naturallawinstitute

IQ attempts to measure (g) which is your neurological response time. That’s it. It’s very simple. How much information does it take for you to identify a pattern and evolve a neurological connection before exhaustion of the pathways? It’s that simple. IQ is a predictor of not FAILING. Conscientiousness is more influential in success. We have this emphasis backwards. We have at least four faculties: Body, Intuition(Brain), Conscientiousness(Mind), and Intelligence(Reason), You can train body (fitness), brain (anti-neuroticism(mindfulness)), conscientiousness (discipline), and intelligence (education) – and we don’t – we pretend that people don’t need training in every one of those faculties....

–“How can a government, that’s $28 trillion in debt, spend trillions of dollars that it does not have? Well, one major way is the Federal Reserve creates money-out-of-thin-air and then ‘loans’ it to the government by buying the government’s bonds.”– Ron Paul RON: Serious Questions: What right do savers have to the preservation of the purchasing power of a fiat currency? What right do lenders have to the preservation of the purchasing power of debt+interest?...

NOTES: (General Criticisms, not of Prof Toombs, but in general, of the 20th-century social pseudosciences including that of economics and law. The interesting question is why did we begin pseudosciences in parallel with darwin and why did we evolve so many pseudosciences in the postwar period? ) “Correctly Describe How The Engine Works” = Circular Argument(sophistry). “Why do we need an engine at all?” = Science (Decidability). Natural Law = Cooperation = Self Determination, Sovereignty, Reciprocity (Law) – within the limits of Proportionality (Legislation)....

Note to Jeffrey Kaplan – USC; Jeffrey – I doubt few people, whether in the audience or even in the discipline, understand how well you communicate this subject. We should note that these theorists: Bentham, Austin, Rez, Kelsen, Hart, Dworkin, and Rawls all justify (make excuses) for positive law (commands). While Blackstone Hayek, Epstein, and Scalia are all making scientific explanations of the law. And does the audience know the difference between the justificationary (sophistry) and the scientific (operational)?...

Survival … Action … … Self Determination … … … Natural Law (Science) … … … … Rule of Law (Science) … … … … … Rights, Obligations, and Inalienations (Science) … … … … … … Constitutional Law (Procedure) … … … … … … … Legislation (Contracts) … … … … … … … … Regulation (Implementation) … … … … … … … … … Judgements (Application)...

Fairness consists of reciprocity (incentive to cooperation without retaliation) within the limits of proportionality (sufficient disincentive to defect). Rule of law of self-determination by sovereignty, reciprocity, and proportionality (natural rights) leaves humans with only survival possible as markets for reciprocal cooperation. As such rule of law, reciprocity, and markets, and market survival and success are not UNJUST. However, some people are genetically unfit for markets, and as such their incentive to defect (crime, demand for political redistribution, demand for political rebellion, or demonstrated migration)....

 “Intersectionality is the study of genetic unfitness.”

DEFINITION: JUSTICE: the definition is possible: restitution of reciprocity within the limits of proportionality, where reciprocity determines the limit of cooperation before retaliation against the actor, and the limit of proportionality determines the incentive to defect from the group. Where reciprocity and proportionality are impartially determined without bias( favoritism or discrimination ). Justice can be performed but not ‘felt’ when a diversity of genetic quality produces a diversity of ability necessitating the dependence of a domesticated animal....

—” The answer to Marc’s question is “no.” None of these people who have made attacking Critical Race Theory their life’s work HAVE ANY IDEA WHAT CRITICAL RACE THEORY IS!!!!” —Joy-Ann (Pro-Democracy) Reid @JoyAnnReid Yes, we do. Absolutely positively do. It’s an attempt to overthrow white civilization and its rapid innovation, adaptation, and evolution by self-determination, sovereignty, rule of law, reciprocity, markets, and meritocracy because people of color cannot compete in those markets....

Female: Consumption-Empathizing -vs- Male: Capitalizing-Producing. —@curtdoolittle Weaponized Consumption – communism Weaponized Empathizing – socialism Weaponized Capitalizing – fascism Weaponized Producing – oligarchy/corporatism/globalism Without Natural Law Reciprocity these strategies, intended to benefit commons, turn self-serving and undermine commons. —@LukeWeinhagen