Theme: Agency

  • Last to develop – inhibition, agency- first to go. We are self domesticated supe

    Last to develop – inhibition, agency- first to go. We are self domesticated super predators. Domestimation came late.

    Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11

  • Last to develop – inhibition, agency- first to go. We are self domesticated supe

    Last to develop – inhibition, agency- first to go. We are self domesticated super predators. Domestimation came late.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-26 11:45:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1309821444071796736

    Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1309814562053672960

  • The (((woman))) that arranged the relationship had this plan all along and it wa

    The (((woman))) that arranged the relationship had this plan all along and it was rather obvious that this was the trajectory.

    Reply addressees: @MrMatt444

  • The (((woman))) that arranged the relationship had this plan all along and it wa

    The (((woman))) that arranged the relationship had this plan all along and it was rather obvious that this was the trajectory.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-25 20:45:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1309594945972568064

    Reply addressees: @MrMatt444

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1309589384942047232

  • So you mean you signal false courage from afar? You don’t show. You want better

    So you mean you signal false courage from afar? You don’t show. You want better men who show to fight for you while you sit behind a keyboard. You can’t tell sweat from urine, discourse from cowardice, humor from fear, or wisdom from impulse.Meaning you’re a stupid, loud, coward.

    Reply addressees: @Choirs_Of_Vice

  • So you mean you signal false courage from afar? You don’t show. You want better

    So you mean you signal false courage from afar? You don’t show. You want better men who show to fight for you while you sit behind a keyboard. You can’t tell sweat from urine, discourse from cowardice, humor from fear, or wisdom from impulse.Meaning you’re a stupid, loud, coward.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-25 01:29:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1309304072080678914

    Reply addressees: @Choirs_Of_Vice

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1309300813550903296

  • Here is how to understand human evolution (if you don’t know already) Many follo

    Here is how to understand human evolution (if you don’t know already) Many followers do.

    0) Vision increases your range of awareness of threat AND opportunity.

    1) Access to standing and running gets you greater defense and greater range, and greater access to foods.

    2) Access to better foods lets you swap brain size for digestion size.

    3) Better food, smaller digestion and bigger brains, lets you narrow pelvis and run longer and faster at lower energy cost.

    4) Walking and Running are ‘cheap’ and free up your hands to carry tools, weapons, and resources increasing your range, safety, and food opportunity.

    5) Losing your fur lets you dissipate heat faster, so that you can run down rather than fight increasingly rewarding game.

    6) Having achieved physical imitations, Increasing your cognitive metabolism is all that can improve from there. The physical evolution of (skeletal) modern humans doesn’t appear in skeletal remains.

    7) METABOLISM depends a great deal on heat dissipation, and climate affects heat dissipation, as such IQ differences generally reflect ancestral cognitive metabolism in increasingly cold vs increasingly hot temperatures.

    8) Since we’re cooperative creatures, and cooperation is an unsubstitutable good, the only improvement you can make after cognitive metabolic improvement is decreasing in friction (increase in efficiency) meaning selective reproduction for ability and selective culling of lacking ability)

    10). Communication distributes computation decreasing demand for memory retention and increasing demand for adaptation.

    11). The only way to improve communication is a system of measurement.

    12) the only way to improve a system of measurement is parsimony, consistency, correspondence, and coherence. Ie: “P”.

    All of those show up in the archeological record in skeletal remains. But that doesn’t explain the difference between the three waves out of Africa, or Africa itself.

    What doesn’t show up on the record?

    Great apes have an average IQ of 25, and corresponds to a 2.5 year old european – although visual memory in apes and social cognition in humans excel in opposite directions. Humans at this level have an extreme intellectual disability and are unable to self-care.

    The average IQ of bushmen is estimated at 55, and corresponds to the mental age of a European of about 8 years. The average cranial capacity of Bushmen is 1250 cubic centimeters. This is at the bottom end of mild intellectual disability. These people can self-care and learn very basic skills.

