Source: Twitter X

  • WHY AM I AN ANTI-PHILOSOPHY ‘PHILOSOPHER”? One would only read continental philo

    WHY AM I AN ANTI-PHILOSOPHY ‘PHILOSOPHER”?
    One would only read continental philosophy if one was not competent to read contemporary algorithmic logic, genetics, cognitive science, behavioral economics. Philosophy as a paradigm, as knowledge, and truth rather than just choice (preference) was exhausted before the 20th, and has gone the way of theology as a footnote in the history of thought.

    If you invest in the frame provided by the French (Rousseau, Voltaire et al), Germans (Kant et all), or the Ashkenazi (Freud, boas, Marx, et al) then you create an impediment to knowledge, not knowledge.

    Every single one of those thinkers was trying to deny anglo empiricism and legalism, and to create a secular theology to replace the church – because most if not all people who are indoctrinated into the Abrahamic faiths are left vulnerable to lack of sufficient confidence and resulting mindfulness to bear the continuous struggle of continuous learning, reorganization, and adaptation that adversarial empiricism demands.

    Or said differently, continental philosophy serves as a pseudoscientific range from Russian, to German, to french, to Ashkenazi that seeks to avoid the responsibility of the restoration of Aristotelianism and classical thought.

    The weak west is addicted to the false promise of false explanations because we lack a narrative or mythos that provides mindfulness in the face of continuous adaptation to the discovery of, application of, and consequences of our increasing correspondence with the laws of the universe.

    This is why we require military training to compensate for Christian doctrine. And is why the Greeks invented tragedy so that we could tolerate it. And why Jesus of Nazareth discovered and taught the only means of getting over that tragedy for the bottom: the extension of kinship love to all in the polity.

    But the Paulians abused that message by wrapping it in false promise of freedom from those laws, rather than the use of love and compassion to tolerate them.

    In other words, preservation of continental philosophy is evation of responsibility for science adaptation and evolution, and yet another exercise in justifying western man’s Christian addiction to submission and cowardice as a pretense of conviction rather than a convenience of not taking responsibility for dragging one’s self, and one’s people out of superstition, ignorance, dysgenia, and decline.

    So the people who are weak seek pseudoscience and sophistry as sedation against the stress of the recognition of their unfitness to survive because they cannot or will not evolve along with the state of human knowledge in our long journey from beast, to man, to godhood ourselves.

    The reason the white disenfranchised are alienated, conquered, and defeated is their Christian cowardice masquerading as false pride and conviction – but nothing more than addicts to a frame of lies, and spending down a civilization built by better men.

    As far as I know philosophy is over and only the formal physical behavioral and evolutionary sciences remain.

    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-08 01:34:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810125322198691840

  • THE SCIENTIFIC CASE FOR CHRISTIANITY There is a case for what we call religion (

    THE SCIENTIFIC CASE FOR CHRISTIANITY
    There is a case for what we call religion (institutions of the production of mindfulness by training moral intuition). There is a better case for a ‘post-supernatural’ religion closer to stoicism, which does achieve mindfulness but without the drawbacks of superstition and supernaturalism.

    So historically, christianity has been optimum. Christianity is optimum only because it has been Germanized over the centuries, and instead of a semitic religious monopoly, christianity serves one point of the triangle of European trifunctionalism – meaning competition between elites and institutions of the military-state, cooperation-trade, and social-faith.
    So the good in christianity is the odd combination of primitive semitic underclass myths, the long history of European philosophy, and the longer history of European traditional law of individual sovereignty. Europeans made Christianity compatible with aristocratic civilization despite it’s origin as a priestly slave religion in the middle east. And moreover, judaism, christianity, and then islam were revolts against indo European (European and Persian) military, political, economic, and cultural superiority.
    In this sense, Christianity (was) the optimum existing religious system (set of moral intuitions) for the same reason European civilization out-innovated, out-governed, out-produced, and out-evolved all other civilizations in such a very short historical time frame, despite being a small population on the edge of the bronze age.
    Why? Christianity made it possible for women, the underclass, and slaves to integrate into aristocratic European civilization’s demand for individual heroism as a responsibility by simply doing no wrong, and if possible doing some goods, despite not having strength, skill, education, family and clan productive assets, wealth, or political or military achievements.
    Christianity has a very simple rule embodied in the character of Jesus: the elimination of hatred from the human heart, the extension of kinship love to all, forgiveness of petty human frailties until impossibly unrepentant, and a demand for personal acts of charity at personal cost – in exchange for the mindfulness of knowing you’re doing the right thing at all times; that negativity from others is to be forgiven, and that hardship is the cost of this mindfulness, and that ‘offering up’ those costs, and having confidence that ‘god’ loves you, does in fact produce a society in which produces the optimum human behavior whether nor not god exists.

