Theme: Agency

  • No. IQ is IQ. A general measure of neural responsiveness. Let me help you: While

    No. IQ is IQ. A general measure of neural responsiveness. Let me help you: While we are both an admixture in the main, female brains empathize in time and male brains systematize over time. So we intuit things the other doesn’t. The result is Prey vs Predatory, Verbal Experiential vs Spatial-Mechanical, interpersonal vs political, oppression vs conspiracy, womansplaining vs mainsplaining.

    Reply addressees: @lindaserg


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-08 05:15:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633335728766681090

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633325314498592768

  • No. IQ is IQ. A general measure of neural responsiveness. Let me help you: While

    No. IQ is IQ. A general measure of neural responsiveness. Let me help you: While we are both an admixture in the main, female brains empathize in time and male brains systematize over time. So we intuit things the other doesn’t. The result is Prey vs Predatory, Verbal Experiential vs Spatial-Mechanical, interpersonal vs political, oppression vs conspiracy, womansplaining vs mainsplaining.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-08 05:15:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633335728846372868

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633325314498592768

  • No. I’m Extroverted and Gregarious. And people are excellent toys

    No. I’m Extroverted and Gregarious. And people are excellent toys.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-07 23:12:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633244141688696834

    Reply addressees: @ladyinabag1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633243857520345091

  • DO WE HAVE A SOUL? IF SO, HOW? I should ‘science’ the concept of the soul in a v

    DO WE HAVE A SOUL? IF SO, HOW?

    I should ‘science’ the concept of the soul in a video.

    Like many intuitions of the ancients, they simply had no means of describing an experience other than in supernatural terms. Yet, there is a biological process and resulting intuition and behavior that is analogous to the soul. 1) A low level persistence of your behavior in time. 2) Others memories of you over time, that do somewhat play out. 3) And there is some merit to the soul/karma concept in demonstrable outcomes because of them.

    These three concepts can be expressed as derivations of the laws of the universe. But, just as you need legs to run, and running is a potential only until you do run, and running comes into existence only as you are running. Likewise, a soul needs a nervous system, and it needs biological processes, and mental processes to come into existence.

    Humans, whose primary competitive value comes from specializing in adaptation itself, and the utility of returns on cooperation over time, are very good at subconsciously ‘computing’ debts owed and credits issued, with status as the means of increasing opportunities, and decreasing costs of debts owed and credits issued.

    One of the universe’s unpleasant truths is that the brain is an acquisition engine, and cooperation can vastly improve cooperation, and status vastly improves the number and quality of opportunities to cooperation with increasingly successful returns. We humans try to paint a nice picture of ourselves, but we are just an extension of the physical universe. We dissipate energy (entropy) and we counter it by capturing energy (negative entropy). And as Adam smith demonstrated, many hands make for far lighter work than you’d expect by orders of magnitude.

    But we’re still just doing what every animal, plant, molecule, element, particle, proto particle are doing: trying to maintain enough energy to persist (exist) before we dissipate back into the quantum background.

    Your soul is your internal chart of accounts of harms(debts) and contributions (credits) and your status is something you face every day in the mirror. It’s very hard to lie to ourselves. And other people often keep very good accounting of us too. With the record of both often written in the expressions on our faces.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-07 20:57:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633210285115731970

  • DO WE HAVE A SOUL? IF SO, HOW? I should ‘science’ the concept of the soul in a v

    DO WE HAVE A SOUL? IF SO, HOW?

    I should ‘science’ the concept of the soul in a video.

    Like many intuitions of the ancients, they simply had no means of describing an experience other than in supernatural terms. Yet, there is a biological process and resulting intuition and behavior that is analogous to the soul. 1) A low level persistence of your behavior in time. 2) Others memories of you over time, that do somewhat play out. 3) And there is some merit to the soul/karma concept in demonstrable outcomes because of them.

    These three concepts can be expressed as derivations of the laws of the universe. But, just as you need legs to run, and running is a potential only until you do run, and running comes into existence only as you are running. Likewise, a soul needs a nervous system, and it needs biological processes, and mental processes to come into existence.

