Theme: Agency

  • Nina; Women seek (a) attention (b) empathizing (c) emotional reward (self assura

    Nina;

    Women seek (a) attention (b) empathizing (c) emotional reward (self assurance, suppression of neurorticism) (d) in time.

    Men seek (b) opportunity for productivity (b) systematizing (understanding), (c) capitalization, (d) over time.

    Feels in-time.
    Reals over-time.

    We could say one is better than the other but it’s just a division of labor between taking care of individuals in need vs organizing to supply the resources needed for all the polity irrespectively.

    Marriage is an optium agreement between the sexes. The incentives no longer favor marriage. The problem is children require at least both parents, and for mental health require male parents more than female.

    So we must solve this problem.

    Reply addressees: @moonlit_misfit


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 15:38:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720465560696238080

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662831614697652226

  • Her objective was to obtain attention by claiming she was worthy of attention. A

    Her objective was to obtain attention by claiming she was worthy of attention.

    Always seek to determine (a) what responsibility women are avoiding and (b) what attention they are trying to seek or avoid.

    Whatever else they are doing is just an excuse to demonstrate or pursue responsibilty evasion and obtain or evade attention.

    Once you see it (and baiting into hazard as well (seduction in social and political matters)) you can’t unsee it.

    Reply addressees: @MillionMustMeme @seracoate


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 15:29:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720463312448585728

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717914100532167145

  • “Why are we continually surprised by the level of evil women will do?”—Bryan W

    —“Why are we continually surprised by the level of evil women will do?”—Bryan
    We discussed this in a recent staff meeting because it was the most significant outstanding question in understanding the current crisis.

    And it turns out that while the ‘true nature of women’ was preserved until women were given the vote, it’s a western metaphysical, cultural, traditional presumption that began with women taking care of the farms (business) while men fought in the summers, through the medieval period’s attempt to domesticate men via chivalric ethics – which didn’t work until the rise of the middle class – through the victorian period that sought to domesticate the underclasses into middle class behavior as the industrial revolution took hold on society – through the progressive movement by the new england protestant women to advance the black vote, as precursor to advance the women’s vote – through the postwar NeoMarxist-Postmodern-Feminist sequence to undermine the west using women and minorities (just as they had with christianity).

    No other civilization lionizes women outside of their roles in family. And every other civilization except those that have followed our model (japan, korea) has maintained the traditional tradition of contraining women to the domain of emotions and outside of the demotions of management, government, and war.

    I’m still working on this question a bit, and I’ll continue until I’ve falsified it down to the sequence of first principles. But as far as I know, this answer (above) is correct. It’s one of the many reasons why the west differs so greatly from the rest, such that we are “W.E.I.R.D.” Because we gave women responsibility and held them to it at the level of their competency, and maintained laws and customs that prevented the exercise of their natural antisocial to antipolitical behavior. In other words, our laws and customs limiting female anti-social/anti-political behavior: the demand for agency without responsibility, and the demand for irresponsibilty in all things, by social wafare
    using “GSRRM” or the sequence of ‘undermining to canceling to sedition to treason’ – therby using the weapon they evolved to rally males against alphas so that women (or just females back then) could control their reproduction and mazimize the number of males from which they could extract resources.

    These laws and traditions we no longer enforce because of our hypothesis of an equality among humans that does not exist and cannot exist, and if it existed we would not only no longer be human – we would no longer be conscious beings, and we would regress to the bottom of the distribution – which is exactly what’s happening as women and their demand for irresponsibilty is propagated through the civilization through the democratic institutions without defense against the feminine instinct to promote anti-social to anti-political behaivor.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @bryanbrey @lporiginalg @DarnelSugarfoo


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 15:26:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720462492134969344

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720454144769556681

  • Selflessness and responsibility in my mirror. 😉

    Selflessness and responsibility in my mirror. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-02 17:44:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720134691649364151

    Reply addressees: @smugalongsmugly

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720133894815551908

  • Selfishness and irresponsibility is understandable

    Selfishness and irresponsibility is understandable.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-02 17:37:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720133033158701192

    Reply addressees: @smugalongsmugly

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720130107241590930

  • Like I have said so many times now. We all hold predictions of possibility given

    Like I have said so many times now. We all hold predictions of possibility given our perception of our own and other’s competency. You are the best that I know of at your level of competency. My competency is different and consists of a record larger scale. Our organization is maturing wonderfully. And the mainstream public, if aware of our ambitions will be challenged to disagree with theme. A smaller percentage of the population will agree with your proposition (I certainly do). So different perceptions of different scales. Both can work. And both can succeed. And they are not in contradiction.

