naturallawinstitute

You will have a problem understanding me because I teach formal logic of juridical science. I do not teach contemporary proceduralism, which consists of legal pseudoscience operating under the sophistry of positive law – in violation of 5000 years of european (eugenic) tradition. —What exactly do you think a law is?— It’s not a question of think. It’s a question of KNOW. There is only one law possible, that is tort (trespass)....

The Chinese are (a) conducting total war (evolution), (b) politically organized for that evolution (c) planning by the century for it, (d) strategically investing in doing it, (e) genetically engineering it, (f) suppressing resistance to it (islam, judeo-globalism, liberalism). The Japanese and the Koreans are adapting to the end of modernity by retaining their genetic, cultural, and political advantages, and automating away the non-problem of declining population in a century where smaller wealthier populations and state organization is necessary....

You may or may not notice but unlike all other conservative (european) intellectuals I don’t use shallow (pathetic) moralizing. I simply state the economics of any given question, illustrating the theft, fraud, or deceit (CRIME). I don’t play word games. I DO JUDGEMENTS OF LAW. This is why Europeans (Right) failed to resist the Jewish (Left) war on Europeans. Because you practiced Christian Dogma (sophistry), enlightenment ‘philosophy’ (pseudoscience) and shallow sentimental moralizing, rather than prosecution by simple scientific, common law of tort...

Nietzche identified slave morality, reminded us of our ancient ‘values’, and provided a continental(childish) fantasy ‘psychology’ for our restoration – in typical german fashion using a secular theology. Instead, the answer was in our ancient law, not faith, myth or ‘values’.

Trifunctionalism: the balance of powers between masculine (dominance) war, neutral (reciprocity) law, and feminine (submissive) faith, has is 5000 years old. Our FIRST LAW of self-determination made competition between the elites necessary. So LAW not Man, force or faith rules. Sorry, but Scientific thought is the optimum cognitive paradigm, Rule of Law by the Natural Law of reciprocity is the optimum political paradigm, Christian ethics are the optimum social paradigm....

THE CONFLICT The West was undermined by both the Jewish pseudoscientific revolt against the Darwinian explanation for outsized european success, and Islamic supernatural invasion given the opportunity created by Jewish undermining of our three organizing cults of Army, Law-Science, and Xanity. The religious right isn’t right at all. It’s traditionally been communist. The difference is that the leftists have moved from supernatural theology to pseudoscientific dogma, displaced the church, taken over the academy(church) and pulpit(media, education) and disempowered them....

In America, we have corrupt global elites, politicians dependent on them, deep state employed and empowered by them, and an attempted communist (democratic party, leftists, globalist) takeover in progress, with ‘people who work for a living’ (Right, meritocracy) against them. In the Ukrainian Revolution 1.Mass Assembly in near the govt. bldgs. 2.Barricading the roads with tires, filling them with rubble – bulletproof. 3.Small number of nationalists fight, take buildings. “visit” police, politicians, at home....

—“[Ukraine’ Maidan] was a coup by intel but I’ll never tell by whom.”– Not really. Intel isn’t that smart or influential. It’s just smarter than State and Defense. 😉 Everyone everywhere was surprised and exploited the opportunity. But it was the oligarchs that really brought it into being. The EU or Russia would destroy them. They couldn’t afford another other scenario than the status quo, and the Ukrainan people still suffer for no reason because of it....

Weinstein (Geometry, physics, economics), Taleb (financial modeling), Mandelbrot (computation) and I, Doolittle, (AI simulation, law, and econ) all discovered the same problems with 20th century thought, and Joscha Bach is the only other person that appears to understand fully: ‘Mathiness’. (Difference is I didn’t, and still don’t, care for public attention, and only tolerate it for the purpose of solving the crisis of our age.) To understand mathiness (mathematical sophistry), It’s more important that you understand the operational foundations of mathematics, what’s possible and not with mathematics as we understand it, what the ‘next’ mathematics would consist of – than it matters HOW TO DO THAT MATH....

Why did females develop verbal and social superpredation by undermining and conflict generation, using gossiping, rallying, outraging, shaming, moralizing, psychologizing, projecting, fictionalizing? Why did males develop physical and political superpredation by violence (truth)? Answer? Weakness vs Strength. Why did the Europeans and East Asians institutionalize military, state or law, reciprocity, markets, eugenics? Same reason. Why did the Jews institutionalize the female means of adversarial competition as their group strategy instead? Same reason....