    Cheers
    CD

    Reply addressees: @megs_io


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-07 22:16:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810075526016700416

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1809742334428393797

  • RT @LukeWeinhagen: One example of separating the insurers (cost payers) from the

    RT @LukeWeinhagen: One example of separating the insurers (cost payers) from the deciders (cost creators).


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-07 21:55:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810070222436520337

  • RT @LukeWeinhagen: Any ideology that makes moral the passing of the costs of dec

    RT @LukeWeinhagen: Any ideology that makes moral the passing of the costs of decisions (feminism, communism, etc…) onto anyone other than t…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-07 21:55:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810070172608139492

  • THEY LOVE HATING WHITE PEOPLE? —“Replacing “jews” with “whites” causes liberals

    THEY LOVE HATING WHITE PEOPLE?
    —“Replacing “jews” with “whites” causes liberals to agree with various (non genocidal) antisemitic statements of Hitler.”— Bernstein and Bleske-Rechek (2023)

    Bernstein and Bleske-Rechek (2023) conducted a study examining how agreement with prejudicial statements varies depending on the target group and political affiliation. The researchers took quotes from Adolf Hitler (anti-Jew), Robin DiAngelo (anti-White), and Stephen Douglas (anti-Black), and created variations by replacing the target group in each quote.The study found that for 7 out of 9 quotes, agreement was highest when the statements were framed as anti-White, compared to anti-Jew or anti-Black versions. This pattern held true across political ideologies, with liberals showing the highest levels of agreement with anti-White statements.Specifically regarding Hitler’s quotes, the results showed that agreement was much higher when the original anti-Jew statements were modified to be anti-White. This finding supports the claim that replacing “Jews” with “Whites” in Hitler’s statements led to increased agreement, particularly among liberals.

    Source:
    https://t.co/3oVpxX0HSM


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-07 21:54:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810069997231935488

  • RT @LukeWeinhagen: I see a slightly different frame on this, though the end resu

    RT @LukeWeinhagen: I see a slightly different frame on this, though the end result is the same.

    Feminism has destroyed eight hundred years…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-07 21:43:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810067022220304522

  • She’s saying these things because she became famous by viral means, out of nowhe

    She’s saying these things because she became famous by viral means, out of nowhere, and it’s good for her business and career to run with it.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-07 21:42:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810066899843367122

    Reply addressees: @Hail__To_You

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810052386234232980

  • OMG. Just take her at face value. She’s a wealthy, highly educated therapist to

    OMG. Just take her at face value. She’s a wealthy, highly educated therapist to the rich of Dubai.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-07 21:41:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810066574142816441

    Reply addressees: @Hail__To_You

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810052386234232980

  • LW: Balance: usually: Non Meritocratic Equality(F) vs Meritocratic Proportionali

    LW: Balance: usually: Non Meritocratic Equality(F) vs Meritocratic Proportionality (M). Is there a better term than balance?


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-07 19:47:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810038040380780984

    Reply addressees: @LukeWeinhagen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810034252563505273

  • RT @LukeWeinhagen: @curtdoolittle Compatibility in supply and demand

    RT @LukeWeinhagen: @curtdoolittle Compatibility in supply and demand –


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-07 19:45:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810037536598987104