naturallawinstitute

Quite a bit of research on the subject. (Suggest Huntington) In the most reductive of terms: Chinese langauge is unforutnately good for poetry and analogy and not for logic or precision. English is the opposite. All germanics are the opposite. indo european langauges in general are the opposite. In technical terms this means chinese is a low precision high context language, and english is a high precision low context language. Even as such we can still separate philosophy into math, science, Logic, Rationalism, Reason, literature, and Myth....

Here is your answer: That which is least divergent from the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe, and as such produces proceeds that can be directed to the production of capitalizing (not consumptive) commons. ORDER – Order Produces Cooperation The ideal human order is an ethnically homogenous militia(really), wherein one is worthy of status and respect if and only if he serves (she births), and does one’s duty – regardless of rank....

—“I’m saying you need to have a coherent message that will appeal to our target audience. You also need to explain the core concepts of proletarianism in simple language (it’s not hard, I’ve done it before) and post it on your YouTube and Facebook. We need to spread the message fast before the civil war, we don’t have much time: four more years at most. Maybe you’ll surprise me, but you’ve proven yourself incapable of doing that....

As far as I know, this is the most correct, least wrong analysis of comparative civilizations: Asian civilization had naturally defensive boundaries, fewer competitors than all but the Indians, relative racial homogeneity easing Han conquest and integration, rice that produced more calories than wheat, natural rivers. But still, Asians stagnated and failed. Why? Asians practice delay and deceive warfare, harmony rather than market competition, face before truth rather than truth, family rather than commons, and failed to develop Rule of law that is necessary for market competition....

Well, you know, Islam destroyed and reduced to ashes, ignorance, superstition, illiteracy, poverty, and dysgenia, Every great civilization it infected: North African, Egyptian, Levantine, Mesopotamian, Persian, Northwest Indian (Indus), and SE Asian. All the arts, literature, thought, religions, institutions, laws, innovations, and tremendous cultural competition were destroyed and the world deprived of them. And worse, Muslims have killed over 1B people in doing so. And ‘curing’ Islamic influence in a population (say, southeast Europe) appears impossible – forever imprisoning people in ‘backwardness’....

Q: Why is Western civilization the only one worthy of leading humanity? I understand the question, but it is framed incorrectly. Let’s try to reframe it. If we mean lead as rule or govern, that’s clearly false. It’s clearly false because the indo Europeans disappeared whenever they tried to rule other peoples, rather than decimate and integrate, or exterminate and replace them. The reason being that the cost to Indo Europeans (“Aryans”) of transforming large populations such was tried by the Hittites in anatolia (1600bc), the indo-iranics in India (1500bc), the iranic-Persians in the middle east (~1500bc), all resulted in their eventual reverse-conquest by the majority peoples....

We use the terms Law, Philosophy, and Religion within the frame of european conceptual tradition. However, we use law(dispute resolution, command), philosophy(choice), and religion(mindfulness) for different purposes, and it is those purposes that civilizations share. What constitututes law, philosophy, and religion varies (enormously) across civilizations. Of these religion varies least, philosophy next, and law the most. It is perhaps useful to understand that the middle east conflated everything into monopoly religion, the Chinese conflated everything into family-state, and the Europeans separated everything into different ‘classes’ with competing elites....

—“Whiteness is just a technology; you can use it or not.”— Curt Doolittle (BRILLIANT) by James Krieger Whiteness (Europeanism) is a technology, yes, just as damns are technology. However, adoption & maintenance costs vary across human subspecies, & since the gains are incurred largely as a function of time, there is very little incentive for certain subspecies to adopt Europeanism – particularly subspecies known for hyperbolic discounting. Europeanism as technology does have the advantage of framing failure as a product of choice—‘the technology is there why don’t you use it?...

From The Patriotic Alternative https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/ SOURCE: https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/civic_nationalism_fraud? (Archived here for future use.) September 02, 2020 – Posted by Anglo Australian There are many people today who describe themselves (or are described by others) as civic nationalists. Some of these people include Donald Trump, Nigel Farage and Tommy Robinson. These people claim (or are claimed by others) to be fighting against globalism using the weapon of civic nationalism. It all sounds good, but there’s just one problem....

In Response to “Approaching The Third Rail with Eric Weinstein” Neither of you ever include conservative (aristocratic, martial) ethnic european (white) intellectuals in your discussions. 😉 I want to solve the problem of racial conflict. Do you. At what cost? Your denial of the demonstrated evidence, and the explanatory science in order evade the cost of solving the problem is the only reason we can’t solve it – because the solution is not all that difficult – although it comes at a psychological cost: acceptance of status (positional) differences in sexual, social, economic, political, and evolutionary markets outgroup vs ingroup....