An Appeal Against Sentimental Populist Libertarianism http://www.capitalismv3.com/?p=3301
Source date (UTC): 2011-07-20 12:55:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/93665262984892417
An Appeal Against Sentimental Populist Libertarianism http://www.capitalismv3.com/?p=3301
Source date (UTC): 2011-07-20 12:55:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/93665262984892417
Quoting Steve Horowitz Quoting Hayek: Libertarianism’s assertion that we are but risen apes. http://www.capitalismv3.com/?p=3348
Source date (UTC): 2011-07-20 12:47:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/93663441906188288
‘…a sovereign and contiguous state’. A state will allow collection of taxes, the creation of armed forces.
Source date (UTC): 2011-05-22 16:23:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/72336836390944768
Reply addressees: @ristro @BreakingNews
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/72323401129275392
IN REPLY TO:
@ristro
RT @BreakingNews: Obama: Palestinians must have right to govern themselves in a ‘sovereign and contiguous state’
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/72323401129275392
What about exporting technology (how-to) rather than products?
Source date (UTC): 2011-05-18 15:57:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/70880758461513730
Reply addressees: @LibertarianMike
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/70875721186295808
IN REPLY TO:
@LibertarianMike
Nothing is more absurd than this doctrine of the balance of trade.” — Adam Smith, 1776 #quote
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/70875721186295808
My ironic sense of humor does not come across on Twitter. 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2011-05-18 15:32:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/70874332846505985
Only wanna-be nouveau’s lease Lamborghini’s. Players pay cash. Besides, car lovers drive Ferraris: better visibility and feel.
Source date (UTC): 2011-05-18 14:48:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/70863223984881664
Reply addressees: @GuyKawasaki
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/70843721482117121
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/70843721482117121
My experience is in the field is that people buy ideas, they don’t buy the effort to create them. Show up with answers. 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2011-05-18 14:42:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/70861907195740160
Reply addressees: @eolsencreative
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/70858593330671616
IN REPLY TO:
@ericolsenCMO
@curt_doolittle Perhaps. But, people might also think I’d be more likely to MAKE them money.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/70858593330671616
People will be less wiling to give you money. Fashion is a proletariat industry, and symbol. Money encourages conformity.
Source date (UTC): 2011-05-18 14:25:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/70857539046215680
Reply addressees: @eolsencreative
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/70853679867117568
IN REPLY TO:
@ericolsenCMO
I’m contemplating dressing weird just to convince people how creative I am.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/70853679867117568
The first problem with laws is that they do not die with the fools who wrote them.
Source date (UTC): 2010-03-20 00:28:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/10748682890
Gaddaffi is indeed a sad spectacle. But in the west we separate words and deeds. This isn’t a universal perception. And it works for him.
Source date (UTC): 2009-09-27 13:23:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/4416521984