Theme: Agency

  • THE SIMPLE BEHAVIORAL TRIANGLE –“My simplest mind model (so far) is: Yes, Maybe

    THE SIMPLE BEHAVIORAL TRIANGLE

    –“My simplest mind model (so far) is: Yes, Maybe, No.
    1 – Women say Yes to Society (Consumption, Demand),
    2 – Ascendant Males try Maybe in Economy (Production, Supply) and,
    3 – Dominant Males enforce No in Polities (Limits).
    They can have positive, neutral, and negative feedback loops. Separation, Sort, and Speciate ought to help positive loops and a thousand nations bloom.”– Bryan Brey


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-29 14:03:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1663180438830022657

  • This doesn’t help us given the polarity of differences in conscience between the

    This doesn’t help us given the polarity of differences in conscience between the feminine(consumptive) and masculine (conservative) biases. For some reason certain groups (the faithful in particular) live under the illusion that we all share the same moral intuition and instinct – we don’t. SO appealing to conscience doesn’t mean anything at all because all leftism, and most feminine cognition, is nothing more than justifying irresponsibility and theft.

    Reply addressees: @FlorianRose_


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-28 18:15:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662885204199890944

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662883594849898496

  • 1. Language a) language or some correlate will evolve with enough intelligence (

    1. Language
    a) language or some correlate will evolve with enough intelligence (neurons) in relation to body form – in an social animal, since inter-species communication is the only advantage.
    b) language allows us to think increasingly complex thoughts just as the organization of our limbs and muscles allows us to make more complex bodily movements than. our primate ancestors.
    c) Some language is so beneficial that it generates demand for more intelligence allowing more language.
    d) At present we are somewhat limited by the relationship between the quality and rate of food we can digest, and the energy that results, and the fact that the brain is eleven times as expensive as muscle mass. Although we could increase the quality of life through a soft eugenics program that increased average IQ’s up into the teens or twenties.

    2. Yes we are in a world of deception. Every time we invent a new form of communication or transport we give rise to a new set of opportunities for deception unless we for some reason are lucky enough to identify and make those new’ crimes’ illegal and prosecutable.

    3. It’s rather easy to end the left’s lies and crimes. All leftism is crime. It’s not complicated. But we need the power to put it into law. This may require separation (secession) to achieve since there are so many liars and cheats in modernity.

    Reply addressees: @cavaller_humil


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-28 17:06:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662867948304736256

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662858739811065857

  • RT @toodarkmark: Waiting to have kids is detrimental to the kids

    RT @toodarkmark: Waiting to have kids is detrimental to the kids.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-28 06:00:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662700249394061319

  • You are young and judge quickly. I am not young, and I give people the benefit o

    You are young and judge quickly. I am not young, and I give people the benefit of the doubt until I’ve exhausted all possibility. Why? Because nearly everyone is a fool when it comes to the hard questions. And we cannot judge them until we inform them – despite that they will likely resist And those few that are not fools lie for personal status, fulfillment, and gain. Leaving but a few of us in every generation to cleans the folly of the previous. 😉

    Reply addressees: @TheAutistocrat @StephenKing


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-27 00:44:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662258316003647491

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662257288244019202

  • What about people with compassion and empathy but the inability to scale it into

    What about people with compassion and empathy but the inability to scale it into systematizing that predicts outcomes? What about people who are just cowardly and afraid of resolving the conflicts that arise due to the scarcity of everything, yet claim their empathy is a virtue rather than a crime? What about those who put those who do not lack the courage, will, ability, to judge, take responsibility for the constant conflict of man over pervasive scarcity in competition with human desire to export risk and cost upon others? Doesn’t that mean that you are claiming empathy rather than convenience and irresponsibility, are judgemental, entitled, and egotistical?

    Yes it does.

    Reply addressees: @Philosophi_Cat


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-27 00:39:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662257271064125440

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662174346813554690

  • The reason? The computational provides explanatory power. This is why I emphasiz

    The reason? The computational provides explanatory power. This is why I emphasize an operational understanding of the brain. And it turns out that operationally? Well, it’s not that complicated per se. There is just a lot of it. It’s possible to explain all human behavior today.… https://twitter.com/hippopedoid/status/1646512942786166787


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-26 13:26:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662087889226813440

  • Nothing DOES matter if you lack the agency to implement change. What produces th

    Nothing DOES matter if you lack the agency to implement change. What produces the absence of agency? Power distance. What produces power distance? Population and Population heterogeneity.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-25 19:05:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661810717597597729

    Reply addressees: @oldbooksguy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661709705000144896

  • “Q: Culture/religion? Less freedoms afforded by society. This is usually best wh

    –“Q: Culture/religion? Less freedoms afforded by society. This is usually best when dealing with less intelligent people.”–

    Less intelligent people require more regularity in their environment in the form of religion, culture, norms, traditions, values, so that they can rely on imitation rather than cognition.

    Likewise less intelligent people require more intelligent people so that they can adapt, if slowly, to environmental changes.

    And as a consequence evolutionary adaptation of a people (their rate of development) is determined by the ratio of intelligent people to unintelligent people. This means most peoples should be able to enter ‘civilized modernity’ over time. But ‘should be able’ does not mean ‘will or shall’.

    So (as I believe you’re suggesting) intelligence generates demand for freedom, rule of law, and financial abuses and lack of intelligence generates demand for authority and generates corruption by political abuses.

    Cheers.
    Curt

    Reply addressees: @Nefertiiti @VeritateIn


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-25 14:41:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661744426086207488

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661740814995963904

  • “Q: Correlation (of intelligence) with empathy and impulse control?”- With Empat

    -“Q: Correlation (of intelligence) with empathy and impulse control?”-
    With Empathy Negative – simply biases female verbal experiential vs male spatial mechanical.
    With Impulse control positive – no difference between controlling recursion over time (thinking) and controlling impulse to isolate attention from redirection.
    Impulsivity does correlate with neuroticism (prey response).
    Correlation with impulse control is via conscientiousness and intelligence.
    Intelligence = Prediction.
    Prediction = Auto association by time and scale
    Conscientiousness and intelligence = Agency
    Agency ~= Neoteny (the direction of behavioral evolution)
    Sex differences in prediction are:
    Female Interpersonal Empathizing In-Time, predicting emotional state. Seeking status through hyperconsumption and evasion of responsibilty for commons.
    Male Political Systematizing Over-Time, predicting world state. Seeking status through capitalization and seeking responsibility for commons.
    Stereotypes are the most accurate measure in behavioral science, that doesn’t require external tooling.
    But we are all an admixture of male and female biases, as is evident in the voting data: F1/3,N1/3,M1/3.
    As such most all outliers are male, most averages are female. This suits the ‘computational’ needs for adaptability to nature vs persistence of parentaing of a population with long development times, better than all the alternatives.
    -Cheers

    Reply addressees: @DanButton15 @datepsych


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-25 14:34:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661742610418114565

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654225794724421633