Source: Twitter X

  • Deceptions: Involuntary Compliance by Extractive Signaling By @LukeWeinhagen, Sr

    Deceptions: Involuntary Compliance by Extractive Signaling

    By , Sr Fellow, The Natural Law Institute Innovation Signaling is no different from any other form of extractive signaling. It’s an attempt to capture the benefits of inclusion in a category without meeting the burden of meeting the standards for inclusion in the category. Signaling vs Demonstrating
    We keep trying to push back against a signal and it doesn’t work to stop the spread of degradation and degeneracy, because the signal is a trick.
    • Virtue Signal vs Demonstrated Virtue
    • Competence Signal vs Demonstrated Competence
    • Investment Signal vs Demonstrated Investment
    • Ownership Signaling vs Demonstrated Ownership
    • Power Signal vs Demonstrated Power
    All of these tricks depend on, and literally can not exist without, leveraging the demonstrated behavior of the signal’s recipient for the benefit of the signaler. The signal does not produce the effect. Instead, the signal triggers the demonstrator’s compliance to produce the effect.
    Put another way – the signals are only effective to the degree the signaled population complies with the signal.
    We’re conflating compliance with cooperation.
    Because the institutions of the West are institutions of cooperation, our conflation of compliance as cooperation in the West provides all of these signals their strength.
    Not recognizing the distinction between compliance and cooperation makes the choke point strategy effective.
    Because “Plan. Organize. Fight. Win.” are all expressions of cooperation in the conflict of culture, and we believe we are already cooperating (when instead we’re complying), these coordinated actions will suffer until we can clearly recognize compliance and cooperation.
    Category Theft & Linguistic Parasitism via Extractive Signaling Detach the label used to identify a category then abuse the common understanding and/or misunderstanding of the label to strip-mine any benefit of inclusion with the category without the burden of meeting the standards or measures that define the category.
    Clarifying cooperation is essential to disrupting signal compliance. We do the science of cooperation at the
    -Luke Weinhagen

    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-15 00:50:37 UTC

    Original post: https://x.com/i/articles/1812650944523637008

  • By @LukeWeinhagen, Sr Fellow, The Natural Law Institute Innovation Signaling is

    By @LukeWeinhagen, Sr Fellow, The Natural Law Institute

    Innovation Signaling is no different from any other form of extractive signaling. It’s an attempt to capture the benefits of inclusion in a category without meeting the burden of meeting the standards for inclusion in the category.

    Signaling vs Demonstrating

    We keep trying to push back against a signal and it doesn’t work to stop the spread of degradation and degeneracy, because the signal is a trick.

    Virtue Signal vs Demonstrated Virtue

    Competence Signal vs Demonstrated Competence

    Investment Signal vs Demonstrated Investment

    Ownership Signaling vs Demonstrated Ownership

    Power Signal vs Demonstrated Power

    All of these tricks depend on, and literally can not exist without, leveraging the demonstrated behavior of the signal’s recipient for the benefit of the signaler. The signal does not produce the effect. Instead, the signal triggers the demonstrator’s compliance to produce the effect.

    Put another way – the signals are only effective to the degree the signaled population complies with the signal.

    We’re conflating compliance with cooperation.

    Because the institutions of the West are institutions of cooperation, our conflation of compliance as cooperation in the West provides all of these signals their strength.

    Not recognizing the distinction between compliance and cooperation makes the choke point strategy effective.

    Because “Plan. Organize. Fight. Win.” are all expressions of cooperation in the conflict of culture, and we believe we are already cooperating (when instead we’re complying), these coordinated actions will suffer until we can clearly recognize compliance and cooperation.

    Category Theft & Linguistic Parasitism via Extractive Signaling
    Detach the label used to identify a category then abuse the common understanding and/or misunderstanding of the label to strip-mine any benefit of inclusion with the category without the burden of meeting the standards or measures that define the category.

