Women who are raised with other children, especially younger children, will tend to desire children. Some portion of women who have not will tend to favor hyperconsumption (selfishness) over child rearing.
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 13:58:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714279633213120851
Reply addressees: @RemttidAcul @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714278990461214927
RT @curtdoolittle: @OooBardam @LaundryQueen__ I don’t to black pills. It’s just an admission that (a) you’re powerless (b) you’re incompete…
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 19:40:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714003523023646860
Valuation systems.
empathizing in-time by prey animal seeking hyperconsumption and evading respnsibility for status (being takn care of).
vs
systematizing over-time by predator animal, seeking capitalization for status (taking care of).
All sex differences between the feminine bias and the male bias (we are all an admixture despite some of us are extremes (me)), are reducible to that list. you can explain all behavior from that simple list.
Reply addressees: @Real_SF
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 17:31:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713971060758994944
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713958699046420649
yeah. neuroscience: reading makes use of working memory as a buffer (delay) and questioning, which is less subject to animal spiricts (intuition). So yo’re really just tlaking about the difference between the agency producted by maturity and the absence of it as a resistance to…
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 17:17:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713967344664408510
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713965943909695684
HUMAN NEEDS: THE NARRATIVE VS THE RATIONAL VS THE SCIENTIFIC VS THE COMPUTATIONAL
Well, you know, let’s look at this hierarchy:
1) Age: infancy > childhood > young adulthood > adulthood > maturity > elder wisdom.
2) IQ: 60’s > 70s > 80s > 90s > 100s > 110s > 120s > 130s > 140s+
3) Scale: Instinct > language > social order > economic order > political order > political order at scale.
4) Decisions: Imitative ethics > heroic ethics > rules based ethics > outcome based ethics.
5) Methods: Imitation > parables > mythology > theology > history > Philosophy(logic) > Rationalism(logic) > Empiricism(measurement) > Science(calculus) > Constructive Logic(computation).
SCIENCE:
1) all languge consists of measurements.
2) all increases in means reasoning increase precision, scope, and scale.
3) all increases in precision scope and sale require an increasein (a) cognitive burdnen (b) general knowledge (c) experience and skill.
So we require a standard of measurement, a group strategy, and a hierarchy of means of trainging intuition, or rreasoning, or calculating or computing, given the ability and age of the opulation and the scale of the problems needing calcualtin as the divisuion of perception, cognition, valuation, demand, negotiation, advocacy, and labor increase, while our knowledge ‘of the whole’ decreases rapidly until the only knowledge we have is norm, tradition, custom, law, pricing, and calculation.
So my point here is that yes the narrative is the most useful at every level of precision using every method of communciating at that degree of precision and scale.
Like wise the narrative is the most subject to suggestion, loading, framing, obscuring, fictions, fictionalisms, lying, baiting into hazard, frauds, denial, and all other forms of deception. (Which is why women and jews dominate the pseudosciences especially in the literary, historical, anthropological, psychological, social, economic, and political – anything open to empathizing bias instead of the science of systematizing.) I keep a list of the pseudoscientists and while you get the occasional nitwit european the jews dominate the field of production AND harms. It’s hard to call the women pseudoscientists because by and large it’s the literature of whining and magical thinking.
And so no, the narrative and intuitionist appealing to the instinct of the ingnorant is only the starting point – and the assumption that ‘all need this’ or ‘this is the best’ is simply false. It is just one of the tools necessary for complexity as we transform more energy per capital for our use – which is what, in the end, all human measures consist of.
Cheers
Reply addressees: @Real_SF
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 17:15:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713966849002536960
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713959442776211536
it’s a naive (immature) instinct of the feminine bias in cognition that places empathy in time over systematizing over time. And thy can’t help it. (really). Unless we work hard to teach them how to overcome those impulses.
If you read Jon Haidts work on differences in moral…
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 16:54:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713961604428001672
Reply addressees: @JohnJayDale @Real_SF
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713960138317480361
it’s a naive (immature) instinct of the feminine bias in cognition that places empathy in time over systematizing over time. And thy can’t help it. (really). Unless we work hard to teach them how to overcome those impulses.
If you read Jon Haidts work on differences in moral intuition the feminine left is biased to harm/care/fairnss which is an empathic in-time bias, and they totally ignore the reciprocity, proportionality, liberty, loyalty, purity moral instincts. Conservatives don’t. Conservatives roughtly weiight all moral instincts evenly. This is why conservatives and libertarians can understand the left but they can’t understand conservatives (masculine instincts).
Some of my early work reduces Haidts work to variations in property rights making his efforts compatible with the law. As such women think in privat property only while men think in private AND common property. Why? Men are CAPABLE of taking responsibilty for the commons because we are capable of handling risk, and women run from responsibility and risk at all times without exception for other than their children. Even then, women have killed more of their children through exposure or worse, than men have killed other men in war.
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 16:54:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713961604272840704
The origin of religion is the need for mindfulness: the suppression of neuroticism (worry, anxiety, fear, panic), as we, as social animals, are incdreasingly alienated by the increase in population, division of labor, and knowledge of our own irrelevance, and increasing absence of insurance by family, clan, and tribe. Religions evolved to produce mindfulness and insulate us from the uncertainty that increases as the uncertainty of the tribe’s understanding of the external world, is replaced by one’s own uncertainty of one’s safety and security in the internal (social) world.
Reply addressees: @whatifalthist
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 15:41:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713943160110333952
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713796434288320582
WHY ARE MEN BROUGHT DOWN BY WOMEN
(TLDR; women are selfish, greedy, jealous, envious, hyperconsumptive, hypergamic, attention seeking and are only devoted to men in time, never loyal to them over time. “Men may be bad, but women are evil.” – And no I do NOT enjoy this knowledge.)
ANSWER
Because we are only now beginning to understand the science of female behavior is a near mirror opposite of he male: female devotion in time vs male loyalty over time; endless hyperconsumption and hypergamy vs capitalization and political capitalization; status by parasitic extraction from males by seduction vs status by accmulation of skills, captial, and responsibilty for personal and political capital.
Once you see it you can’t unsee it.
And you then you will come to the second horrible realization: that marriage is an institution that evolved in the presence of capital assets (largely domesticated animals and land and some tools), first because access to mates are the primary reason men kill, and second to prevent the gluttony of women and make them as responsible for capital as are men – despite that throughtou all of history both women and men have struggled to suppress female ‘shrilling and gossiping’, adultry, by ‘undermining and attention-whoring’.
I’ve said this for a few years now but women are reversing ten thousand years of incremental attempt to produce harmony between the sexes, and the folly of the feminists has destroyed it and re-taught us the true nature of the woman in just under a century.
We are letting the left destroy not only the harmony between the classes, and the races, but between the eesxes, and it’s the geatest act of arfare in human history affecting the greatest number of people.
Cheers
Reply addressees: @whatifalthist
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 15:38:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713942615488393216
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713695485888749757
I don’t to black pills. It’s just an admission that (a) you’re powerless (b) you’re incompetent. The truth is all we need is for 2M men to ‘show up’ and it’s over. Our organization has done the work on reforms across the spectrum. We have exhausted debate, exhausted morality, exhausted voting, and so all we have left are the courts, and repetition of the founders. That’s what I do, we do, and will do.
Reply addressees: @OooBardam @LaundryQueen__
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 13:45:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713914177041928192
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713808233469538347