Source: Twitter X

  • WHAT KIND OF COACHING, COUNSELING, THERAPY, MEDICAL CARE DO YOU NEED (riffing of

    WHAT KIND OF COACHING, COUNSELING, THERAPY, MEDICAL CARE DO YOU NEED
    (riffing off a friend’s post)

    Having been on the spectrum and worked my way thorough it I’ve had plenty of experience with the mental health industry – more positive than negative but the negative was VERY…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-16 17:36:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1791160777107226744

    Reply addressees: @al_masani_royal @NoahRevoy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1791146845642838361

  • WHAT KIND OF COACHING, COUNSELING, THERAPY, MEDICAL CARE DO YOU NEED (riffing of

    WHAT KIND OF COACHING, COUNSELING, THERAPY, MEDICAL CARE DO YOU NEED
    (riffing off a friend’s post)

    Having been on the spectrum and worked my way thorough it I’ve had plenty of experience with the mental health industry – more positive than negative but the negative was VERY negative. So my work on AI , neuroscience, and cognitive science has given me insights into the failings of the field. And I see the industry as unfortunately needing to continue to transition (reform) out of the hole it dug itself into prior to 2000 – for over a century – just at a tie when our people need it more than at any time in history.

    Coaching, Therapy, Psychiatry, and Behavioral Modification by everything from ‘suggestion’, to repetition, to shocks, to hallucinogenics to surgery can work. πŸ˜‰

    IMO the various versions of ketamine are the most effective, fast, and durable means of altering negative thoughts and their consequences. But I doubt that we will ever escape the need for pharmaceuticals if modern levels of stress across the spectrum aren’t alleviated through ‘ritual’ meaning ‘training’ means, early enoug in life to serve as a prophylactic.

    So:
    (1) Coaching (enhancement therapy) is almost always effective if you find someone who can sympathize with your cognitive and emotional framework. I have a problem with this term because some people are in fact therapists and others are simply randomly adopting this term as ‘advisors’ or ‘friendly advice you pay for’. So I would rather see a new field between coaching and therapy. But at present the problem is determining the criteria for licensing someone to use that term.

    (2) Therapy (corrective therapy) is a systematic process of suggestion, training, and education, and can be effective but it is more dependent on sympathy with your frameworks than is coaching – and about 80% of therapists are just bad at it, and of the remaining 20%, most are using outdated feminine paradigms, when people like Noah Revoy (coaching) and Taraban (therapy) have completed the transition of the industry out of that debilitating infantilizing depressing model of therapy. I use therapy like most people use the doctor. When I have a problem and I don’t want to burden family, friends, girlfriend, wife, business partners etc, I just make an appointment and usually I can work thorugh ordinary life issues in as few as three weeks, and as long as a couple of months.

    3) Psychiatry works just fine, though the same 80/20 rule applies, but the ‘filtering’ process given that it’s effectively a medical degree will often produce better talent at a higher cost.

    Within Psychiatry the following techniques work just fine, Why? Because you’re trying to cause different neural pathways to organize – and neurons are plastic – and can adapt if you find a way to adapt them, when prevarication and obsession on stressors trauma and other odd behaviors and depressions continually reinforce those networks.

    So to alter your behavior you have to ‘overstimulate’ some other neural network in order to ‘bypass’ and develop different networks of association:
    … (1) Hypnotherapy etc: though there are genetic reasons some of us are more or less susceptible to suggestion. This is a very ‘light touch’ means of altering the behavior of some people in the population.
    … (2) Cognitive Behavioral Therapy will adjust minor oddities like irrational fears by repetitions of exposure to the stresses until you’ve trained some network or other to interpret it as other than a risk. (BTW: fear of heights is genetic, sorry.)
    … (3) Shock Therapy such as cold therapy as stated above works for trauma and should try it first.
    … (4) Ketamine therapy (or any related version) will almost certainly work for depression and trauma
    … (5) Pharmaceuticals will work if either a) you need an immediate relief (xanax etc), (b) or it’s a biological rather than trauma problem such as social anxiety, panic disorders, chronic depression, in my case autistic difficulty switching topics, and many cases of ADD (which would not exist if most boys were not forced to sit in chairs in classrooms)
    … (6) and even surgery can be required in some extreme cases – (sarcasm:) Even though it appears that the use of lobotomy hasn’t been fully suppressed given the number of radical leftists out there…. πŸ˜‰

    Personal: Pharmaceuticals do work. The problem is they can also hurt you – and often irreversibly. (I had a lighter version of the same reaction as Jordan Peterson). It’s not good.) πŸ˜‰ I’m perfectly happy without OCD and ADD medication. However, it seems to annoy the heck out of people around me now and then. Because while it’s a profound asset at times, the inability to switch contexts or even ‘hear’ or pay attention to others is just, well annoying to them. πŸ˜‰

    Hope this helps someone.
    Cheers
    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-16 17:36:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1791160776750739456