    Clarifying cooperation is essential to disrupting signal compliance. We do the science of cooperation at the @NatLawInstitute

    -Luke Weinhagen


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-15 00:44:01 UTC

    Original post: https://x.com/i/articles/1812649283239456768

  • OK. I’ll do it

    OK. I’ll do it.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-15 00:43:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812649175902789738

    Reply addressees: @LukeWeinhagen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812648776101691551

  • I’ll do the article thing if. you don’t. ‘Cause this is good. πŸ˜‰

    I’ll do the article thing if. you don’t. ‘Cause this is good. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-15 00:41:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812648593192284518

    Reply addressees: @LukeWeinhagen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812641089829917154

  • You know, you’ve a blue checkmark so you can combine these into an Article (Left

    You know, you’ve a blue checkmark so you can combine these into an Article (Left Menu, Articles).


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-15 00:40:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812648521712927211

    Reply addressees: @LukeWeinhagen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812641089829917154

  • RT @LukeWeinhagen: Bookmark Curt’s post – This represents essential understandin

    RT @LukeWeinhagen: Bookmark Curt’s post –

    This represents essential understanding for integrating a world of constant change.

    Being able…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-15 00:39:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812648211519070686

  • No. Thank you, and well done! πŸ˜‰

    No. Thank you, and well done! πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-15 00:39:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812648180594385074

    Reply addressees: @LukeWeinhagen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812646855182037384

  • Oh. BTW: we worked on this today, and it’s the criteria for a truth claim. It re

    Oh. BTW: we worked on this today, and it’s the criteria for a truth claim. It requires some contemplation.

    We’ll finish the rest of the definitions at the bottom in the next few days. But they are by and large self explanatory.

    https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1812644426142953908


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    McGilchrist has created a fictionalism (pseudoscience) to justify his christian fundamentalism.
    Instead, the origin of the two hemispheres is predator (left) prey (right) which should be obvious with less than ten seconds of thought.
    Nature cannot conceive, it can only solve incremental problems, and with bilateralism’s advantage in motion came the problem of synchronizing bilateralism, and solution to the bilateral brain produced the potential and demand for hemispheric dominance (priority) and as a consequence specialization. This resulted in the origin of all human differences sex, with the female (integrated and prey) bias, and the masculine (compartmentalized and predator) bias.
    You are welcome as is anyone else to watch my videos on the foundations on our YT channel to understand these matters.
    You are a good person, with moral ambitions, and you’re intellectually honest, so It’s worth my time to at least respond to you, but you should also try to recall that I’m probably one of only a handful of people on earth who understand these things at all levels of precision, and perhaps consider that just because I am kind in devoting my time to the public it does not mean it’s to be taken lightly. (Well, except when we’re all trash talking some nonsense or other as a break from the tedium and frustration of other bits of life. πŸ˜‰ )
    -hugs

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1812647695464772003

  • McGilchrist has created a fictionalism (pseudoscience) to justify his christian

    McGilchrist has created a fictionalism (pseudoscience) to justify his christian fundamentalism.
    Instead, the origin of the two hemispheres is predator (left) prey (right) which should be obvious with less than ten seconds of thought.
    Nature cannot conceive, it can only solve incremental problems, and with bilateralism’s advantage in motion came the problem of synchronizing bilateralism, and solution to the bilateral brain produced the potential and demand for hemispheric dominance (priority) and as a consequence specialization. This resulted in the origin of all human differences sex, with the female (integrated and prey) bias, and the masculine (compartmentalized and predator) bias.
    You are welcome as is anyone else to watch my videos on the foundations on our YT channel to understand these matters.
    You are a good person, with moral ambitions, and you’re intellectually honest, so It’s worth my time to at least respond to you, but you should also try to recall that I’m probably one of only a handful of people on earth who understand these things at all levels of precision, and perhaps consider that just because I am kind in devoting my time to the public it does not mean it’s to be taken lightly. (Well, except when we’re all trash talking some nonsense or other as a break from the tedium and frustration of other bits of life. πŸ˜‰ )
    -hugs

    Reply addressees: @artus9010


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-15 00:37:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812647695322136577

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812547586709926066

  • Why are you looking at employed rather than the demographic distribution. And wh

    Why are you looking at employed rather than the demographic distribution. And what occurs to demand as we add or remove distributions within it?


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-15 00:29:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812645548022722644

    Reply addressees: @slenchy @whatifalthist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812639263646769451