Theme: Agency

  • PARENTING STYLE HAS NO EFFECT ON ADOLESCENT AND ADULT IQ. Like I’ve been saying:

    PARENTING STYLE HAS NO EFFECT ON ADOLESCENT AND ADULT IQ.

    Like I’ve been saying: you can screw up your kid, but you can’t make him or her better. The best thing you can do is just do things together as a family, with other families, and in teams, and particularly in team sports.

    Sorry. That’s it. It’s 50% genetics, 0% nurture, and 50% consequences in utero.

    https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2014/01/31/its-not-nature-and-nurture/


    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-26 12:44:00 UTC

  • I desire to build the best tribe that I can. That is the top of the pyramid of p

    I desire to build the best tribe that I can.

    That is the top of the pyramid of personal fulfillment.

    And the top of the evolutionary period of achievement.

    I will cooperate with you as long as it helps me achieve that goal.

    And as long as I do not sacrifice that goal.

    I agree not to prey upon you.

    But if you choose parasitism and to justify parasitism,

    Then I will choose predation.

    It is far more enjoyable to conquer, enslave or kill you,

    Than to be subject to your parasitism and predation,

    And to sacrifice by personal fulfillment and evolutionary achievement.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-24 12:05:00 UTC

  • “Honda Aircraft CEO Michimasa Fujino, who has worked on the project for decades.

    ——-“Honda Aircraft CEO Michimasa Fujino, who has worked on the project for decades. “This airplane is my art piece,” he said in an interview.”——-

    A man who speaks aristocratic language.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-18 10:53:00 UTC

  • Dear god. Thank you for the courage (insanity) to give up everything and move to

    Dear god.

    Thank you for the courage (insanity) to give up everything and move to this strange new (insane) world to start an amazing (insane) business building an (insane) enormous product in an era of (insane) uncomfortable risk in hopes of producing (insane) extraordinary returns.

    Your (insane) devoted admirer.

    Me.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-16 10:08:00 UTC

  • IF THEIR BAD ARE MORE CAPABLE THAN YOUR GOOD, WHAT HAPPENS? Good atheists, bad a

    IF THEIR BAD ARE MORE CAPABLE THAN YOUR GOOD, WHAT HAPPENS?

    Good atheists, bad atheists. Good christians, bad christians. Good jews, bad jews.

    The problem is not that one group is good or bad; it is the aggression and capability of people within the group.

    If one set of people is more capable than another, then both the good and the bad are exaggerated. This is the way to look at the influence of all groups. This is the way to look at the good and bad of all groups. More aggressive and more capable people pursue their self interest more successfully than less aggressive and less capable people.

    We all pursue our self interests. I don’t criticize people for pursuing their self interests. That would be illogical. On the other hand I am happy to criticize people for not defending themselves against the bad, aggressive and capable.

    It usually means that they are consuming rather than investing in defenses.

    Which is the case, in this case.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-12 11:16:00 UTC

  • OUR INTER-TEMPORAL DIVISION OF PERCEPTION, COGNITION, KNOWLEDGE AND LABOR Is thi

    OUR INTER-TEMPORAL DIVISION OF PERCEPTION, COGNITION, KNOWLEDGE AND LABOR

    Is this the correct spectrum? hmm……

    UTOPIAN (progressive) verbal/gossip/short term…

    …………TECHNICAL (libertarian) scientific/exchange/medium term…

    ………………………..TRADITIONAL (conservative) normative/force/long term


    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-11 04:19:00 UTC

  • The Demographics of Gun Ownership

    A CORRELATIVE ANSWER, THEN THE CAUSAL ANSWER

    The Correlative Answer: Part 1: Social Structure
    Northern Europeans above the Hanjal Line (The North Sea Peoples who successfully out-bred) sometimes referred to as the Protestant Peoples) retain an ancient set of traditions requiring all men to obtain legitimacy and honor (equal status) through participation in the militia, and the purpose of the militia is to deny all men power over all other men. This is preserved most strongly in the anglos dutch and less so in the germans, who were anglicized.

