Theme: Agency

  • High Agency < Low Agency > Dependency

    High Agency < Low Agency > Dependency https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1491879036511039497

  • You know, Eric, (and @LukeWeinhagen) this is how we should frame it instead of h

    You know, Eric, (and @LukeWeinhagen) this is how we should frame it instead of high vs low agency, but agency vs dependency. That collapses two axis into one making it easier to understand.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-10 20:57:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1491879036511039497

    Reply addressees: @EricLiford @LukeWeinhagen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1491877606953734147

  • RT @LukeWeinhagen: @EricLiford @curtdoolittle That why it’s important to include

    RT @LukeWeinhagen: @EricLiford @curtdoolittle That why it’s important to include them in the distinction. We don’t want “low agency” the be…


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-10 20:47:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1491876519387484170

  • RT @LukeWeinhagen: @curtdoolittle Reading this got me thinking instead of “low a

    RT @LukeWeinhagen: @curtdoolittle Reading this got me thinking instead of “low agency left” we may gain utility framing it as “high depende…


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-10 20:47:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1491876488353828869

  • @greayman @voxday It’s the female way of denial in exchange for the endorphins.

    @greayman@voxday It’s the female way of denial in exchange for the endorphins.

    The female mind cannot tolerate forced adaptation, because she relies heavily on intuition instead of reason. About a third of males are possessed of the female mind. For this reason we see, as expected, fundamentalism dropping to about the 1/3 of the male population possessed of female brains.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-10 19:29:15 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107775351534749847

  • @StevenV I don’t remember you but (a) it is hereditary in that it runs in famili

    @StevenV I don’t remember you but (a) it is hereditary in that it runs in families (b) its a developmental disorder (c) it appears to be in utero defecdt and may be as simple as it’s not triggering miscarriage as it should (d) I can enumerate the theories but we aren’t spending research dollars on clarifying which one is causal. (e) one thing we have learned is that just as we can trigger psychosis, or schizophrenia in marginal cases, we can trigger homosexuality in marginal cases through trauma. I didn’t believe that but it turns out to be the case. So yes it is possible and likely that there is a high incidence of homosexuality caused by trauma. But the hereditary cause remains because it’s visible in brain structure.

    YOu are afraid of BLM and I simply understand that they are screwed too, so I just see them (like you) as a useful idiot of the enemy. Most people are bots that are only semi-self-aware semi-conscious and semi-able to self regulate and rarely to self-modify.

    I just didn’t want to fuck up like you always do by taking the bait. Which is why we dindn’t get negative press. We just got canceled by you morons.

    Its when we learned you were lost. THat you will be eradicated from the gene pool. and that’s ok. you’re dead weight. defective genes.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-10 01:05:24 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107771011027964254

  • @Nationalist7346 My point exactly. No Power Symbols. It’s like n—ggers and ape

    @Nationalist7346 My point exactly. No Power Symbols. It’s like n—ggers and apes pounding their chests. If you’re a man, and competent you look for the fight and to win the fight, whether it’s symbolic, verbal, or physical. And you must know that the enemy is always baiting you into the hazard -It’s their only (female) technique (seduction).

    Stay on message (words). Avoid symbols (icons)


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 18:56:08 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769559001593118

  • @RedPilledWorld @voxday The only reason to follow Vox is to increase the number

    @RedPilledWorld@voxday

    The only reason to follow Vox is to increase the number of morons who self-select out of responsibility for cognitive agency. Between Vox, Nick, Fuentes, and the handful of other morons, the right is self selecting into various specializations in the spectrum of losership. Moths to flames of ignorance, stupidity, reproductive infertility, political infertility, genetic and cultural replacement.

    Truth is a competitive advanage. The enemy’s competitive advantage is lying. The right cannot compete with the lef’ts competitive advantage in lying. The right cannot also resist the left’s baiting the right into defeat in a competition for who can lie deny and undermine the bset. And so most of these right wingers are just bad liars assisting in the distraction of the morons from any possibility of organized victory.

    Natural selection is at work.
    And the feminine left is winning.
    Overwhelmingly.

    As far as I can tell the ethnocentric national socialists are the only competent popele in the field but by associating with uncle adolph and the swasticka instead of simply advocating for similar policies and poltical secession they disallow themselves the field of political opportunity.

