Theme: Agency

  • RT @uberboyo: Studies have shown Leftists are NOT empathetic: – They are less ca

    RT @uberboyo: Studies have shown Leftists are NOT empathetic:

    – They are less capable of understanding right wing concerns than vice versa…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-26 23:19:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1883656030103716269

  • RT @isabelunraveled: if you are extremely high agency, probabilities based on th

    RT @isabelunraveled: if you are extremely high agency, probabilities based on the average person don’t apply to you


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-25 15:43:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1883178838634770486

  • Yes. But why don’t people object to offensive truths if they would so so interpe

    Yes. But why don’t people object to offensive truths if they would so so interpersonally or in a group versus when they hear it as the member of an audience?


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-24 19:29:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1882873313544056997

    Reply addressees: @TylerLitrel

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1882872780389290240

  • Well, you know, I”ve been teaching the simplicity of consciousness for quite a f

    Well, you know, I”ve been teaching the simplicity of consciousness for quite a few years now. And it really is quite simple. The problem is, it requires an extraordinary volume of memory in a hierarchy of adversarial layers and continuous processing of a continuous stream of information somehow proximal to human experience (context). I just can’t see that happening. Same problem as the octopus and its multiple brains because of its tentacles.

    Reply addressees: @PlayerJuan11


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-24 03:14:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1882628015768956928

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1882626342086418849

  • I won’t go that far. It doesn’t have persistence and consciousness goals or agen

    I won’t go that far. It doesn’t have persistence and consciousness goals or agency (continuous reflective recursion) but it does have an understanding of the world, though at what you can I would consider a pre-conscious level. The fact that it can use language obscures the…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-24 03:03:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1882625147951346114

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1882623566052827399

  • I have been told many times that my moral tolerance is a convenience of privileg

    I have been told many times that my moral tolerance is a convenience of privilege and remnant of aristocratic ethics – and I”m not sure that’s false. That said, I won’t change it. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-22 23:39:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1882211423570608161

    Reply addressees: @RutRemy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1882170677136101853

  • “Q: Problem: the inability (of moderns) to see that humans are animals”– Or the

    –“Q: Problem: the inability (of moderns) to see that humans are animals”–

    Or the false promise of the marxists-to-progressives that we are not has been successfully indoctrinated into the population. After all, the entire. marxist sequence is a denial of the four categories of laws of the universe: measurement and commensurability (logic, truth), scarcity (physical), survival(behavioral, acquisition, self interest), evolutionary (genetic, neoteny, sex, load, differentiation).

    But saying we’re animals, is a narrative analogy still – it’s not precise enough to work with. We solve differences in understanding with precision of measurement.

    Humanity is just our extraordinary ability capacity to adapt because of the volume of neurons, the time, space, and population capacity to predict using that memory, and our transfer of information by imitation(physical), empathizing (feeling), and sympathize (reasoning) and verbalizing (continuous recursive disambiguation of information into that action we call speech).

    Any creature with the same spectrum of senses (spectrum of vibrations, and all neural cells do is respond to vibrations at different frequencies) and same neural density in the same recursive hierarchy in relation to body size and form, should produce the capacity for mutual understanding and eventual communication.

    umans are very different from animals in capacity for adaptability in time but not different in dependence upon defeat of entropy by acquiring more complex caloric sources than we expend in time, nor in our instinct, intuition, and valuations.

    Affections
    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 18:01:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881763956701929472

  • Yes, if we do nothing other than scale: 1) sense, perception, cognition, predict

    Yes, if we do nothing other than scale:
    1) sense, perception, cognition, prediction, action in time, and;
    2) body size and therefore scale of actions in time that are useful for the organism
    … then we should roughly be able to comprehend the framing of any organism. I am suspicious that intelligent life, if it exists, will be very different from us – at least – in the sense that we should be able to develop a means of communication.

    (Thinking… See “Dragon’s Egg” (1980) by Robert L. Forward.)

    Reply addressees: @jamesgreenWY


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-18 20:14:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880710434069897216

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880706437174931844

  • THE SPECTRUM OF TERMS IN RATIONALITY I don’t think you understand the term “rati

    THE SPECTRUM OF TERMS IN RATIONALITY
    I don’t think you understand the term “rational”. Specifically, that subset of ‘Bounded Rationality’, and “Rational Choice”.

    1. Rationality vs. Rationalism
    Rationality: A broader, pragmatic concept encompassing both logical reasoning and decision-making based on goals, evidence, and constraints.
    Rationalism: A narrower, philosophical doctrine asserting that reason is the primary source of knowledge and truth, often at odds with empiricism.
    Misuse and Popular Conflations:
    – Rational ≠ True: Something can be rational (logical within a framework) but still incorrect if the premises are flawed.E.g., “All humans are immortal; Socrates is human; therefore, Socrates is immortal” is rational but false.
    – Rationalization ≠ Rationality: Rationalizing is often a form of self-deception, while rationality involves aligning beliefs and actions with evidence and logic.

