1. Sex differences in demonstrated intelligence are due to a minor advantage to males due to brain size, sex differences in cognitive bias(interest), the cumulative effect of exercising sex differences, manifesting in minor task variation, some career, and vast political deltas.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-07 04:45:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1335807625003487232
The sex differences in (a) empathizing (children, relationships) vs systematizing (politics, warfare), and (b) submission(fear) vs dominance(aggression) is an expression of sex differences in bearing the cost of adaptation to reproductive-social vs political-military stresses.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-07 04:40:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1335806396164677634
Reply addressees: @newgovernment7
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1335803536068800515
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@newgovernment7 Sex differences in demonstrated intelligence are due to a minor advantage to males due to brain size, sex differences in cognitive bias(interest), the cumulative effect of experience exercising sex differences, manifesting in minor task variation, some career, and vast political.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1335803536068800515
Sex differences in demonstrated intelligence are due to a minor advantage to males due to brain size, sex differences in cognitive bias(interest), the cumulative effect of experience exercising sex differences, manifesting in minor task variation, some career, and vast political.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-07 04:29:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1335803536068800515
Reply addressees: @newgovernment7
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1335786405897834497
So no, humans are like every other domesticated animal with our nearest behavioral relation, wolf-to-dog, that shares our predatory strategy, the closest example.
The false promises of the enlightenment and the marxist pomo woke counter-revolution against darwin are over.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-06 14:47:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1335596642138009603
Reply addressees: @LCuliberg @JayMan471 @EverydayFinance @timkmak
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1335593160500768768
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@LCuliberg @JayMan471 @EverydayFinance @timkmak The Lies: IQ equality died in 2000, Sex equality died in 2012, Race Equality Died in 2018. There are material biological differences between the races, that are due to increasing rates of self domestication as each geographic race isolated, evolved, and expanded in the territory.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1335593160500768768
Empathy through understanding (reason), not intuition (pre-rational). https://twitter.com/TheAutistocrat/status/1335288561483046918
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-05 18:59:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1335297675361734656
https://twitter.com/TheAutistocrat/status/1335288561483046918
RESTRAINT
–“Restraint is a virtue to the degree is a choice. Restraint is active, not passive. Don’t confuse “active” with “action”. Inaction is can be an active choice for anyone but the helpless.”–@LukeWeinhagen
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-05 01:02:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1335026747121803264
RT @NoahRevoy: Because humans naturally want to live together and are social, there’s no better way to build your agency than with other me…
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-04 21:09:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1334968020616278017
We all see potential within our own limits of agency. I’m not that limited. It’s more a function of what I’m willing to do. I’m willing to try and fail at accelerating the change, and falling back on the long term. That’s cause I know how to make it happen even if I fail to.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-04 20:39:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1334960651618426880
Reply addressees: @NWildfang
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1334960125086318592
-“To categorize an action as virtuous one must be able to choose the action, must be able to stop choosing the action, and the action itself must conform to reciprocity. Ergo, paying the unproductive not to reproduce constitutes a virtuous forbearance into the commons.”-Weinhagen
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-04 18:21:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1334925890732531712
??? “To categorize an action as virtuous one must be able to choose the action, must be able to stop choosing the action, and the action itself must conform to reciprocity. Ergo, paying the unproductive not to reproduce would constitute a virtuous forbearance into the commons.”
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-04 17:42:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1334916028246192133
Reply addressees: @LukeWeinhagen @TruthQuest11
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1334907916881719297