Source: Twitter X

  • MYTHICISM IN THE ABRAHAMIC TRADITION VS HISTORY IN THE EUROPEAN TRADITION |VERSU

    MYTHICISM IN THE ABRAHAMIC TRADITION VS HISTORY IN THE EUROPEAN TRADITION

    |VERSUS|: Europeans: Aristocracy, History and Natural Law
    vs
    Semites: Priesthood, Mythicism and Authoritarian Law.

    Context (Origins)
    Much of the mythicism in the Abrahamic tradition is relatively recent (between the 2nd century BCE and the 1st century AD) aligns with the period of Hellenistic influence and the formation of key texts and ideas in Judaism and early Christianity.
    During this time, Jewish thought was influenced by Greek philosophy, and significant religious literature, including the Dead Sea Scrolls and the apocryphal and pseudepigraphal writings, was produced.
    This period also saw the development of the Pharisaic and early Rabbinic traditions, which further shaped Jewish and Christian religious thought.

    Mythicism (Covey Meaning Produced by Others)
    Mythicism refers the production of fictional history by incorporating events, people, myths, legends, loading, framing, and propaganda. The audience is left with the responsibility of interpreting these figures or stories as symbolic, allegorical, or fictional, rather than as real, historical events or individuals. Mythicism was, historically the interpretation of ‘wisdom literatures’ produced by mythicism especially among south eurasians from the west coast of north africa to the east coast of India. The Chinese chose a philosophy of harmony (social), and somewhat mythologized the past. The europeans chose rational (legal, political) philosophy and sought to produce history (legal evidence).

    Properties of Mythicism:
    – Symbolic Interpretation: Mythicism interprets religious or historical narratives as symbolic or allegorical, often conveying deeper truths or cultural values.
    – Skeptical of Historicity: Mythicists often question or deny the historical existence of certain figures (e.g., Jesus Christ in some versions of Jesus myth theory).
    – Cultural and Religious Context: Myths are seen as products of their cultural and religious contexts, reflecting the beliefs, values, and practices of the people who created them.
    – Narrative Structure: Mythic narratives often involve supernatural elements, deities, or heroes, and serve to explain natural phenomena, human behavior, or cultural traditions.

    History (Derive Meaning Yourself From Evidence)
    History consists of the study of past events, particularly those involving human activities, societies, and civilizations. It is based on the critical analysis of evidence such as documents, artifacts, and other records, aiming to reconstruct and understand past realities.

    Properties of History:
    – Empirical Evidence: Historical study relies on empirical evidence, including written records, archaeological findings, and other material artifacts.
    – Methodological Rigor: Historians use critical methods to evaluate sources, verify facts, and construct coherent narratives about the past.
    – Focus on Actual Events: History seeks to document and explain real events and developments, distinguishing between factual occurrences and fictional or mythological accounts.
    – Contextual Analysis: Historical analysis involves understanding events within their broader social, economic, political, and cultural contexts.

    Comparison of Mythicism vs History
    – Basis: Mythicism often interprets narratives as symbolic or fictional, while history focuses on factual, evidence-based accounts of past events.
    – Purpose: Myths typically serve to convey moral, philosophical, or cultural lessons, whereas history aims to provide an accurate and coherent account of what actually happened.
    – Methodology: Mythic interpretation relies on literary and cultural analysis, while historical study employs empirical research, source criticism, and contextual examination.

    Cheers
    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 20:09:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790474555003166720

  • Sorry. Missed the last sentence. Yes, you’ are correct. You’re correct almost al

    Sorry. Missed the last sentence. Yes, you’ are correct.
    You’re correct almost all the time.
    Which is what I say, almost all the time. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 19:50:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790469870519255531

    Reply addressees: @radiofreenw

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790468587263508725

  • In economics we jokingly refer to competition as “coopera-tition”. After all , w

    In economics we jokingly refer to competition as “coopera-tition”. After all , what is the difference between market competition and non-market conflcit?


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 19:49:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790469612431106533

    Reply addressees: @radiofreenw

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790468587263508725

  • Well that’s an origination by assumption on your part. That is not what aristotl

    Well that’s an origination by assumption on your part. That is not what aristotle or aquinas or the scholastics, or blackstone, or the founders where thinking.

    It’s that we should make laws that improve the police that are empirically discovered and rationaly explained by the evidence of human behavior in both failures and successes of cooperation.

    In other words, it’s a claim that legal legitimacy is the product of empirical evidence not of arbitrary discretion of a ruler.

    (which gets us back to your and my difference of opinion on the meaning of authority – a meaning that I keep open just because I enjoy it so much. 😉 )

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @radiofreenw


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 19:28:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790464204027097088

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790463224275444219

  • WE ONLY NEED TO AGREE TO MOVE PORTIONS OF CONSERVATIVES IN ROUGHLY THE RIGHT DIR

    WE ONLY NEED TO AGREE TO MOVE PORTIONS OF CONSERVATIVES IN ROUGHLY THE RIGHT DIRECTION -NOTHING MORE.