    2. Rational
    Definition: Adhering to reason or logic, where reasoning is the process of deriving conclusions from premises through valid operations.
    Key Trait: Does not imply truth, only that the reasoning process itself is internally consistent and logically valid.
    Applications:
    Everyday Use: Describes thought or behavior guided by logic, evidence, or pragmatism, as opposed to emotion, superstition, or impulse.E.g., “Choosing the cheapest, most reliable car was a rational decision.”
    Philosophical Context: Refers to using reason as the primary means to make decisions or form beliefs.E.g., “His argument was rational because it followed valid logical principles.”
    Economic Context: Refers to behavior aimed at maximizing utility or efficiency within given constraints.E.g., “Rational agents make decisions based on available information to optimize outcomes.”

    3. Rationality
    Definition: The quality or state of being rational.
    Types:
    Instrumental Rationality: Effectively achieving goals using the most efficient means available.E.g., “It is rational to save money to buy a house if home ownership is a goal.”
    Epistemic Rationality: Forming beliefs in proportion to evidence and coherence with existing knowledge.E.g., “Believing the Earth is round based on scientific evidence is epistemically rational.”
    Bounded Rationality: Recognizing the limits of human reasoning and decision-making due to constraints like time, information, and cognitive capacity (Herbert Simon’s concept).E.g., “Consumers often make satisficing choices rather than optimal ones due to bounded rationality.”

    4. Rational-Related Permutations in Practice
    Economic Rationality: Decision-making based on cost-benefit analyses (e.g., classical economics).
    Scientific Rationality: Systematic application of logic and empirical methods to understand phenomena.
    Moral Rationality: Decision-making based on ethical principles derived through reason.
    Practical Rationality: Everyday reasoning to navigate life efficiently and effectively.

    5. Rationalism
    Definition: A philosophical position emphasizing reason as the primary source and test of knowledge.
    Philosophical Context:
    Core Belief: Certain truths can be known a priori (independent of sensory experience) through reasoning alone.
    Contrast with Empiricism: Empiricism holds that knowledge originates primarily from sensory experience.E.g., Rationalism posits that mathematical truths exist independently of empirical observation.
    Notable Rationalist Philosophers: René Descartes, Baruch Spinoza, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz.E.g., Descartes’ “Cogito, ergo sum” (I think, therefore I am) relies on rational intuition rather than sensory input.
    Modern Usage: Often associated with reliance on reason and critical thinking as opposed to dogma, tradition, or emotionalism.

    6. Rationalist
    Definition: A person who adopts rationalism or emphasizes reason as a core guiding principle in understanding the world.
    Historical Context:Philosophers who prioritize a priori reasoning and deductive logic over empirical methods.E.g., Leibniz’s monadology explains reality through rational principles rather than empirical observation.
    Contemporary Usage:May refer to individuals who emphasize critical thinking, skepticism, and reliance on scientific reasoning.E.g., “Modern rationalists advocate for evidence-based policymaking.”

    7. Rationalization
    Definition: The process of justifying actions, decisions, or beliefs using seemingly rational explanations that may not reflect the true motivations or reasons.
    Psychological Context:
    Often involves post hoc reasoning to align actions with self-image or social norms.E.g., “He claimed he quit his job to pursue personal growth, but the real reason might have been fear of failure.”
    Considered a cognitive bias or defense mechanism.
    Sociological Context:
    Refers to the structuring of society or institutions based on logic, efficiency, and calculability (Weberian rationalization).E.g., Bureaucracies are examples of rationalized organizations.

    Conclusion
    The term “rational” and its permutations have varied but interrelated meanings, spanning logical reasoning, epistemology, practical decision-making, and psychological justifications. Clarifying the context and intended use is critical to avoid conflations, particularly between philosophical doctrines (rationalism) and practical applications (rationality).

    Reply addressees: @punishedelu @MichaelJLeone @whstancil


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-15 19:44:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1879615660948598784

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1879295558910902479

  • “Curt Doolittle’s exploration of sex differences in argumentation can be linked

    “Curt Doolittle’s exploration of sex differences in argumentation can be linked to broader psychological and cognitive theories regarding sex differences in perception, valence, auto-association, cognition, and behavior. Here’s how these concepts might relate:

    Perception:
    Sex…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-15 02:04:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1879348887556857980

    Reply addressees: @cathasach4bikes @whstancil

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1879334644149321781