    The Causal Answer: Part 2 Tradition
    There are a small number of underlying heroic traditions that carry the western Aristocratic (meritocratic) Egalitarian (enfranchisement to all who fight) tradition – and that tradition is the cause of the rapid rate of western development compared to all other civilizations, both in the ancient, and modern eras. These are:
    1) Heroism (purchase of enfranchisement and status through sacrifice)
    2) All property is private (all property is earned)
    3) Every man is his own legislator over his domain.
    4) The common law and independent judiciary permit the resolution of differences between equals without appeal to authority.
    5) The rule of law, the common law (organic law, natural law) applies to all men equally. 
    6) Hierarchy is necessary for decision making in war, the resolution of conflicts, and for the suppression of free riding.

    The value in this structure is that the common law can evolve with the first judicial ruling, and therefore both transaction cost and risk are reduced, and the chance of free riding, parasitism, fraud and predation are eliminated before they can be institutionalized. The market for law suppresses parasitism as fast as innovations in parasitism are created. In turn, innovation in products, services and ideas can progress with the least resistance from predators. Costs: The consequence for the underclasses is that while they benefit from the rapid innovation, they are more aware of the difference between those who are less productive and those who are are more so.

    The Causal Answer: Part 3 : Incentives
    As population destiny increases, all effects increase by approximately 20% for every doubling of the population. 
    The incentives for people in rural areas where all men bear a high cost of policing the commons, is more restrictive than the incentives for people in urban areas where few bear the cost of policing the commons.

    In general, people in areas of dense population discount the cost of policing commons and norms because opportunity, transaction and policing costs are lower.

    The Causal Answer Part 4: Diversity.
    Diversity decreases trust, increases political divisiveness and decreases economic velocity. Urban areas can afford immigrating diversity. Rural areas cannot.

    It’s all rational really.

    WHAT IS HAPPENING
    The effort to expand ownership has been successful and once people have limited skill with, and ownership of guns, it tends to transfer like all traditions between families.

    The greater the effort to suppress gun ownership the greater the passion with which gun owners preserve the tradition.

    We have roughly tripled gun sales under this administration. Demographically the argument is over and the pro gun movement has won. (surprisingly)

    The supreme court has learned a tragic lesson from Roe v Wade: that the court should not solve social matters until they are first resolved by the states. That decision has nearly destroyed the court. “The Democratic Process Must Do Its Work” is the phrase we hear from the court.

    The general consensus is that we have a problem controlling mental illness, and urban poverty, and not a problem with firearms.

    So as far as I understand, the matter is settled for at least the next generation.

  • “Given the choice between criticism and action – choose action.”–Johannes Meixn

    —“Given the choice between criticism and action – choose action.”–Johannes Meixner


    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-05 10:50:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://www.iflscience.com/plants-and-animals/innovative-female-chimps-may-have-pioneered-tool-use-hunting


    Source date (UTC): 2015-04-29 09:46:00 UTC

  • MOVES ELLIE, SMALL MOVES” Vast human behavior complexity can be constructed by v

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Androgen”SMALL MOVES ELLIE, SMALL MOVES”

    Vast human behavior complexity can be constructed by very small variations in androgenic production. Races, tribes, and civilizations, exist as a behavioral demonstrations of reproductive strategies, using various formal and informal institutions to manage cooperate between groups with different androgenic, and therefore behavioral differences.

    As I have written profusely, variations in Median IQ, Language vs Spatial IQ, impulsivity, aggression, and disgust can produce completely different societies. And conversely, not all peoples are capable of (or in need of) similar institutional models.

    From what I can gather, the normative means of breaking familial bonds and extending kinship trust to non-kin (what we call religion) is far more important than we had assumed. However, this does not eliminate the problems of immorality, impulsivity, aggression, general intelligence, and verbal intelligence, demonstrated in the curve of abilities regardless of the race, tribe, or culture.

    So the intensity of enforcement of norms and institutions is directly proportional to the degree of impulsivity, aggression, general intelligence, and verbal intelligence.

    I suspect that while improving human genome so that it is longer lived, is far harder than improving the human genome so that it produces greater neurogenesis, more white matter, less impulsivity and aggression.

    But the point remains that one must be impulsive, aggressive, intelligent enough to keep out the more impulsive, aggressive, and less intelligent.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-04-27 07:19:00 UTC