    All the christians are exactly what the rest of the world thinks of them: infantilized drug addicts on the opium of socially constructed ignorance.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 23:27:53 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107764965251254960

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107764768384038667


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    @RedPilledWorld @voxday Oh. I know Vox’s “Math” and as an explanation: non correlation without explaining causation. Now, the means of falsifying this particular argument is relatively simple and someone has already done so in this thread. For example, there are about 100M neural columns in your head. They manage to predict and iteratively test and re-predict a model of the world within a few milliseconds. This EVOLUTION of disorder into order you call perception is possible because those 100M neural colums work in PARALLEL. And they do so by adversarial competition for prediction over time. And those columns that correctly predict contain neurons that get fed for that correct prediction. Now, evolution works the same way. In massive parallel and variation and hybridization and variation and speciation and so on. So the (moronic) oversight of such calculations as vox has stated is presuming that taking an average rate of mutation in a stable life form that by its stability limits mutations is sufficient to statistically represent the wide variety of rates of mutation, the wide variety of selection criteria, and the massive parallelism that occurs as this wide range of potentials compete. Now, of course, the correct answer is that because evolution (evolutionary computation) is the function (first principle) of the universe, and because of the absolutely stupid-simple method of computation by which the universe computes increase in the capture of energy as existence – a stable relation, that anything that can be computed will be computed. And the rate of computation is simply the set of methods of evolutionary computation, the rate of trial and error, the rate and number of regulatory processes, the complexity of the exchange between the cellular biochemistry and the production of molecules, the rate of reproduction, the degree of parallelization, the number and frequency of speciation and recombination, the division of responsibility between cells, organisms, and complex organisms, and the chaos of the selection criteria produced by the environment, resources and competitors. Not how few of those factors are present in the ‘moron math’ of vox day. And how easily you morons are fooled by a basic incomprehension of basic statistics. The big ‘oops’ for example is the capture of mitochondria by one cell that tried to eat another cell. This allowed cells to divide by providing external resources of energy production, and the nucleus to divide the genetic material without increasing genetic mass, and without accounting for energy production. This ‘oops’ is not the only ‘oops’ that appears to have happened. SIMPLE MATH VERSION Any math that ends in infinities is false. Any math that is non-correspondent is false. Any math that cannot provide an operational construction is false. Because all of these failures are evidence of a failure to account for variables – what we call ‘hidden variables’. Vox’s math (which isn’t his by the way), is false.

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107764768384038667

  • @Snidely_Whiplash @RenegadeScoutr @voxday Explain why you think that is the case

    @Snidely_Whiplash@RenegadeScoutr@voxday
    Explain why you think that is the case and I’ll explain why you’re wrong. 😉

    The difference between generations of pre-human to human primates is largely in regulation of the expression of growth stem cells by migratory distance from the neural tube. This is not a genetic difference expressed in the composition of proteins it is a regulatory difference in expression of processes that is most likely the result of regulating the production rate of protiens or transports instead of additional complex molecules.

    This is why there is so little difference in SNP variation between chimps and humans. We can only measure some of the informational content of the DNA. It also means we are a long way of closing the gap between genetics and medical treatment, unless as in rare cases the genetic deficiency is one or two simple SNPs.

    It’s not complicated. It was just complicated to figure out. DNA analysis does not retain the expression (state) of sections of the genome.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 22:10:05 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107764659371452306

  • @veraticus @voxday Funny. It’s you cognitively femine who avoid the argument. I

    @veraticus@voxday Funny. It’s you cognitively femine who avoid the argument. I use the same masculine paternal strategy as always: I stay with the central argument, improve the argument, insult the opposition for lying, denying, and then repeat until I’ve amassed a body of argument that I can copy, paste into a long form, for others to learn from. You know why this works? You pussies run out of the ability to use female GSRRM, Jewish-Marxist-Pomo Critique, and abrahamic pretense of knowledge before I run out of consistent, coherent, correspondent, complete, argument. And why? Because of course the argumentative context doesn’t matter. What matters is illustrating that I”m correct and that we can identify female means of deceit used for both abrahamic theological of the old world and abrahamic pseudoscientific (marx, pomo, woke) of the new world. 😉

    And you suckers take the bait every time. Why? You are so desperate to defend your socially constructed, heavily malinvseted, lies that your moral outrage causes you like a pavolovian dog to yeet yeet yeet in response.

    It’s hysterical really. That’s why christians are the world’s ass clowns.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 20:27:49 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107764257226154564