Theme: Agency

  • No kidding. Before this started I said I know both ukrainians and russians from

    No kidding.
    Before this started I said I know both ukrainians and russians from having worked and lived among them. And two things are certain: (a) ukrainians wil fight to the last man for their freedom, and (b) russians can endure hardship like no other people on earth.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-20 18:42:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671226988864864290

    Reply addressees: @d4n_m4d3r1a @DanAnde23836316 @nukeisraelnow

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671226199581007872

  • FOUNDATIONS OF CONSCIOUSNESS SERIES (Added another video) A couple of years ago

    FOUNDATIONS OF CONSCIOUSNESS SERIES
    (Added another video)
    A couple of years ago I started producing a series of videos from the basic nervous system through to consciousness. I’d forgotten to publish this one on spaces and places (our sixth sense), and I’ve also recorded the Hippocampal region (where we create episodes and auto-associations, and predictions – where the magic happens).

    I’m not thrilled with the recording quality because I was in ‘constrained’ circumstances taking care of an elderly parent and recording in an auditorium. That said, I’ve written most of the content for everything through the circuits of the brain and yes, the experience of qualia and consciousness.

    My intention was to demystify (end the philosophical sophistry and pseudoscience) and explain with relative clarity how simple the brain, mind, and consciousness really is, despite its massive parallelism. And it really is quite simple. If it wasn’t, then flip-book animations wouldn’t work. 😉

    These videos were the original first course of the Foundations (The Work). But we found we needed to start with a much simpler starting place. So we switched to the discussion of how to present the content, and eventually (almost two years ago) decided to use the first principles, despite my original desire to start with the brain, the logic, then grammars, then the first principles (scientific laws).

    There are content creators today who are doing similar work even if less coherent in explaining the functions of the brain as an ‘operating system we experience’.

    But this will get the point across for those who are interested.

    I will most likely have to re-record the whole series at some point and have someone increase the production quality – when I have the time, which I rarely have.

    For now we are working on the first book and the constitution. From there we will have the foundations to work on the rest of the books and the lessons. for them. But again, we are effectively trying to produce a four year program in multiple disciplines with a tiny team and it’s not easy. Ask anyone who has produced college courseware for stem.

    https://t.co/yC9VUXDIU7


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-20 00:29:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670951856032366597

  • Q: “How Do We Avoid Nihilism?” By loving ourselves and taking on that responsibi

    Q: “How Do We Avoid Nihilism?”
    By loving ourselves and taking on that responsibility, we had attributed to god with confidence that we can, despite struggles, persevere and evolve into the gods we imagine. And make a garden of this planet and this universe, that if such a god…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-20 00:09:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670946950798012420

    Reply addressees: @KomondorDaugrin @TheAutistocrat

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670943708919877635

  • Q: DOES FREE WILL EXIST? Excellent example of a question that is intentionally o

    Q: DOES FREE WILL EXIST?

    Excellent example of a question that is intentionally or not misunderstood and misrepresented.

    Can we, and therefore are we responsible and accountable for our actions – particuarly in the sense of criminal, ethical, moral, seditious, and treasonous.…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-19 21:49:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670911704568406020

    Reply addressees: @tryanph

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670908605439287296

  • Q: DOES FREE WILL EXIST? Excellent example of a question that is intentionally o

    Q: DOES FREE WILL EXIST?

    Excellent example of a question that is intentionally or not misunderstood and misrepresented.

    Can we, and therefore are we responsible and accountable for our actions – particuarly in the sense of criminal, ethical, moral, seditious, and treasonous. The answer is obviously is yes. We have free will in the context of right and wrong.

    The misrepresentation of this question is ‘are events and thoughts deterministic (soft determinism) or predetermined (hard determinism).

    The answer is that all human be havior is categorically deterministic because we are all motivated by the marginally indifferent (assuming we conflate the sexes) incentives, within the same body form, with the same constraints.

    But given that the distribution of the universe is determinable and determistic (categorizable by general rules) but not determined (these rules apply only chaotically in various distributions at varioius times in various conditions) and information is llimited to locality and humans are insulated from all but very great pressures (compared to background quantum events), and given that all human prediction is imprecise and combined of ideosyncratic experience and error, then no our actions are not pre-determined. and the cannot be.

    My argument when I was very young was quite simple: human predictive error and choice because of that error is so pervasive that error alone would prohibit hard determinism.

