When People Are Presented with The Choice They Will Choose P-Law https://ift.tt/2MqGvBt
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-19 15:40:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163475932000280586
When People Are Presented with The Choice They Will Choose P-Law https://ift.tt/2MqGvBt
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-19 15:40:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163475932000280586
How did you come up with that bit of nonsense Johnny?
In other words, why should married, working, middle, and upper middle class people have only one or two children so that underclasses and single mothers can live off them? STOP BREEDING WHAT YOU CAN’T AFFORD.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-19 15:08:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163467712812785664
Reply addressees: @EnoughJonny @JohnMarkSays @JFGariepy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163449386300370944
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163449386300370944
HIPPOCAMPAL, ENTORINAL, AND CORTICAL DATA STRUCTURES
Well it’s… we have enough info now. The nobel was awarded for good reason. now we know how the brain matches all these fragments… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=451143732149189&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-19 14:43:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163461530647695360
So when John and I get to that point, of making a series of videos that explain our position vs yours. And present a constitution that is pure, and another than is tailored to the condition in the west, it is very hard for me to see that you and yours win a moral majority.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-19 13:22:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163441154823729152
Reply addressees: @SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163440329565069313
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux Meaning they were demonstrably inferior, and those who could compete were demonstrably superior, and that the central problem is one of self perceived status as inferior.
The solution is separation, separate political, economic and status systems.
Which is how we evolved.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163440329565069313
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux Meaning they were demonstrably inferior, and those who could compete were demonstrably superior, and that the central problem is one of self perceived status as inferior.
The solution is separation, separate political, economic and status systems.
Which is how we evolved.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163440329565069313
Meaning they were demonstrably inferior, and those who could compete were demonstrably superior, and that the central problem is one of self perceived status as inferior.
The solution is separation, separate political, economic and status systems.
Which is how we evolved.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-19 13:19:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163440329565069313
Reply addressees: @SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163440032205737984
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux The only possible counter proposition is that a given group is of such failure in genetics, ability, habits, culture, religion, and institutions, that it cannot engage in productive, voluntary cooperation with others.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163440032205737984
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux The only possible counter proposition is that a given group is of such failure in genetics, ability, habits, culture, religion, and institutions, that it cannot engage in productive, voluntary cooperation with others.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163440032205737984
The only possible counter proposition is that a given group is of such failure in genetics, ability, habits, culture, religion, and institutions, that it cannot engage in productive, voluntary cooperation with others.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-19 13:18:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163440032205737984
Reply addressees: @SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163439679758372864
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux Political power that is Egalitarian (open to all of merit and observance of the law) not Equalitarian (independent of merit and observancy of the law).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163439679758372864
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux Political power that is Egalitarian (open to all of merit and observance of the law) not Equalitarian (independent of merit and observancy of the law).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163439679758372864
Political power that is Egalitarian (open to all of merit and observance of the law) not Equalitarian (independent of merit and observancy of the law).
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-19 13:16:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163439679758372864
Reply addressees: @SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163439484802883584
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux Defense of all under the law. The purpose of political power being nothing other than the denial of violations of that law, and as a consequence the direction of all people to voluntary mutual cooperation.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163439484802883584
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux Defense of all under the law. The purpose of political power being nothing other than the denial of violations of that law, and as a consequence the direction of all people to voluntary mutual cooperation.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163439484802883584
Defense of all under the law. The purpose of political power being nothing other than the denial of violations of that law, and as a consequence the direction of all people to voluntary mutual cooperation.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-19 13:16:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163439484802883584
Reply addressees: @SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163439186885709824
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux We have always had it. It’s our law, the natural law.
Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Truth and Duty, Law and Jury, Voluntary Markets in association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, and polities.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163439186885709824
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux We have always had it. It’s our law, the natural law.
Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Truth and Duty, Law and Jury, Voluntary Markets in association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, and polities.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163439186885709824
We have always had it. It’s our law, the natural law.
Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Truth and Duty, Law and Jury, Voluntary Markets in association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, and polities.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-19 13:14:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163439186885709824
Reply addressees: @SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163437986853396482
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux The only problem facing western man in the ancient world and in the modern, is that we lacked a book of parables (histories) and scriptures (laws) beyond which no man or woman may tread.
That’s not true any longer. We have our “scripture” of the ancient and modern world.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163437986853396482
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux The only problem facing western man in the ancient world and in the modern, is that we lacked a book of parables (histories) and scriptures (laws) beyond which no man or woman may tread.
That’s not true any longer. We have our “scripture” of the ancient and modern world.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163437986853396482
The only problem facing western man in the ancient world and in the modern, is that we lacked a book of parables (histories) and scriptures (laws) beyond which no man or woman may tread.
That’s not true any longer. We have our “scripture” of the ancient and modern world.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-19 13:10:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163437986853396482
Reply addressees: @SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163437614843801601
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux … and the ignorance, poverty, suffering, of those who destroy them.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163437614843801601
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux … and the ignorance, poverty, suffering, of those who destroy them.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163437614843801601