    The average IQ of Australian aborigines is the low 60s and they’re the oldest surviving isolated anatomically modern humans. This corresponds to the mental age of an 11-year-old European. it’s possible to learn basic life and survival skills and live independently.

    Average African IQ (if we throw out the extreme bottom) is in the low seventies ~71. 70 is the beginning of ‘intellectual disability’. So there is ‘nothing wrong’ with africans.

    There is a gap here in the 75-85 range. It’s important to understand that people in this range cannot serve in the military as there are absolutely no functions that they can perform without greater risk to materials, self, and others. Why this gap exists is something I’d like to understand.

    The band across North Africa, the Levant, Iran, Pakistan (which is the group I don’t know how to name, and call ‘iranics’, but others call south eurasians has an IQ of about 85. Same for native Americans. This appears to be the ‘normal’ basal eurasian human IQ, absent climate ‘selection pressure’. This is also the ‘problematic’ spectrum where people are both aware of their limitations, frustrated by them, and able to plan and execute crimes. I use the term the ‘evil 80’s’.

    SE Asia (which should include part of southern india) comes in at around 90. (same with turkey but it’s due to european admixture).

    Next is Europe outside of the southeast at 100, and east Asia at 105. But both Europe and east Asia have undergone political ‘natural selection’ under various forms of manorialism (and aristocracy).

    I can and others have, think of explanations for northern IQ advantages other than political selection, but I don’t think any are necessary.

    Examples of cranial capacity

    East Asians ~1416/105 (very high variability in the data)

    Europeans ~1369/100 (low variability in the data)

    Africans ~1282/71 (low variability in the data)

    Aborigines ~1199/62

    Bushmen: ~1250/55

    Early Hominids

    Neanderthals: 1,500–1,740 cm3 (92–106 cu in) (bigger brains)

    Homo erectus; 850 – 1100 cm3

    Australopithecus anamensis; 365-370 cm3

    Australopithecus afarensis; 438 cm3

    Australopithecus africanus 452 cm3

    Paranthropus boisei 521 cm3

    Paranthropus robustus 530 cm3

    Apes

    Gorillas: 340–752 cm3 (20.7–45.9 cu in)

    Orangutans: 275–500 cm3 (16.8–30.5 cu in)

    Chimpanzees: 275–500 cm3 (16.8–30.5 cu in)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-25 00:53:00 UTC

  • Personal note. I think some of us just recall. Some of us form associations. And

    Personal note. I think some of us just recall. Some of us form associations. And some of us develop models. I know that to undrestand anything I have to understand almost everything about it – otherwise I can’t create a model. But once I create a model I can answer far more questions than I could if I had understanding by association, or recitation. I know that as a kid in school (and I’ve hears this same self reporting from elite physicists), I always felt I needed more time, and that they tested us too early. This is why. It’s also why I want to change education from atomized disciplines focused on memorization and repetition to ‘the grammars’ which treat all bases of knowleddge as variations on the same theme.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-24 10:57:00 UTC

  • A DIFFERENT UNDERSTANDING OF INTELLIGENCE – AND MAN The history of the evolution

    A DIFFERENT UNDERSTANDING OF INTELLIGENCE – AND MAN

    The history of the evolution of mankind is the incremental acceleration of adaptability due to periodic stresses. While we don’t study it, climactic stresses in Africa alone during the past five million years were challenging.

    So it is better to describe individual and group intelligence as the rate of individual and group adaptability, and group strategy, metaphysics(paradigm), mythology, tradition, and *method of argument* as regulating our adaptability to our group ability.

    Unfortunately, group strategy can enhance of limit group adaptability, and can advance it (european) or regress it (Islam).

    By using the model (paradigm) of adaptability to relate human biological, social, cognitive, and linguistic processes, we create commensurability across domains and produce a universal understanding of human behavior – thus assisting us in demonstrating that the entire human spectrum of tools (biological, social, cognitive, linguistic AND informational) is not only ‘relative’ but absolutely non-neutral.