    Look. We don’t all need to be the same, just gradually moving in the same general direction. Is any given media activist moving the needle forward? Yes. Has he used this hypersensitivity (that’s what conservatives do) to threats to reach a broad audience of those who are equally sensitive? Yes.

    The truth is, and I know from his explanation of Stew’s strategy to me, that he knows exactly what he is doing and why and has researched the options thoroughly and applied them to reach a bigger audience that is more passionate and more likely to ACT than I can, or you can or the rest of us ASDs can.

    So don’t look for people to cognitively, emotionally, and intellectually resonate with you. Instead, look for people who move some part of the spectrum that will actually SHOW UP in the direction necessary to bring about change.

    He’s doing it.

    And frankly he’s one of the smarter people that regularly interviews me, and he grasps what I’m saying. And as such he brings my ideas to a broader audience, legitimizing those ideas with people who otherwise wouldn’t be able to judge them on their own.

    I will work with anyone for whom I can provide value in moving the needle in the right direction. I don’t need them to agree with me or me to agree with them to any greater degree than that: move forward in the right direction.

    This “you have to think like me” is the reason conservatives and on the right fail – because the left isn’t infected with this disability.

    Cheers
    CD

    Reply addressees: @CamoDiver


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 19:25:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790463540953780224

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790460312254095524

  • Because I did not (in either of you) recognize the source of the problem until I

    Because I did not (in either of you) recognize the source of the problem until I saw both you and Doug using it together. You’re important to me so I don’t push back on certain biases or shifts. And It’s often hard for me to distinguish your reasons for deviation from what I work on as something you’re emotionally working through because of local history and circumstance, or whether you’re missing what I’m saying. Usually if you’ve identified something you’re missing in what I’m saying it teaches me to refine my definitions and explanations.

    This is just one more of those times. 😉

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @radiofreenw


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 19:14:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790460762760069120

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790459600002539746

  • Theology is dead. It’s left for just the weak. We had already passed through phi

    Theology is dead. It’s left for just the weak. We had already passed through philosophy. ANd now we live in a world of testifiability: science.

    You are done. Sorry. Time has left you behind. Just like genetics economics and political influence have left you behind.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 19:09:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790459369038999675

    Reply addressees: @finishedyet34

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790445739039961212

  • I speak from demonstrated ability, knowledge, and achievement, and you are offen

    I speak from demonstrated ability, knowledge, and achievement, and you are offended as is usual by being an underclass when confronted with the brutal honesty of your betters.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 19:07:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790459012946829712

    Reply addressees: @finishedyet34

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790446420845019304

  • I”m English (anglo american) though genetically there is no difference between n

    I”m English (anglo american) though genetically there is no difference between northern France (normandy) and southern England, and little difference between them and Belgium, the Low Countries, and Denmark.

    While raised by a Breton French Catholic mother, and an english protestant father, given the family traditions, I am pretty much a Church of England protestant new England American descendent of puritans and the English middle and upper middle classes.

    I’m also an arrogant elitist snob, but at least I seek to help the little people and save them from the enemy. 😉

    Reply addressees: @finishedyet34


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 19:06:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790458730598805504

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790446723883749534

  • FIXING THE COMMON CONFUSION OF “LAWS OF NATURE” WITH “NATURAL LAW” OF COOPERATIO

    FIXING THE COMMON CONFUSION OF “LAWS OF NATURE” WITH “NATURAL LAW” OF COOPERATION
    Both you(Doug) and Martin have an odd habit of confusing the Laws of Nature(persistence) with the natural law (of cooperation).

    I realize that the terms “laws of nature” and “Natural Law” are easily confused, but they originate in the sequence of discovered “Laws of Nature” and THUS discovered “Natural Law” of Cooperation, to use as court common and legislative law, as the terms of social, economic, and political cooperation, making possible the defeat those laws through cooperation at political and economic and strategic scales.

    Now I know that intuitionistically this is an attractive conflation (falsehood) because it allows you to apply the naturalistic fallacy of the brutality of the laws of nature to the ‘benefits’ of the natural law of cooperation (sovereignty, reciprocity, duty, truth, excellence, and beauty): in other words, non aggression against demonstrated (earned) interests (assets).

    But this is not only just a fallacy, but it is a falsehood, and it undermines the Natural Law just as the Abrahamics and the Marxists and the general feminine Left seek to undermine all terms, and redefine them as what they are not: social construction of falsehood: Lying. 😉

    Hugs to you both.
    Two of my favorite people whom I respect the most.
    But you know, what y’all are doing ‘isn’t right’. 😉

    CD

    Reply addressees: @radiofreenw @AutistocratMS


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 19:01:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790457495296626688

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790447314856755604