naturallawinstitute

MB expanded to a similar number of questions as B5 would remain useful – for the workplace. B5 including empathy-systematizing would explain the difference in facets (subtraits) which vary by sex. So no it’s not bullshit. it teaches normal folk to think about motivations. I worked on this question, and the delta between Big Five and MB is trivial. And it’s due to the low number of MB questions(stability of results) & B5 includes neuroticism vs MB includes empathy-systematizing....

-“Segregation causes racism.”-Bret Weinstein @BretWeinstein BRETT: FALSE Proximity causes conflict. That’s the science. Why? a) ingroup preference (kin selection) b) the advantage of ingroup preference (cooperative discounts) c) large differences in the genetic distribution of ability between groups (class sizes) d) resulting divergence in manners, ethics, morals, norms e) resulting competition between imposition of behavioral costs. f) resulting resistance to outgroup parasitism. g) resulting parasites justify parasitism h) organizers of parasitism benefit from developing clientele (leftism)...

I would love to explain mathematics to Roger – it would annoy the daylights out of him – because his platonism would be eradicated forever. ( insert nonsense response from moron here) Roger is a mathematical platonist. Most mathematical platonists – including Roger – lack the vocabulary to evolve to join the computational (operational) revolution of ‘sciencing’ mathematics. Leaving behind set (ideal and verbal) foundations and converting to operational (real) foundations....

Most concise, accurate explanation of Nietzsche. (I completely agree). My view is that Nietzche diagnosed the illness failed to discover the cure. We have. But then P-Law & Homo Deus force us to face the mirror.

 -“P-law has the effect of being so intellectually inaccessible and dense initially that it discourages a person from trying; then when you learn it, it mysteriously is perceived as almost too simple to believe. Yet, it’s still understood as complex. … That’s been my experience.”- TruthQuest

Woke is a desperate attempt to preserve the pseudoscientific anti-Darwinian movement. IQ, Sex, Class, Race differences are all true. BUT, due to delta in underclass size and resulting culture – and a problem of CLASS, kin-preference, culture, immigration, integration – not race. Sex value of Race(neoteny) will exist. Kin bias will exist. Power-seeking by kin bias will exist. But differences in political demand by kin preference are due to differences in size of classes....

Sorry, but the ‘hard problem’ of consciousness is solved. It’s taken me a year and a half to figure out how to explain it but once you understand it, like many things, it’s not a hard problem at all – it’s rather simple and obvious. (Philosophers look like idiots in retrospect.) Funny, but computational irreducibility (the inability to provide a mathematical description for some phenomena), isn’t any different from the impossibility of introspection....

… He’s all over the place. If all he’s saying is ‘in the mind of man, all things are measured by the body, emotions, and mind of man” then that’s fine. If he’s saying that “all understanding must be computationally reducible to some linguistic sequence – well that’s true”. If he’s saying that operational (scientific) descriptions are necessary to eliminate ignorance, error, bias, and deceit, but that those descriptions are reductions of subjective experience then that’s true....

In response to: I should publish a paper on this subject as yet another of the many problems of mathematical idealism(analogy) vs mathematical operationalism (reality). Because “i”, just as |absolute value|, solves a problem of ambiguity in mathematics: the language and logic of positional names. Sabine correctly identifies the convenient use of “i” in simplifying oscillations (geometry). But why can’t we identify the square root of negative one as negative one?...

Of course we know what consciousness consists of. We’ve known for at least the past ten years. The effort of teaching the average person enough neurology so that can they understand it is a bit of work, but I’m producing a course on it, and the research is all out there. Even a populist like Michio Kaku answers the question. Kuhn makes a living NOT answering the question of consciousness, and interviewing marginal characters (mostly old folks) and many of whom are intellectually embarrassing (philosophers and theologians) – thereby preserving the supernatural bias in the majority population while satisfying curiosity among both materialists, idealists, and supernaturalists....