CURIOUS
Has your interest in P ever effected one of your relationships, and if so how?
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-08 21:54:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1137478088114106368
Source: Twitter X
-
CURIOUS Has your interest in P ever effected one of your relationships, and if s
-
I mean, 100m is a statistic, right?
I mean, 100m is a statistic, right?
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-08 21:52:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1137477419185500160
-
That makes absolutely no sense at all – or maybe it does to you. Because Democri
That makes absolutely no sense at all – or maybe it does to you. Because Democritus and Aristotle precede Christianity by a long shot, and european law originates with the Yamna expansion with heroism, meritocracy, sovereignty, reciprocity, and the law: Law of Raider and Pirates.
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-08 21:41:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1137474863914999813
Reply addressees: @PRO__UNLIMITED
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1137461248847536128
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1137461248847536128
-
“Equality only exists in the minds of the programmed herd, and the fairytales of
—“Equality only exists in the minds of the programmed herd, and the fairytales of children. … Nature defines equality, and her answer is a resounding “No”.”—JG Garner
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-08 21:37:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1137473835291144192
-
“Egalitarianism is the secular repackaging of Abrahamic universalism — the cree
—“Egalitarianism is the secular repackaging of Abrahamic universalism — the creed that denies speciation and asserts that we are all children of the same deity.”— Ormazd Rocky
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-08 20:43:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1137460136639754240
-
“Equality is the great lie taught to children.”—Corey Harms
—“Equality is the great lie taught to children.”—Corey Harms
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-08 20:01:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1137449669133365248
-
THE CHOICE OF THE CONSEQUENCE OF LAW —“The way I think of it, we have a choice
THE CHOICE OF THE CONSEQUENCE OF LAW
—“The way I think of it, we have a choice to enforce the law in a controlled manner or it will enforce itself with much collateral damage. But it is the law, there’s no long-term escaping it.”—Martin Štěpán
(perfect)
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-08 18:24:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1137425260658081793
-
#NewRight Is Everywhere
#NewRight Is Everywhere
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-08 11:27:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1137320175534051328
-
The absolute claim is the implied claim that that closure, proof of truth (justi
The absolute claim is the implied claim that that closure, proof of truth (justification) exist. Same with problem of induction. We can use logic to falsify (test consistency) but we can’t use it to ‘prove’ which is why we never did succeed with it, and why science did.
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-08 10:05:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1137299716499214336
Reply addressees: @Prussian_Reborn
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1137123681640026113
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1137123681640026113
-
None of these are closed (closure)
None of these are closed (closure).
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-07 23:09:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1137134449760583681
Reply addressees: @Prussian_Reborn
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1137134051448504321
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Prussian_Reborn Proofs tell us only of internal consistency,not whether a claim is true other than a claim of internal consistency. In math we claim only proof not truth. In logic only inference from given contingent premises. In empiricism only correspondence. In Construction only possibility.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1137134051448504321
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Prussian_Reborn Proofs tell us only of internal consistency,not whether a claim is true other than a claim of internal consistency. In math we claim only proof not truth. In logic only inference from given contingent premises. In empiricism only correspondence. In Construction only possibility.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1137134051448504321