    Humans, whose primary competitive value comes from specializing in adaptation itself, and the utility of returns on cooperation over time, are very good at subconsciously ‘computing’ debts owed and credits issued, with status as the means of increasing opportunities, and decreasing costs of debts owed and credits issued.

    One of the universe’s unpleasant truths is that the brain is an acquisition engine, and cooperation can vastly improve cooperation, and status vastly improves the number and quality of opportunities to cooperation with increasingly successful returns. We humans try to paint a nice picture of ourselves, but we are just an extension of the physical universe. We dissipate energy (entropy) and we counter it by capturing energy (negative entropy). And as Adam smith demonstrated, many hands make for far lighter work than you’d expect by orders of magnitude.

    But we’re still just doing what every animal, plant, molecule, element, particle, proto particle are doing: trying to maintain enough energy to persist (exist) before we dissipate back into the quantum background.

    Your soul is your internal chart of accounts of harms(debts) and contributions (credits) and your status is something you face every day in the mirror. It’s very hard to lie to ourselves. And other people often keep very good accounting of us too. With the record of both often written in the expressions on our faces.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-07 20:57:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633210285342203904

  • RT @Max_Stoic: Lift weights for strength Cardio for health Make money, invest in

    RT @Max_Stoic: Lift weights for strength

    Cardio for health

    Make money, invest intelligently

    Grow deep relationships with loved ones

    Enj…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-07 15:53:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633133793971253248

  • I think you mean logical not rational. That humans are rational only requires we

    I think you mean logical not rational.
    That humans are rational only requires we explain their choices via and intersection between their knowedge and incentives: bounded rationality. What you’re suggesting is that humans might think logically, as if their knowledge and skill in its application are hihger than what they possess. As far as we know, all choices are rational. Are they reasonable? Are they logical? The quesetion is whether they are even conscious? And if so, what is the balance between conscous rationality and unconscious intuition, impulse, and instinct. All of which are rationally explicable. But not always logical.

    Reply addressees: @Freedomcallblo1 @PNACstreetgang @FenianWiseguy


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-07 13:06:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633091683146514434

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632972201807822848

  • I think you mean logical not rational. That humans are rational only requires we

    I think you mean logical not rational.
    That humans are rational only requires we explain their choices via and intersection between their knowedge and incentives: bounded rationality. What you’re suggesting is that humans might think logically, as if their knowledge and skill in its application are hihger than what they possess. As far as we know, all choices are rational. Are they reasonable? Are they logical? The quesetion is whether they are even conscious? And if so, what is the balance between conscous rationality and unconscious intuition, impulse, and instinct. All of which are rationally explicable. But not always logical.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-07 13:06:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633091683234598915

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632972201807822848

  • “Explore and find myself”– Translated: grow up in your 20’s because you didn’t

    –“Explore and find myself”–

    Translated: grow up in your 20’s because you didn’t in your teens. Try to overcome the falsehoods you were indoctrinated into, and the debt you accumulated to pay for them, and in doing so burn your fertility, adaptability to the opposite sex, and…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-06 21:30:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632856199031865346

  • All: The four primary races vary in neotenic evolution. Neoteny will select for

    All:
    The four primary races vary in neotenic evolution.
    Neoteny will select for intelligence and agency in exchange for sexual maturity and agreession.
    Might be somehow be effect of increase in meat consumption creating increase in size then decrease by neotenic evolution. Looks like it.
    Proximity will select for non-aggression,and so neoteny.
    Cold and planning, will select for intelligence.
    Meaning isolation + size + neoteny + ‘close living’ is necessary for increase in intelligence.
    The difference between the races then is largely the size of the underclass that carries non-neotenic as well as genetic load – which is largely visible to the naked eye.
    This fits the genetic history we have found, and keep increasing the dataset for, every year now.

    Reply addressees: @Steve_Sailer @PostAp0calyptik @DialecticBio


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 03:45:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632225891697717248

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631829168110596096