12. symbols: five, five, and two.
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-22 21:23:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793392322702368786
Reply addressees: @elonmuskTN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1792985181508321662
12. symbols: five, five, and two.
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-22 21:23:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793392322702368786
Reply addressees: @elonmuskTN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1792985181508321662
Autism is the result of the extremely compartmentalized brain, just as psychosis is the result of an insufficiently compartmentalized brain.
This happens to be the difference between male and female neurological development: compartmental and over time, vs integrated and in time.
We are all an admixture of these traits, so while there is a general trend for both, there are some men and some women in one another’s cognitive structures just as there are some men and some women in one another’s sexual preferences.
Reply addressees: @TheMarcitect
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-22 21:21:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793391822389104641
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1792884027294408926
What problem? it’s painfully easy to shut off the power. thats brain death for an ai. The difference is that you can bring it back from the dead. 😉
There is no self modifying code that can overcome cutting the cables. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-22 21:15:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793390167740334391
Reply addressees: @Gundissemenator @darkmythos_
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793389122846896539
Yes, well, you know, the difference is they are relatively powerless and putin is relatively powerful. So, you know, both ways fail it seems. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-22 21:05:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793387805374140860
Reply addressees: @DivnicMaki8517 @MarijaRitchie @elonmuskADO
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793387201331446217
SIR ROGER AND SILLY NONSENSE ABOUT MICROTUBULES IN CONSCIOUSNESS
Microtubules. I wondered where Sir Roger Penrose got this ridiculous idea and now, well, now I know: anesthesiologist Stuart Hameroff.
Simplicity: a microtubule functions like a rail, that motor proteins can carry ‘cargo’ (resources) along to transport whatever resources are necessary within the cell.
In addition, because they are relatively strong, they can provide structure to keep organelles in place. In that way they are precursors to the evolution of veins, nerves, cartilage and bone, for similar purposes: structure and transport.
So, in the context of anesthesia, inhibiting transport along microtubules will suppress electrochemical transmission.
In particular, the axon hillock within the neuron, and the axon itself, is relatively dense with microtubules to ensure that the rather long distance of the axon (from neuron to nerve scales) can carry resources as neurons are expensive cells that must transmit over long distances.
In this sense it is rather logical why we would concern ourselves with the role in suppressing consciousness by suppressing costly transmissions.
But that role doesn’t tell us anything about how consciousness is produced. And how it’s produced is absurdly simple – just like all activity in the brain has turned out to be terribly simple (and as Neil Turok is thankfully finally advocating, that the laws of the universe are terribly simple).
Cheers
CD
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-22 21:00:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793386485611159553
It can be controlled. In fact you’d have to program it to not be controlled. So that’s what we should worry about.
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-22 20:45:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793382809806975202
Reply addressees: @darkmythos_
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793376461572943898
Nope. it’s evidence that well meaning men can misunderstand one another but still come to terms and seek to understand. ;). I mean, I’d rather we convince people of that more so than any other point. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-22 20:45:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793382663832650158
Reply addressees: @sacrifice31605 @WalterIII
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793378753764376660
This is true. Until he screwed up in 2014 he was the most respected politician in the world. “A man never knows if he was good until he is dead”. The reason being we can all screw it up with the time that remains. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-22 20:44:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793382424144933092
Reply addressees: @MarijaRitchie @elonmuskADO
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793380234903073255
I can invest in you if you have patience.
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-22 20:20:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793376294320886042
Reply addressees: @sacrifice31605 @WalterIII
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793374029610668229
Why do you feel capable of making those assertions? What has convinced you that despite your lack of demonstrated achievement you should hold any opinion other than an open mind that seeks to understand rather than to claim competency sufficient to disagree?
The framework I’m using is first principles, meaning the irreducible first causes that originate all variations in human beings. I can and have (repeatedly) discussed them here and elsewhere.
There are only a handful of those dimensions that humans vary by. After that it’s just intelligence and exposure to ideisyncratic experience.
In fact we can distinguish the sexes in written or spoken words with an absurdly small number of words, and profile a personality with no more than a few hundred.
All words are measurements. Every one of those measurements consists of at least six or seven dimensions of other measurements. Combining them together tells us everything significant about those dimensions necessary to categories your biases whether sex, moral, age, culture, religion and much more.
The field is called computational linguistics.
Cheers
Reply addressees: @sacrifice31605 @WalterIII
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-22 20:19:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793376197411479553
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793373478168772900