Theme: Agency

  • PROGRESS REPORT : Dear Diary (personal) In ten years, with two bouts of cancer,

    PROGRESS REPORT : Dear Diary

    (personal)

    In ten years, with two bouts of cancer, and as a consequence, two more serious illnesses requiring surgery, followed by divorce from a long happy marriage, and the near destruction by an investor’s greed ignorance of the $100M company I built during that period despite these ‘challenges’.

    I set out to change my life, to leave the war-zone of that company behind me (check), to lose weight (check), to write at least half time (check), to treat each day as a precious gift to enjoy (check), to build a smaller company where I had more sovereign control (check) and less unnecessary stress herding not-very-bright-cats (check), to find a woman who was my dedicated friend and partner, not a life draining dependent (check). 🙂

    And I’m still building a new (and probably better) company, with better people, and writing what I think is pretty good, durable philosophy that’s reforming libertarianism from a rhetorical, moral and preferential basis, to a scientific and necessary one.

    Life is tragic, comic or heroic.

    It’s a choice.

    My advice is to choose. 🙂

    It is always better to be a warrior than a slave.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-11-10 02:50:00 UTC

  • ENTREPRENEURSHIP: PAIN TOLERANCE I’ve said this before, but it seems to me that

    ENTREPRENEURSHIP: PAIN TOLERANCE

    I’ve said this before, but it seems to me that the difference between entrepreneurs and other people, is largely (a) pain tolerance (b) extraordinary competitiveness and (c) unhealthy confidence bordering on ruthlessness.

    I mean, I’m burning through a tremendous amount of money building Oversing. It HURTS just to think about it. It hurts largely because of how hard I had to work to make that money.

    But the flip side is that I can control it, and make it what I want it to be, without compromise. And If I’m reasonably successful, my return on investment will be about 100x or so.

    Entrepreneurship isn’t for the weak or the timid. That’s for sure.

    Edison said mentioned Inspiration and Perspiration but somehow he forgot to mention risk and pain tolerance, myopic and obsessive dichotomous thinking, and the desire and ability to sell ideas. ‘Cause selling is what it takes to do almost anything.

    “SCHUMPETERIAN THINKING” : the love of creative destruction.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-11-09 15:12:00 UTC

  • RUINING AN AUSTRIAN’S DAY “Man must act” is of course, true, but it is an incomp

    RUINING AN AUSTRIAN’S DAY

    “Man must act” is of course, true, but it is an incomplete sentence. “Man must act to serve his interests” is the full sentence. And completing the sentence demonstrates it’s irrelevance. The meaningful problem is that “Man must voluntarily cooperate.” And that is where the problem becomes difficult. Because man must actually “calculate and choose to outwide the current course of events”.

    We call Reductio ad absurdum arguments rhetorical fallacies for a reason. ANy act of simplification or categorization is necessarily eliminative. “

    One must be careful not to eliminate the causal properties of that which is required for later deduction from first principles.

    It’s a cute trick of obscurant logic. And the genius is in constructing the (false) obscurant logic. Not in what we can deduce from it.

    Human cooperation requires the voluntary payment of vast opportunity costs, for which they expect something in return. No activity is conducted for altruistic reasons. All activity is conducted in exchange for something. Most of it for insurance on inclusion in future opportunity.

    Which Mises ignores and Rothbard intentionally avoids.

    It’s possible to fix Mises’ Praxeology and Rothbard’s ethics, but only by restoring the recognition of those costs, and the consequential impact those costs have on the program of ethics we libertarians rely upon.

    Fixing those errors then, returns LIBERTY TO ARISTOCRACY, truth and clarity, and rescues it from the ghetto of obscurant, deceptive language meant intentionally to mislead.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-11-08 07:21:00 UTC

  • YOUR INTELLECTUAL JOURNEY You know, you start out on any subject and it just see

    YOUR INTELLECTUAL JOURNEY

    You know, you start out on any subject and it just seems like there is this vast literature, an infinite amount to learn, and that you’ll forever be ignorant. You struggle to gain each new concept, and master its application. You find some niche and sort of master that, then expand out from there to learn more.