    So I’ll take the opportunity to state once again:

    Differences in ability are neotenic and neurological. They may be nothing more than neoteny facilitating differential neurological growth.

    We have cannot yet identify genes determining intelligence, and those we find (thousands) appear to have tiny effect.

    That differences in cognitive adaptability or the distribution of it (memory vs adaptability vs prediction-innovation vs agency) appear to leave little or no evidence in the fossil record other than minor variation in the volume of the braincase.

    We have definite archeological evidence in the record of the evolution of tools and processes.

    We have definite biological evidence in the record of differences in gestation rate, maturity rate, depth of maturity, and self-regulation (neoteny) – which is the direction of investigation that would help us understand intelligence.

    We have definite biological evidence in isolated populations that the earliest people out of africa have the lowest cognitive rate of adaptation, and those people in highest stress environments (colder) the highest.

    And we have a definite recent record in the size of class distributions across human groups.

    And agrarianism obscured this evolution and it and possibly reversed it – which is my suspicion. And that only those groups that converted to manorialism (Rome, Germanic Europe, China) continued it. Agrarianism homogenized populations significantly, and limited evolution, in exchange for providing calories that allowed us a division of labor, specialization, and the application of our adaptation to the production of ‘tools, processes, and ideas’.

    From what I can ‘guess’ from the record, females innovate in neotenic expression along the calcium-melanin channel which appears to have a dramatic effect on rates of reproduction (the time at which a woman appears desirable and fertile). And males innovate in the adaptive expression along the cognitive specialization channel – which as far as I know evolved from throwing spears (or throwing anything). And males either inherit neoteny from females or self domesticate along the testosterone channel since ‘bullying’ has to be kept at an equilibrium where there is sufficient aggression and dominance expression to maintain the competitive ability for the family, clan, tribe, without creating unmanageable internal conflict. My suspicion is that neoteny is a purely female specialization since women (unfortunately) do not select men for it, and therefore women maintain an equilibrium of their neoteny versus demonstrated male dominance, limiting of outsiders outside female social superpredation (control).

    This is my current understanding of the evolutionary process and the differences in the sexes, races, subraces, groups, and classes.

    What it would imply is that the great filter is rather obvious: that any species that develops a division of labor and the returns on it that allow continuous adaptation into niches (division of labor) – and especially any group that develops democracy rather than ‘paternalism’, and does not continue natural selection, will devolve. We can see genetic devolution in the west in just 150 years. We can see genetic devolution in islam and everything it touces. Islam(judaism christianity) is the most desirable falsehood other than drugs.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-24 10:17:00 UTC

  • As far as I know, intelligence is (like everything else) almost entirely genetic

    As far as I know, intelligence is (like everything else) almost entirely genetic. It’s early development biased. It’s controlled by a large number of REGULATORY rather than small number of protein-producing genes. The difference is purely neuronal. Of the neuronal difference its largely hippocampal and frontal. So a lot of things must go right for exceptional intelligence, and anything can go wrong.

    As far as I know nothing else is required of the paleolithic revolution (cognitively modern humans) other than an increase in IQ from the 50-60 (childlike but dangerous) range to the 70-80 range (unpleastant and hostile) to the 80-100 range (most of humanity), to the 100+ range (the people that make abstractions).

    As far as I know, the difference will not appear in changes in morphology.

    As far as I know cranial volume does appear in morphology and IQ.

    As far as I know just like spine and brain volume, developmental IQ is the resut of selection for neoteny (slowing development).

    As far as I know the races reproducte, mature, and have gestation rates that reflect this.

    As far as I know aboriginals isolated after the ice age increase in water levels have mid 60IQ’s

    As far as I know IQ roughtly translates to latitude – but I can’t yet determine if this is an agrarhian or pre-agrarian manifestation.

    As far as I know everyone woud have just GUESSED this prior to the second world war, and pseudoscience has tried desprately to suppress the obvious that science is not confirming.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-23 16:07:00 UTC