
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-09 02:20:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810499151219823057

Source date (UTC): 2024-07-09 02:20:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810499151219823057
A federation maybe, but it’s certainly working. It’s deterministic rather than intentional. But we are moving toward a concurrency of thought on the right that will make possible our mutually desired ends.
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-09 01:59:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810494059883946300
Reply addressees: @Lord__Sousa @realstewpeters @whatifalthist @NoahRevoy @ThruTheHayes
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810451460041101637
what is the difference between analytic philosophy and scientific theorizing? The difference is the existence of the references and the operational possibilties upon them.
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-08 19:12:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810391524448022624
Reply addressees: @partymember55
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810390823051374935
Again, Trump is as sophisticated at ‘negotiation and debate’ as the postmoderns and the left are. He is just reflecting the same strategy using conservative hyperbole rather than progressive sophistry.
The fact that so many of you do not grasp this astounds me. He wrote it all in the art of the deal. So I see him just doing the same as the left, but using the conservative method of thinking (‘what if everyone did this’) instead of the progressive thinking (‘what exceptions occur if we do this’).
Reply addressees: @eyeslasho
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-08 19:11:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810391269451116544
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810325942218248546
Russell
Yes, and so LLMs will evolve into 1) specialized agents (already happening) 2) increasing association between increasingly abstract concepts, 3) competing predictions 4) wayfinding between predictions, 5) auditing predictions for possibility of acting upon them.
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-08 19:07:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810390280912384459
Reply addressees: @RussellJohnston @RolandBasilides
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810388770660720703
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
The reason we require reason so to speak exists because our auto-associative memory (intuition) proposes too uncertain or too many competing (undecidable) possibilities to choose from. Reason then acts as a wayfinding process (navigation, maze-solving) in order to get to some one of those possibilities. And this process iteratively continues until some possibility is chosen as possible. 😉
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1810388770660720703
Another enjoyable interview with @realstewpeters today. I hope he keeps gaining momentum because he’s the real deal.
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-08 19:04:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810389452763857154
Well, I would need some reason to presume some external causality other than those we observe that wasn’t instead evidence of one of the many human cognitive biases that originate in anthropomorphism.
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-08 19:02:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810389113784381505
Reply addressees: @RolandBasilides
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810373259537559905
RT @curtdoolittle: @RussellJohnston @RolandBasilides The reason we require reason so to speak exists because our auto-associative memory (i…
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-08 19:01:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810388791817073120
The reason we require reason so to speak exists because our auto-associative memory (intuition) proposes too uncertain or too many competing (undecidable) possibilities to choose from. Reason then acts as a wayfinding process (navigation, maze-solving) in order to get to some…
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-08 19:01:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810388770660720703
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810387777986478355
This is my understanding, yes.
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-08 18:58:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810388112180392113
Reply addressees: @partymember55
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810385553570910588