Source: Twitter X

  • RT @Will_of_Europa: Accounts that you should be following to become a 1%’er The

    RT @Will_of_Europa: Accounts that you should be following to become a 1%’er

    The only war crime is losing; monetize, don’t moralize @Psyche…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-20 21:17:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1792665952284533189

  • I’m aware of that. πŸ˜‰ What I would like is for us to transform that worldview fo

    I’m aware of that. πŸ˜‰ What I would like is for us to transform that worldview for more people even if it means simply teaching them directly, or enacting laws that educate them ‘with persuasive power’. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-20 18:05:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1792617672124911858

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @TheoAdoreDore @romanyam

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1792616114608025970

  • BTW: I say ‘rarely and very rarely’, not ‘never’. To do so would be illogical. ;

    BTW: I say ‘rarely and very rarely’, not ‘never’. To do so would be illogical. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-20 17:52:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1792614351402135668

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @TheoAdoreDore @romanyam

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1792611162774974667

  • Of course you will. It doesn’t mean I won’t enjoy the process. πŸ˜‰ -hugs

    Of course you will. It doesn’t mean I won’t enjoy the process. πŸ˜‰ -hugs


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-20 17:51:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1792614163040059498

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @TheoAdoreDore @romanyam

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1792611162774974667

  • (nerding out for a moment) DO NEURONS ACT LIKE PEOPLE OR DO PEOPLE ACT LIKE NEUR

    (nerding out for a moment)
    DO NEURONS ACT LIKE PEOPLE OR DO PEOPLE ACT LIKE NEURONS? πŸ˜‰

    You know, we’re writing the chapter on embodiment, and presently explaining dendritic computation, and then how associative neurons work together to produce useful information for the body (and mind).

    I try to remind people that evolution not only ‘finds a way’ but ‘finds every way possible’ to assist in information transfer within and across cells.

    And it’s one thing to understand this complexity, and another to render it comprehensible for a college level audience of readers.

    And in rendering it comprehensible I’m repeatedly filled with wonder. Because a neuron is just a specialization of an ordinary cell that can transmit information both long distances (nerves are neuron’s axons), and identify patterns in time and space (a neuron’s dendrites), and cooperate with other neurons (axons and dendrites) in a network and hierarchy to identify larger and larger patterns in time and space until they produce a representation of the internal body state , the body, and the outer world, and using that information and memory of previous representations (episodic memories) predict future possibilities risks and opportunities.

    So it’s tempting to think of a neuron as a capacitor, but realistically they are analogous to little humans … which shouldn’t be surprising since humans are largely a collection of neurons that manipulate a body to produce the resources to fed the organs that enable the neurons and the body.

    So there is something very beautiful and wondrous about that understanding – and looking at neurons as cooperating like people in families in societies, and in countries … well, it’s an easy way to explain what they’re doing way down there in extraordinary numbers. πŸ˜‰

    Cheers.
    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-20 17:50:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1792613977056309248

  • (As usual, Martin is painfully logical. … except when he disagrees with me πŸ˜‰

    (As usual, Martin is painfully logical. … except when he disagrees with me πŸ˜‰ But then I try to provoke those disagreements now and then just for fun. πŸ˜‰ )


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-20 17:36:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1792610443162431591

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @TheoAdoreDore @romanyam

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1792609234946867423

  • (well done)

    (well done)


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-20 17:32:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1792609392237679063

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @TheoAdoreDore @romanyam

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1792609234946867423

  • CHRISTIANITY, EUROPEAN RELIGIONS, AND THE COUNTER ARGUMENT AGAINST OTHER RELIGIO

    CHRISTIANITY, EUROPEAN RELIGIONS, AND THE COUNTER ARGUMENT AGAINST OTHER RELIGIONS
    The Christians, in an effort to produce cooperation, and suppress tribalism first, and clannishness second, succeeded in producing the nation-state, but those nations states were all within Christendom.

    There is a reason religions reflect civilizations and civilizations reflect races – because race and civilization and planetary geography, are the maximum demographic and cultural and political organizations that can follow the same group strategy.

    As such religions are always and will always consist of group strategies for states, federations, and civilizations that are relatively racially, civilizationally, culturally, and institutionally marginally indifferent.

    And, even if say, christianity is the optimum religion of transition into a middle class majority polity, (just as buddhism and hinduism are a race to stagnation, and islam is a race to devolution to the bottom), that doesn’t mean that it won’t preserve the group evolutionary strategy of the people, because all it does is foster tolerance, forgiveness, trust, and mindfulness despite human instinct and intuitions.

    Conversely there are no other religions, at least other than our native religions, even the new secular leftist religions, that are not contrary and hostile to our group evolutionary strategy.

    For this reason tolerance for other religions in the home is one thing, but presence of these religions in the commons is nothing more than warfare against our commons.

    As such, while we do not want the self interest of the state to interfere in our European religious spectrum, that does not mean that we need tolerate, permit, and not outlaw those religions that are hostile to our civilizations.

    Affections
    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-20 17:10:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1792603750705643522

  • The Christians, in an effort to produce cooperation, and suppress tribalism firs

    The Christians, in an effort to produce cooperation, and suppress tribalism first, and clannishness second, succeeded in producing the nation-state, but those nations states were all within Christendom.

    There is a reason religions reflect civilizations and civilizations reflect races – because race and civilization and planetary geography, are the maximum demographic and cultural and political organizations that can follow the same group strategy.

    As such religions are always and will always consist of group strategies for states, federations, and civilizations that are relatively racially, civilizationally, culturally, and institutionally marginally indifferent.

    And, even if say, christianity is the optimum religion of transition into a middle class majority polity, (just as buddhism and hinduism are a race to stagnation, and islam is a race to devolution to the bottom), that doesn’t mean that it won’t preserve the group evolutionary strategy of the people, because all it does is foster tolerance, forgiveness, trust, and mindfulness despite human instinct and intuitions.

    Conversely there are no other religions, at least other than our native religions, even the new secular leftist religions, that are not contrary and hostile to our group evolutionary strategy.

    For this reason tolerance for other religions in the home is one thing, but presence of these religions in the commons is nothing more than warfare against our commons.

    As such, while we do not want the self interest of the state to interfere in our European religious spectrum, that does not mean that we need tolerate, permit, and not outlaw those religions that are hostile to our civilizations.

    Affections
    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-20 17:10:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1792602138247372800

  • (well done.)

    (well done.)


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-20 16:49:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1792598436136513652

    Reply addressees: @WalterIII

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1792598267265692093