    At some point you grasp, that in any field there are a very small number of basic principles. And that you must simply master the permutations of those principles. And that, really, most writing is other people trying to LEARN themselves, by applying those basic ideas or trying to refute them. And so there is an awful lot of ‘chaff’ and very little intellectual ‘wheat’. The problem is learning how to separate wheat from chaff. Other than that, each field isn’t very hard.

    (Math is interestingly like this. I mean, you can understand all that there is to know about math from the very basics to the most complex. The problem though, is like chess. The basic rules are really simple actually. But the sequence of moves is pretty enormous, and the consequences of those moves more so. And the art is in actually PRACTICING all those various transformations until you gain an insight from the practice of transforming. Myself, I find it boring as hell. But some people love puzzles and I love problems and that’s what a division of labor is for.)

    At some point you begin to grasp the intellectual struggle of each person back into ancient history as trying to wrestle with and within his or her limited knowledge paradigm, and doing the best he or she can. (And that’s when you realize that Aristotle was godlike.) But you can empathize with each of them and their circumstance.

    (Philosophy is like this. You see that basically everyone has a bit of fragmentary knowledge and is trying to apply it before they have sufficient empirical means to do so. Worse, that most philosophers are trying somehow to get power, justify power, or undermine power. And in that way, philosophy is a sort of middle ground between religion (norms) and science (laws). But it becomes quite clear that most of the time, they just don’t have good scientific tools to work with, and they ‘re stuck with religion’s model of thought.)

    At some other point you begin to see yourself in some paradigm of limited knowledge and and begin to think about what assumptions that you make might be wrong given the most recent increases in knowledge. And at that point you’re usually crushed and humbled.

    (The internet has done more for knowledge accumulation than I had ever dreamed of before. I almost can’t reconstruct life before it. Its so horribly SLOW by comparison. So TEDIOUS. I mean, ordering BOOKS from LIBRARIES? Ungh…. It’s hard to be an info-vore in the age of paper, without patience. For those of us with ADD like symptoms, it’s awesome that you can drink from the fire hose CONSTANTLY. )

    And then you realize that all of us, even the best, really are fighting against the dark forces of time and ignorance, each of us but a bit of kindling upon the pyre of those who came before us. Some work with diligence their entire lives and serve to maintain by not extend our understanding. Others manage a single marginally useful idea. And others shovel them out by the wagon load as fuel for a coal fire.

    And it seems a random game at times. But you can’t win if you don’t play. And it matters more that you play hard, than that you desire to win.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-11-04 15:52:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/16/us/study-finds-early-signs-of-creativity-in-adults.html?smid=fb-share


    Source date (UTC): 2013-11-04 01:46:00 UTC

  • TO BE MARRIED TO AN ENTREPRENEUR Great advice. “We are a team”. (Eh….I had one

    http://johnmichaelmorgan.com/how-to-be-married-to-an-entrepreneur/HOW TO BE MARRIED TO AN ENTREPRENEUR

    Great advice. “We are a team”.

    (Eh….I had one of these priceless women and we screwed it up. But ever onward.)


    Source date (UTC): 2013-10-30 04:21:00 UTC

  • WATCHING THE PRESIDENT : TRENCHANT NAIVE IDEALISM Watching Bush II was kind of i

    WATCHING THE PRESIDENT : TRENCHANT NAIVE IDEALISM

    Watching Bush II was kind of interesting. He sort of looked at his job and it unfolded as he expected, and he knew what the price would be, and his position was that history is the only judge of presidential actions. Now, I disagreed with him on a bunch of them. And his presidency was the last hope of restoring the republic. Demographics have made it impossible now. We have to break up the empire to preserve western civilization in any form at all.

    Watching this guy is something quite different. Most of us knew he was symbolic. That he’s an empty suit elected by the media as a cure for white sins. And honestly, given the change in behavior of black males, I wish we could have elected a black man earlier, and done it with a conservative.

    But this guy has a different bias. He actually believes all the nonsense he was exposed as a child, all the hate he was told, and is taking revenge on america as best as he can with his time in office. He undoubtably thinks he us undoing injustices.

    He makes gaffe after gaffe, idiotic policy move after policy move, and they all fail. And he doesn’t understand why. He doesn’t understand why his is unappreciated. He doesn’t understand why they fail.

