Um. Yes, the institutes phone number works…. You don’t have to call and test it. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-15 22:35:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1085304432059969536
Um. Yes, the institutes phone number works…. You don’t have to call and test it. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-15 22:35:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1085304432059969536
I wish I did. But as someone who has an education in the fine arts, and has built a marketing business, neither of those fields is friendly territory… lol
Very hard to argue with tech if you can do the work.
every era values some new form of calculation and it’s still ours.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-15 21:05:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1085281830042038272
Reply addressees: @SageNAllFields
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1085233186584518657
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1085233186584518657
( Love you all. 😉 )
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-15 03:13:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1085011993277411329
Gods need no gods.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-14 17:32:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1084865844742684672
Thank you John Mark, for all you are doing for us.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-14 12:20:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1084787329812873217
Knowing the deflation, operationalism, and grammars is a bit like having a superpower. And I just realized that if we teach everyone Testimonialism I won’t be the only person with the superpower…. sigh… 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-13 22:36:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1084580018037116931
Copyright strike b/c of intro music. Repost soon.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-13 21:59:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1084570773250076672
Reply addressees: @QuestionMThings @EmperorInvictus
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1084549066493751296
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1084549066493751296
No idea. Waiting for an answer myself. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-13 20:41:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1084550917360365568
Reply addressees: @QuestionMThings @EmperorInvictus
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1084549066493751296
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1084549066493751296
True to principles = nonsense statement. Absolutism = nonsense statement. relativism nonsense statement. I work work operationally, logically, and empirically. Rothbard was a common property marxist just as marx was private property marxist. They Both Hate The Superior Classes.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-13 16:19:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1084484981114703882
Reply addressees: @rohansharan @MurraySuggests @TrueDilTom
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1084456845891186688
IN REPLY TO:
@rohansharan
@MurraySuggests @curtdoolittle Rothbard was true to his principles building it on absolutism, not relativism. Your criticism of him like in your recent fb posts is unwarranted. @TrueDilTom
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1084456845891186688
I don’t make mistakes. Once I understood the method of argument under which abrahamic law and theology, the platonisms, fictionalisms, and Marxism, Neoconservatism, Libertarianism, Postmodernism, and Feminism were constructed his feminine frauds became obvious.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-13 16:17:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1084484505463910400
Reply addressees: @rohansharan @MurraySuggests @TrueDilTom
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1084456845891186688
IN REPLY TO:
@rohansharan
@MurraySuggests @curtdoolittle Rothbard was true to his principles building it on absolutism, not relativism. Your criticism of him like in your recent fb posts is unwarranted. @TrueDilTom
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1084456845891186688