Exhausting excellence, means exausting novelty, means resorting to destructive novelt. This is the evolutionary cycle. We seek attention. Novelty drives attention. Wealth exhausts positive attention. Wealth results in cheap negative attention as the unfit seek status.
THE MOST IMPORTANT KNOWLEDGE EUROPEANS CAN GAIN TODAY Just what I expected. I lay it all out … and crickets. 😉
SUMMARY OF THE VIDEO
We’re all bots – we don’t know why we do what we do.
We’re all running cultural software we don’t understand – it’s a group evolutionary strategy, expressed as a group organizing strategy, expressed as metaphysical presumptions.
We biologically adapted to that software over the millennia
That software biases the male (European) vs the Female (Jewish) group strategies.
This is the maximum adaptive difference possible for human beings because sex differences are the maximum difference in human beings interests.
European civilization, precisely because it’s a trifunctional market for competing elites(Tolerance) is an OPEN society – the ONLY open society – and makes it possible for the Female and Jewish method of conflict to be weaponized.
Female Enfranchisement, Jewish Immigration, and The Frankfurt school migration to (Jewish Stronghold) New York, invited the female method of anti-social behavior, and war into the USA, where the failure of marxism to weaponize the underclass, could be used to weaponize the black class, women, and then to immigrate vast numbers of equal hostiles.
We allowed a competing completely inverse and hostile feminine elite, and enfranchised their natural genetic audience of women into economy and polity, without equally suppressing the female method of anti-social behavior in our laws and institutions.
The result was the Marxist -> Neo-Marxist -> Pomo -> anti-male feminist -> anti-white, anti-male PC-Woke -> Anti west , Anti-white, Anti Male, Anti European, Anti-Indo European -> Dysgenic, Devolutionary, Hyperconsumptive -> Undermining, Deconstructive, female strategy loose.
This has resulted in the repetition of the Jewish->Christian->Female destruction of the Mediterranean civilization, and the resulting dark age, as well as the Muslim reformation of Christianity into the destruction of Levantine, Egyptian, North African, Persian, Anatolian, Byzantine, Balkan, Northwest Indian Civilizations – as the most destructive force in human history. Worse than the great plagues.
This is a relatively easy fix because the common law previously prohibited the female method of social superpredators’ warfare from use within.
So P-Law completes the evolution of European linguistic, rational, behavioral, social, economic, political, and juridical science, and allows us to equally suppress the female method of anti-social behavior and its institutionalization as warfare against European institutions of cultural production.
Preventing another dark age of ignorance, superstition, and decline. And our fall as the sequence of judaism to undermine, Christianity to weaken, and Islam to destroy, have succeeded in so many other civilization, by weaponizing the bottom against the middle with false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe.
Just what I expected. I lay it all out … and crickets. 😉 1. We’re all bots 2. We’re all running cultural software 3. We biologically adapted to that software 4. That software biases the male (European) vs the female (jewish) 5. This is the maximum adaptive difference possible. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1447301470295105540
I don’t think that’s possible because I don’t think it’s possible to defeat human beauty because it includes unpredictable personal ‘error’, that would emerge as the hand of man, and therefore, the new standard of beauty like handmade art now does.
Disagreeability in women is almost as valuable as femininity and fertility. Seriously. I wish I had understood this when I was 16. We overemphasize intelligence and openness, which are obvious goods, but underemphasize disagreeableness and conscientiousness that aren’t.
Because many of us are capable of such decisions. The problem is many aren’t and they obtain their source of truth from social proof. This is why (and I’m trying to work on emphasizing this) agreeableness is only useful if you’re stupid.
Correct but you’re saying one factor of a man’s choices outweigh his others. I know you’re right sometimes. That doesn’t mean you’re right all the time. Same for me for that matter. People don’t matter. Arguments do.
Your animal instincts rebel against being left behind (inequality). That’s why you’re on the left. It’s a natural female cognitive bias with strong evolutionary justification. We are all a mix of male and female. You’re on the female side of the spectrum. Men don’t fear status.