    But you can see it in his face that he expects people to love and appreciate him. He doesn’t understand why we don’t agree with him. He doesn’t UNDERSTAND.

    “HE DOESN’T UNDERSTAND”

    It’s either that or he’s the most evil person to get into politics since Pol Pot and Joseph Stalin. Because you couldn’t screw up the world more than this if you tried. I didn’t think we could have a president worse than Carter, or more inept at execution than Bush.

    But I was wrong.

    You know, Clinton was a freaking genius at politics and if he hadn’t been so freaking stupid with feminizing the military, radical conservatives, and his attraction to large breasts, he’d be unassailable. I mean I loved and hated him at the same time.

    People underestimate Reagan. He was brilliant. Charismatic, profoundly moral. He read Hayek and applied it. He understood it. He changed the world. He was a perfect high priest of american culture. He was the last high priest of it.

    Obama is just another politically approved, symbolic fool put into a administrative job in control of the empire – an empire past its peak, purpose, and utility.

    And you can see it on his face as he runs away to play golf to get away from the work load.

    KINGS AND QUEENS AND GUILLOTINES

    A monarch’s job is to be the high priest of civic culture. THe most envied societies are monarchies. Monarchs must have veto power, and little else. They are the representation of the people’s moral code. And their morality is guaranteed by guillotine. YOu cannot kill a bureaucracy but you can kill a king.

    We need to break up the empire. We are now for to twelve different cultures and we need to break into four to twelve different countries.

    The only value of the federal government is in the efficiency and power of a combined military force, and the function of an insurer of last resort. It has no value in law. No value in trade. No value in culture. No value in morality. And may in fact produce just the opposite.

    Let us see how the northeast and the left coast function with a hostile and conservative farmland between them.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-10-28 13:04:00 UTC

  • Is there something to the fact that less intelligent people are more likely to c

    Is there something to the fact that less intelligent people are more likely to consistently believe in magic (intentional causes)? That smart but ignorant people overestimate our capacity. And more intelligent people who are knowledgeable are afraid of HUBRIS?

    I mean, does the ‘smart fraction’ theory simply mean that liberals are ignorant, and willfully ignorant, and libertarians are not? Or are liberals less intelligent (probably).


    Source date (UTC): 2013-10-25 15:15:00 UTC

  • WORKING YOUNG (personal) (silly) I started working for my father’s business at a

    WORKING YOUNG

    (personal) (silly)

    I started working for my father’s business at age seven. On holidays. I would take the list of deliveries and get them out of the cooler, put them in the truck, strap them down, then ride with the driver, walk up to the house, ring the bell, say something polite and cheerful, get back in the truck, and do the next delivery. I earned one dollar an hour.

    At twelve I got a paper route. It was the biggest paper route in town. One hundred and eight to one hundred and twenty newspapers on sundays. Sunday was very heavy and took me a lot of trips. I used a wagon if I could, and a red sled in the snow. But usually just a canvas shoulder bag. And walked from house to house.

    It is very cold in upstate NY in winter. 🙂 But the air smells amazingly good.

    I loved delivering the papers. But I hated collecting the money. Too much human interaction with too many strange people. It made me exhausted.

    I saved up, patiently, in a jar, and bought my mini bikes. 🙂

    But I understood inventory, cash flow, receivables, sales, revenue, and, unfortunately, a lot about filing in alphabetical order, and how to serve customers by the time I could do multiplication tables. 🙂

    Dad made me practice introducing myself and shaking hands a lot. Incredibly valuable really. And more of the same: I actually know what all those little forks, knives, spoons and glasses are for. 🙂 And how to tie a necktie. That kinda stuff. Which, if you’re an Aspie, turns out to be awesomely confusing to normals.

    LOL

    Life is awesome. Too bad we don’t get a couple of trial runs.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-10-23 18:48:00 UTC

  • Einstein was right you know. It’s all just a matter of working on the problem re

    Einstein was right you know. It’s all just a matter of working on the problem really hard for a lot longer than anyone else (is willing to).

    🙂


    Source date (UTC): 2013-10-21 18:24:00 UTC