naturallawinstitute

—“Hypothesis: SAT has become more coachable as revisions eliminated the hardest-to-coach material (e.g., analogies). Asians invest more in practice (besides their latent cognitive advantage) than any other ethnic group. If the College Board weren’t so secretive, we could test it.”–Charles Murray @charlesmurray Charles: Yes, and something else we see in personality testing vs IQ testing: that life differences emerge in modeling(space, time, prediction) not knowledge and calculation. And by seeking homogeneity in IQ testing they’ve eliminated what ‘matters’ in life’s market competition....

WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE? DIFFERENCES a) Competition: Without competition (comparison, differences) we have no means of distinction and without distinction we cannot make a choice. Forms of competition: b) Constant Relations: Referrers, Properties, relations, and values are determined by marginally indifferent, comparable, or commensurable Constant Relations vs Inconstant Relations between states. |Comparable|: Identical > Indifferent(in context/limits) > Marginally Indifferent > comparable > commensurable(via intermediary measure) > incommensurable (different) DECIDABILITY DECIDABLE: a) In the REVERSE: a question (statement) is DECIDABLE if an algorithm (set of operations) exists within the limits of the system (rules, axioms, theories) that can produce a decision (choice)....

THE SCIENCE ‘PROBLEM’ Science just means due diligence in the production of warrantable, liable, testimony to observables. The question is, how much science meets those criteria of testimony, and how much of it would be subject to something either untestifiable or worse, perjury? The correct response to any scientific (materialst) explanation of the laws of the universe, and our absolute irrelevance in it, is that while experience may emerge from the material, the informational content of experience is greater than exists prior to given experience....

A Devil would tell us a half-truth, with an impossible, unwarrantable, unredeemable promise, using plausible deniability, freedom from liability, the result of which was a failure to discover, apply, and evolve with the word and laws of God. What is that word of God, written every weave of the universe? The word of God is ‘evolve‘.

I don’t like to stomp on Haidt’s tweets but there is a reason for this shift and it’s the postwar intellectual immigrant’s attack on western civilization, and this group is now learning the cost of their naivety and why they have historically been a failed people – at our cost. We have paid the extremely high cost of restoring European thought internally from 1200 onward, and externally since the French, German, Russian, Ashkenazi and now Muslim and Chinese counter-revolution....

— “Enlist the Christian cognitively masculine by appealing to their interest in Truth. Many of them are alpha males suppressed by sophistry of Tolerance. They are ready for Reformation in which Tolerance has been knocked down as a totem.” — Freedom Of Religion (a) the freedom of religion clause has failed the test of Judaism and Islam (b) religion is a method of warfare on behalf of a group evolutionary strategy....

THE SIN OF VANITY – THE RIGHT FAILS BECAUSE THEY WANT TO ‘BE RIGHT’ MORE THAN THEY WANT TO WIN — “Somebody call BLM. We need to get curt to give up his megaphone so he can stroke their egos with “y’all are stronger and have bigger dicks!” — –“The real action is in the reaction of the opposition.” — Saul Alinsky Be mindful of how you react to your enemy....

WHO ARE YOU AND HOW DO YOU EXIST? IT”S PRETTY SIMPLE REALLY “You” are a stack of hierarchically recursive memory on top of pulsing sensors – each layer increasing the duration of time, detecting changes in the layer beneath, integrating memory at the same level, and passing predictions to the next layer. ‘Slow’ chemistry makes it work. “You” emerge from this hierarchy, but can only introspect (look backward into) what the competition between predictions in that hierarchy of memory wins your attention by providing the greatest returns on ‘acquisition’ of something – even if it’s just rest....

THE RIGHTS ‘COGFEM’ ARE THE RIGHT’S JEWS – UNDERMINING VICTORY We need to run with this message long-term to generate self-awareness of RIGHT behavior: — “It was a reference to curt criticising your and the the rights tendency in general to purity spiral. As in X isn’t perfect so tear it down even of it hurts the right.” — COGFEM: Division of Interests, Narrow Knowledge, Case-Overplay, Demand for Self-Satisfaction on Narrow Terms, Doubling Down rather than adapting, Purity Spiraling, Undermining....

Notes: NOTES Aaron has too limited an understanding of American ethical history. 😉 See “Carpetbaggers”. Innovation is possible in both Capitalizing-Productive and Decapitalizing-Parasitic directions. The purpose of rule of law under the old germanic and remaining anglo common law, is to evolve the law empirically in response to the discovery of consumptive-parasitic directions. Law evolves to suppress irreciprocity so that the central government can capture the taxes necessary to suppress local parasitism rents and free-riding....