We seek emotions because we evolved those emotions for very obvious reasons: rewards. What is it that we are seeking a reward for? What change in state or preservation of state do we seek to achieve and for what reason? Emotions are only rewards and punishments. What are we rewarded and punished for by monopoly orders? Originally, and still in some parts of the world, competition was considered immoral. Why isn’t the monopoly of orders, like competition, just lagging indicator of our need to create institutions that allow us to act morally in the new order, rather than cling to what is no longer moral out of habit and intuition? BTW: I usually say it this way: we value status signals higher than every other good. Why are status signals valued higher than any other good? Why do we need confidence in our status? Why do we want status signals from others? Why would we evolve such a thing? for the same reasons every other species has means of demonstrating fitness. Except that we cooperate, so it is not just reproduction but survival that depends upon our status.
Theme: Agency
-
Necessities, Not Preferences
Sep 06, 2016 11:32am Life, liberty, and property are necessary for our extension of perception and the choice of actions, across nature, competition, ignorance, time and space – without which we cannot defeat the forces of nature, competition, ignorance, time, and space. We must preserve life, liberty, and property in order to obtain the cooperation, information, productivity, and prosperity within which choice is available to us.
-
Necessities, Not Preferences
Sep 06, 2016 11:32am Life, liberty, and property are necessary for our extension of perception and the choice of actions, across nature, competition, ignorance, time and space – without which we cannot defeat the forces of nature, competition, ignorance, time, and space. We must preserve life, liberty, and property in order to obtain the cooperation, information, productivity, and prosperity within which choice is available to us.
-
I Know My Job: To Create A Plan And Make Room For Alexanders
Sep 06, 2016 11:43am ( I am not Alexander. I am only Aristotle. I understand my role. To create the strategy and let loose the moral license which can be used by the generals, captains, sergeants, and soldiers to change the world to that which they desire. But we have given license to the bourgeoisie in the anglo enlightenment, and the peasantry in the Jewish enlightenment, and we must succeed where the German’s failed in returning license to the aristocracy. Warriors need a strategy because violence is an instrument of change, but not an instrument of administration and preservation. My job is to give permission to the martial class to restore aristocracy for the necessity of our people, the leadership of our civilization, and the transcendence of man. ) ( Josh Jeppson )
-
I Know My Job: To Create A Plan And Make Room For Alexanders
Sep 06, 2016 11:43am ( I am not Alexander. I am only Aristotle. I understand my role. To create the strategy and let loose the moral license which can be used by the generals, captains, sergeants, and soldiers to change the world to that which they desire. But we have given license to the bourgeoisie in the anglo enlightenment, and the peasantry in the Jewish enlightenment, and we must succeed where the German’s failed in returning license to the aristocracy. Warriors need a strategy because violence is an instrument of change, but not an instrument of administration and preservation. My job is to give permission to the martial class to restore aristocracy for the necessity of our people, the leadership of our civilization, and the transcendence of man. ) ( Josh Jeppson )
-
August Quotes
—Part of being a man of good character is killing those that need killing for the sake of your family, tribe, and nation.”—Curt Doolittle –“The truth is the truth no matter who speaks it.”— David Mondrus —“I see the alt-right as the difference between morals and virtues. Morals being simply a set of rules that people follow and see as good, and virtues being good qualities within yourself, such as truth telling. The Alt-right is the first political movement in generations to have Virtue at its core. Because we’re the first political movement in generations to tell the truth.”—Dylan Bailey —” 1) The old republican party:evangelicals 2) The democratic party:anarchists (violence) 3) The new republican party:disenfranchised males “— Curt Doolittle —“Members of good families want nationalism, members of bad families universalism – in other words, they want a better family than made them.”–Curt Doolittle —“God is a hedge by the irresponsible against the failures of the self, providing absolution consistent with time preferences, and an excuse not to go seek achievement of their capacity.”— John Jost —“The politicians do not want us to tell the truth about Economics, politics, morality, and ethics. Because if we do they will be hung. There is no value in scale any longer. If polities are in conflict then separation is desirable. Different people need different norms and laws, and institutions to suit their levels of genetic distribution (development). This would decrease their power. We must always seek to decrease political power.”—
-
August Quotes
—Part of being a man of good character is killing those that need killing for the sake of your family, tribe, and nation.”—Curt Doolittle –“The truth is the truth no matter who speaks it.”— David Mondrus —“I see the alt-right as the difference between morals and virtues. Morals being simply a set of rules that people follow and see as good, and virtues being good qualities within yourself, such as truth telling. The Alt-right is the first political movement in generations to have Virtue at its core. Because we’re the first political movement in generations to tell the truth.”—Dylan Bailey —” 1) The old republican party:evangelicals 2) The democratic party:anarchists (violence) 3) The new republican party:disenfranchised males “— Curt Doolittle —“Members of good families want nationalism, members of bad families universalism – in other words, they want a better family than made them.”–Curt Doolittle —“God is a hedge by the irresponsible against the failures of the self, providing absolution consistent with time preferences, and an excuse not to go seek achievement of their capacity.”— John Jost —“The politicians do not want us to tell the truth about Economics, politics, morality, and ethics. Because if we do they will be hung. There is no value in scale any longer. If polities are in conflict then separation is desirable. Different people need different norms and laws, and institutions to suit their levels of genetic distribution (development). This would decrease their power. We must always seek to decrease political power.”—
-
Soros v Hayek and Why.
