While you don’t advertise it, the truth is, you’re better at living life to the fullest than anyone I know. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-10 20:08:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1987975730169606535
While you don’t advertise it, the truth is, you’re better at living life to the fullest than anyone I know. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-10 20:08:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1987975730169606535
(Diary)
There is a table of six or eight fully ‘integrated’ Indian (Hindustani) women in the restaurant this morning, all in their thirties, all of whom are between attractive and beautiful.
So, of course, I had to ask them if there wasn’t some law that limited the number of beautiful women in one place at a time. “It just seems like too much temptation for mortal man.” 🙂
Lots of smiles, giggles, thanks, and appreciation of course.
It’s always worth finding something nice to randomly say to neighbors. It’s like contributing to the happiness charity of the commons. 😉
Some of my friends find it between forward and offensive, but that’s just because they’re not as gregarious and prosocial in these matters. I”m willing to have the occasional slip in exchange for all the positive interactions.
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-09 19:14:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1987599773487210829
THE FOLLY OF YOUNG PEOPLE’S WANT OF SOCIALISM
Curt Doolittle argues that true socialism—where the government controls production—sounds appealing but is impossible to achieve.He says that if people really mean “social democracy” like in Europe (which focuses on heavy wealth redistribution rather than owning businesses), it only works under specific conditions:
– The population must keep growing through high birth rates.
– The people’s skills and makeup must align with what the modern economy needs to support that growth.
That’s why Europe will have to cut back on these policies, and the US can’t sustain them either—especially for things like retirement and healthcare in the coming years.
He criticizes young people pushing for socialism as ignorant “nitwittery.”
Instead of that, he favors Trump-style reforms:
– Overhaul global strategies to lower costs.
– Strengthen the economy to create more jobs and increase self-sufficiency (autarky).
– Reduce the burden of immigration by only allowing people who meet demographic standards for competitiveness and viability.
– These young advocates are essentially self-destructive, he claims, because they’re assuming the US and Europe can cling to or revive their post-World War II advantages in strategy, demographics, institutions, science, technology, and economics.
But those edges were temporary “windfalls” from historical revolutions (like the Enlightenment and Industrial Revolution), which have now spread worldwide and can’t be recaptured.
In short, pushing for more socialism is like “barking up a dying tree”—it’s a failing, outdated idea.
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-09 19:01:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1987596462293926309
Socialism sounds good. It can’t happen. Sorry. If you mean social democracy (Europe) which doesn’t mean centralization of production, but aggressive redistribution even if only indrectly, then it only works as long as (a) your rate of reproduction is increasing the population over time, (b) your demographic distribution remains parallel to the scientific and technological demands of the economy necessary to support that reproduction and growth. Hence why europe must cease their redistributive policies, and why the USA cannot maintain it’s redistributive policies, particularly in retirement and healthcare in the coming decades.
So my assessment is that the young ignorant nitwittery that’s harping on socialism instead of Trumpian aggressive restructuring of geostrategy to reduce our costs, the economy to increase our employability and autarky, and decrease our costs of supporting immigration that does’t pass the demographic threshold of competitive viability is trying to commit suicide under the presumption that the pre-and postwar worlds of american and european strategic, demographic, institutional, scientific, technological, and economic advantage are either possible to continue or possible to restore – when those circumstances were windfalls of the enlightenment, scientific, industrial, and technological revolutions that have been dissipated out into the world.
You’re barking up a dying tree.
Curt Doolittle.
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-09 18:43:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1987591814363430987
Buying Twitter.
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-09 18:02:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1987581620686303559
It’s not impossible. It’s expensive.
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-09 18:02:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1987581519880401235
(NLI HUMOR)
I asked our Runcible Certification engine why Dr Brad is such a “Dick” and it didn’t argue my conclusion, only how I should interpret his behavior correctly. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-09 15:10:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1987538209715388906
Its actually hard to stop it from blowing smoke. I can with chatgpt. This is from grok.
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-09 07:29:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1987422240351396227
It doesn’t exist as money. It only exists as the capacity to influence other humans to continue to advance science and technology toward musk’s goal to make us independent of earth. and in doing so create incredible jobs with the consequences including spillover science technology, and economic rewards.
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-09 07:11:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1987417819290751165
Yes it does unless one’s being pedantic: A statement of precision beyond which the analogy is meant to inform.
Yes, the only rules governing the operation of the universe produce the equivalent of computation by trial and error within those rules. Computation need not be declarative and with intent, it can, conduct experimentation by trial and error.
Why? Because like computation, there are only so many operations available at every scale of complexity.
As such we do see as (+) Accumulation (supply), (-) Accumulation (demand), (=) Stabilization(Persistence), and (!=) Dissipation to Collapse.
Giving us states and operations (those combinations that persist). Which results in computation.
If you mean is there a program? Of course. Was it composed? No. Did it evolve? Yes, but by the same rule: survival.
The laws of the universe are those that could survive. We just haven’t quite understood what’s happening down there in the quantum background prior to the formation of proto particles and particles.
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-09 07:09:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1987417159727984657