  • (you’re correct of course.) πŸ˜‰

    (you’re correct of course.) πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-16 17:00:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1791151666307227992

    Reply addressees: @orion_pulse @Lipebarc

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1791150472994357391

  • OMG I LOVE CHATGPT and I LOVE 4OMINI EVEN MORE! I can easily ask for responses (

    OMG I LOVE CHATGPT and I LOVE 4OMINI EVEN MORE!
    I can easily ask for responses (a) that are the detail I need for my research (b) or that are in ‘the style of Curt Doolittle’ (which it’s amazing at composing – and it’s properly dense and causal), (c) or to ignore my style and my custom instructions, and just provide a response for the general audience. (d) and anyone else can ask for it to write for some other education level (I write, at least in my work, at postgrad reading levels.)

    Seriously. There are a few times in my life where the quality of at least the research side of my life has been dramatically improved by a development in tech and CHATGPT4 has to be … well, it’s up there.

    I mean, I started programming on a teletype machine. I had a tandy color computer, a compaq ‘portable, a series of ibm clones 300 baud modems, dial up and compuserve. We had Novell and Ipx networking, and was helpful, but that’s all. And we had Desqview (multiple windows) on MS-DOS was such an improvement. Relational databases were .. well, that was what it took to make money. πŸ˜‰ I really didn’t care about much of the tech stack after that because it was just amaking entry into the tech sector easy, but wasn’t a big improvement in quality of life.

    Windows was ‘nice’ because it could present graphics, but all it did was slow down the number of lines of writing and code I produced per day, week, and month. πŸ˜‰

    The internet wasn’t really that valuable UNTIL the information was gradually added to it – and when all the research papers and books were added (thank you google books), google scholar, and all those that followed – that was, a huge leap.

    I mean, if your work in ONE discipline accessing the stream of information isn’t that difficult. But if you work in multiple CROSS disciplinary synthesis it was almost impossible and expensive.

    But today I can work with perplexity for reseach, gpt4omni for synthesis, and Claude Opus at times (which is a little bit better at textual composition – but it can’t write in my style like GPT4 can. So I have to rewrite everything.

    The voice side of new GPT is a ‘ok’ but I have to train it to give me quick, and brief responses. πŸ˜‰ That said, i doubt I’ll ever prefer voice over text except for trivial questions while I”m working.

    Anyway.
    Thank you Openai. πŸ˜‰

    #openai


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-16 16:59:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1791151571524292608

  • (exactly). πŸ˜‰ But here is the issue, and the issue I made to MSFT back in 05-06:

    (exactly). πŸ˜‰
    But here is the issue, and the issue I made to MSFT back in 05-06: The only reason we can advertise on search is because we can’t get the answer we really want. SO… google can continue to protect the cash cow of advertising on search, but it’s very hard to do when you get the right answer, and especially if the answer is delivered by voice. Moreover, MSFT etc doesn’t need to make money by search. So, what if they produce better search and don’t use advertising? What happens to Google search? Google search is dominant because of habit. I use bing becaues it’s less noisy and biased. What if bing is even less noisy and biased, and advertising is all but non-existent? Because an LLM for search, even current moment search, is not difficult to build (look how fast Musk did it), and so Google’s moat doesn’t really exist if someone else wants to repeat the process of microsoft putting mozilla out of biz by giving the browser away. And google giving chrome away simply by divorcing the tech from the msft stack.

    Reply addressees: @orion_pulse


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-16 15:57:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1791135920386658304

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1791127361712206034

  • AI WILL REPEAT THE PROCESS OF DEVOURING. πŸ˜‰ Internet and search DEVOURED yellow

    AI WILL REPEAT THE PROCESS OF DEVOURING. πŸ˜‰
    Internet and search DEVOURED yellow pages (100%) and most of advertising (62%). Now AI is very likely to devour search and very possibly…. online advertising. Which, might not be so good, given that it’s advertising that funded radio > television > internet > all the free tools google has given us because of that advertising.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-16 13:55:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1791105217385140224

  • Thank you. Will do. πŸ˜‰

    Thank you. Will do. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-16 13:15:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1791095028544123251

    Reply addressees: @dbabbitt

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1791060688074383829

  • Not unless biden has a teleprompter and a radio in his ear

    Not unless biden has a teleprompter and a radio in his ear.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-16 08:19:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1791020558559191418

    Reply addressees: @harryjsisson

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790907365090328606

  • that only means specifying the scope of crimes

    that only means specifying the scope of crimes


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-16 07:29:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1791007954432319694

    Reply addressees: @BobbyBrisket

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1791002159133155680

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @AutistocratMS @radiofreenw Opportunity is not a demonstrated

    RT @curtdoolittle: @AutistocratMS @radiofreenw Opportunity is not a demonstrated interest. It is a commons produced by the concentration of…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-16 06:06:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790987227792560132