brain structure the result of genetics: Ergo Big 5 + IQ = Big 6 + Sex (Amplitude of Sex Differences in Cognition) = Big 7. With Sex< Conscientiousness< IQ dominant.
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/beautiful-minds/how-does-iq-relate-to-personality/
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-07 13:46:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1302966401192407040
-
FYI: IQ is a personality trait, and personality traits the result of brain struc
FYI: IQ is a personality trait, and personality traits the result of brain structure, and brain structure the result of genetics: Ergo Big 5 + IQ = Big 6 + Sex (Amplitude of Sex Differences in Cognition) = Big 7. With Sex< Conscientiousness< IQ dominant.
https://t.co/Z7JBnF9seP -
is a personality trait, and personality traits the result of brain structure, an
https://t.co/Z7JBnF9seP?amp=1IQ is a personality trait, and personality traits the result of brain structure, and brain structure the result of genetics: Ergo Big 5 + IQ = Big 6 + Sex (Amplitude of Sex Differences in Cognition) = Big 7. With Sex < Conscientiousness < IQ dominant in framing ‘higher’ (more valuable) behaviors.
CAUSALITY (BRAIN)
Female <-> Male
Lateral <-> Longitudinal
Integrated <-> Isolated
CONSEQUENCE (OPERATION)
Prey <-> Predator
Peception <->Action
Condition <-> Prediction
Empathic <-> Analytic
Verbal <-> Spatial
INFORMATION – DISNFORMATION (BEHAVIOR)
Intelligence <-> Ineptness
Introversion <-> Extroversion
Openness to Novelty <-> Closed to Novelty
Conscientiousness <-> Impulsivity
Agreeableness <-> Disagreeableness
Emotional Stability <-> Neuroticism
https://t.co/Z7JBnF9seP?amp=1Updated Sep 7, 2020, 11:11 AM
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-07 11:11:00 UTC
-
(Nope. Numbers are numbers. Genes are Genes. Cognitive Software is what it is. T
(Nope. Numbers are numbers. Genes are Genes. Cognitive Software is what it is. This is Rome v2. We either do it now or we don’t. If we don’t, Bolshevism wins. But yes, I’ll continue with my work).
No false promises from us either.
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-05 14:24:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1302251201908662277
Reply addressees: @jamesfoxhiggins
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1302226482857607168
-
(Nope. Numbers are numbers. Genes are Genes. Cognitive Software is what it is. T
(Nope. Numbers are numbers. Genes are Genes. Cognitive Software is what it is. This is Rome v2. We either do it now or we don’t. If we don’t, Bolshevism wins. But yes, I’ll continue with my work).
No false promises from us either.
Reply addressees: @jamesfoxhiggins