    So I’ve never really understdood how the presumptions of ‘mathematics’ could be appled to human behavior, when we have known for a very long time that economics has demonstrated the unpredictability of human behavior even when we have extraordinary volumes of precise information.

    And the neurons in one person’s head make economics look trivial by comparison.

    Ergo, free will exists within the limits of an individual’s experience, knowledge, competency, and error – and we are really good at ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, denail, deceit, fraud and every variation thereof.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-19 21:49:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670911704262221827

  • Think of it this way: the smart fraction determines competitiveness, and the rat

    Think of it this way: the smart fraction determines competitiveness, and the ration between them and the rest of the population determines the general advantage or drag on it.

    We have something like 170M Europeans who have on average a 100-103 IQ depending upon the original ethnic group. Japan has 125M. They have an advantage in smart fraction over us. AND they’re a homogenous high trust culture.

    Think of India. 1.3B people and eight times our population, but an IQ (debated) of 76 (max 83). That means despite a much lower IQ (more than a standard deviation at least, as high as 1.6 lower. But they produce an absurd number of people over 125 anyway, because of the size of the population. And despite that they have trouble governing and producing an economy because of the drag.

    We can’t trust any numbers coming out of China, and academic performance in US universities show their academic records are largely nonsense. We don’t even really know their population. It looks vastly overstated. We know that aside from government ‘leaders’ and a few elites they’re desperately poor. Even so with that population they are producing CITIES of engineers.

    Reply addressees: @MudKevin


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-18 02:18:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670254658718257152

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670251254424158210

  • I’ve written the same explanation so many times: SHORT FORM: Demonstrated intell

    I’ve written the same explanation so many times:

    SHORT FORM:
    Demonstrated intelligence consists of the following criteria:
    i) IQ (rate of pattern recognition and adaptation)
    ii) Short term(working) memory (necessary for mathematicians and chess players)
    iii) General knowledge (reading a lot on a lot of subjects generally makes you smarter)
    iv) Method of inquiry consisting of inputs ( allegory, parable, history, measurement) and methods ( free association, mysticism, reason, rationalism(justification), science(criticism).
    v) Wants/Errors: Impossible Wants, Impossible Beliefs, Metaphysical Errors, and Erroneous Assumptions
    vi) Lack of impulsivity: Discipline, and Time (great ideas are achieved by focused work over very long periods – often approaching a decade or more)

    https://t.co/lsQsE3DEYb

    Reply addressees: @MudKevin @Spalther


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-18 02:07:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670251821267398658

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670250021588189184

  • Never assume your degree of agency is the norm, when some people have far greate

    Never assume your degree of agency is the norm, when some people have far greater agency. All you would need to do is show up when asked.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-18 01:59:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670249915262402560

    Reply addressees: @whitestrike00

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670249548017545216

  • They are incorrect. Though yes plasticity is possible. You can improve your demo

    They are incorrect. Though yes plasticity is possible. You can improve your demonstrated intelligence with general knowledge, specific knowledge and direct experience. You cannot improve (g) which is a basic property of your biological development. Most people who continue to learn and develop will gain a point of advantage every x years, but you cannot by any known method improve the transmissibility of your neocortex.

    Reply addressees: @jwilhelmi


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-18 01:53:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670248359074971654

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670246827684245505

  • 1) People with higher IQ have greater self regulation (yes) 2) People with highe

    1) People with higher IQ have greater self regulation (yes)
    2) People with higher IQ have less incentive to act immoraly. (yes) Partly because they associate with people who also have higher IQs, have higher chances of being caught, but have greater opportunities for reciprocity.
    3) People with higher IQ commit fewer crimes.

    We MIGHT argue that the distribution of immorality is normal, but the evidence that we act upon it otherwise.

    It’s the same reason so many sociopaths are indistinguishable from normal, happy, succesful people: it’s just in everyone’s benefit, especially your own, to act morally, because cooperation is so much more rewarding than immorality and crime.

    So no, eugenics has been profoundly successful everywhere in every civ. Read Harpending on “Genetic Pacification” and any other study of the decline inc riminality in europ with manorialism and hanging.

    Read what rice farming does to behavior.

    Reply addressees: @XLColdJ @xMajorKills


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 19:46:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670156072252784645

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670150079003480066