Aug 22, 2016 2:48pm SOROS V HAYEK, AND WHY When where Soros disagrees with Hayek he relies on the criticism of the rational actor hypothesis, saying that people do not in fact act this way. But here again we have Hayek as a social scientist seeking rule of law, versus Soros as a financier seeking discretionary rule. The difference in the western heroic tradition and the Jewish tradition is illustrated once again: we peers may not interfere with the sovereignty of other peers with actions that interfere with their plans. Ergo: rule of law. Soros, as a cosmopolitan, seeks only to increase transactions regardless of the impact on the peerage, and the consequences to intertemporal capital. So yet again we see the metaphysics of the Aryans’ no harm to the commons, vs the Cosmopolitans’ maximum consumption. Hayek’s advocates do not know how to criticize Soros.
-
Soros v Hayek and Why.
Aug 22, 2016 2:48pm SOROS V HAYEK, AND WHY When where Soros disagrees with Hayek he relies on the criticism of the rational actor hypothesis, saying that people do not in fact act this way. But here again we have Hayek as a social scientist seeking rule of law, versus Soros as a financier seeking discretionary rule. The difference in the western heroic tradition and the Jewish tradition is illustrated once again: we peers may not interfere with the sovereignty of other peers with actions that interfere with their plans. Ergo: rule of law. Soros, as a cosmopolitan, seeks only to increase transactions regardless of the impact on the peerage, and the consequences to intertemporal capital. So yet again we see the metaphysics of the Aryans’ no harm to the commons, vs the Cosmopolitans’ maximum consumption. Hayek’s advocates do not know how to criticize Soros.
-
Yes. We Domesticated Ourselves. We’re Just Another Animal.
IT”S NOT LIKE I”M GONNA WIN A POPULARITY CONTEST FOR THIS LITTLE BIT OF TRUTH. You know, it’s not like if I walk around telling people ‘Well, we learned how to herd females, and domesticate one another so that we could cooperate more effectively, and that there isn’t any difference between now and then other than the complexity of the methods we use because rather than just genders and alphas we have entire classes and generations. We didn’t have to invent domestication of other animals. We’re the first animals we domesticated.
So (a) that all our cognitive differences are just a division of perception (b) our differences in perception and value are just reflections of reproductive strategy (c) we herded women and had to, and domesticated ourselves then the rest of the world (d) the only question is whether we continue domestication (eugenics) or we revert to animals (dysgenics). The west invented the most profitable and fastest way of domesticating human beings: markets in everything (empirical civilization – meaning meritocracy), and cull the herd with winters, starvation, pestilence, war, and aggressive hanging of malcontents. Yeah. Well, you know the optimum is a market society where we just limit the unproductive to one child. Eventually, this takes care of itself. And I think that’s the compromise that’s just as … necessary… as the institution of monogamous marriage, and rule of law. No one wants to be forced into marriage no one wants to be forced to limit herself to a single child, no one wants to be forced to contribute to the maintenance of defense, and no one wants to be prosecuted by the law for the imposition of costs upon others. It’s not a matter of want. Sigh.