    “Let a thousand nations bloom’”

    Reply addressees: @radiofreenw


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-02 17:08:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720125787787980800

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720124491102302541

  • THE MEANING OF SPIRIT, SOUL, MINDFULNESS,AND SACRED. The experience of ‘spirit’

    THE MEANING OF SPIRIT, SOUL, MINDFULNESS,AND SACRED.
    The experience of ‘spirit’ has a neurological origin we understand – as does ‘soul’, and as does ‘mindfulness’, and ‘sacred’. We know the ‘meaning’ of these terms and why humans have those instincts (intuitions) and needs (mindfulness).

    Humans have invented a whole series of method of achieving mindfulness, satisfying spirit and soul and the need for the sacred. We are just overly ‘saturated’ in the european christian and semitic religious framework instead of say the pre-chistian greco-roman, or the chinese confucian, or japanese ancestor worship.

    All of these are due to the human debt response (risk), and alienation (being left behind) response. Mindfulness (suppression of neuroticism) must be produced to overcome it as populations increase. It can be done by ritual, private or public, and usually through recitation. But effectively it’s training self regulation in pursuit of mindfulness, so that the spirit (intuition) is calm and confident, and the soul (record of rights and wrongs) do not agitate the spirit.

    The meaning of sacred is that we may not aggress against, impose upon, criticize or ridicule, use or abuse that which is sacred (without univeral punishment for doing so) – meaning we have no right to self satisfaction or expression in relation to the sacred. And this confidence in the absence of self interst creates the sacred, and the sacred provokes the spirit, and mindfulness out of habituation and indoctrination.

    Most means of minfulness achieve their ends by repetitiously training us into non-aggression, norms and traditions(systems of measurement), and tolerance for those sharing the same systems of measurement, thereby reducing opporutnities for conflict,aggression, and most especially retaliation – and the danger to all peoples of any scale of retaliation cyles, and worse, expanding retaliation cycles that lead to civil disturbance and civil war.

    The hard part is coming up with a means of mindfulness that satisfies the masculine and feminine mind, whether child, young adult, adult, or mature in age. And the harder part is coming up with something that isn’t false. Especially when we desire falsehood, magical thinking, and escape from the physical (scarcity), behavioral(self interest), and evolutionary (differences, natural selection).

    The greeks did it with stoicism. The chinese with confucianism. The Japanese with ancestor worship. The indians, and the middle east did it with organized religion. The africans with magical religion. Of these the greek is the least false and most scientific – but also most masculine. Because it maximizes individual responsibilty for one’s mind. HOwever, women evade responsibilty for their minds, and so to a small minority of men. And these people appear to need something ‘magical’ or social as an external force to produce self reguation that they can’t themselves.

    It’s just dog training for humans really.

    And it works.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @ArmoryOC


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-02 16:54:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720122135190896640

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720101670544363589

  • “It is not intuition if it is wrong.”– Um…. No. Intuition is a cognitive proc

    –“It is not intuition if it is wrong.”–
    Um…. No.

    Intuition is a cognitive process or an understanding that arises without conscious reasoning.

    The fact that we intuit (predict by auto association) has nothing to do with whether the prediction is true or false.

    The outcomes of intuition—meaning the decisions made or beliefs held as a result of intuition—can be evaluated for truthfulness or falsity based on whether they align with facts, correspondnce, or logical consistency.

    For instance, a person may have an intuitive feeling that a certain path through the woods is the correct one to reach a destination. Whether this intuitive decision is true (the path does lead to the destination) or false (the path does not lead to the destination) can be determined by following the path and seeing where it leads.

    Reply addressees: @BigSisterCynthi @Josh_Ebner @taylorburrowes @NoahRevoy


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-02 12:02:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720048821512663040

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719942452843557291

  • There is no purpose unless we make our survival of that heat death our purpose b

    There is no purpose unless we make our survival of that heat death our purpose by choice.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-01 19:58:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719806223275491388

    Reply addressees: @Gyeff0

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719805418644328875

  • Turtles all the way down. In the end if there is no purpose to the universe, the

    Turtles all the way down. In the end if there is no purpose to the universe, then there is only the accident of persistence by the concentration of energy in defeat of entropy.

    If I were to anthropomorphize a purpose of the universe, it would be that it’s a very wasteful process by which to attempt to calculate the transcendence of at least one life form into gods than can save the universe from heat death.

    Reply addressees: @Gyeff0


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-01 19:48:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719803537834549248

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719801411431485633