—“the hippocampus does much more than encode individual episodes; rather, it adaptively transforms
initially-encoded episodic memories into organized conceptual knowledge that drives novel… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=453757051887857&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-24 06:31:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165149693279637504
That’s nonsense. Every single advance we make in genetics only supports darwin’s initial observations. Last year nature vs nurture fell. Right now we are ending indifference between genders and races. The postmodern attempt to create a pseudoscientific cult is coming to an end.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-24 03:40:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165106483136290817
Reply addressees: @RufusTFireflyJr @clairlemon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165031742547419142
IN REPLY TO:
@RufusTFireflyJr
@clairlemon Surprising to hear you say that, Claire. Perhaps spending too much time on twitter has made you beholden to your own orthodoxies. Gelerneter is a skeptic, and Darwinism has, uh, evolved from being a theory to being a an academic cult with tribes, rites and heresies.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165031742547419142
You aren’t stupid – on the other hand, *belief* in something out of faith, and *arguing* against science with sophism, innumeracy, and pseudoscience is somewhere between stupid and unethical. There is a difference. One does not justify faith. One practices it. One argues science.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-24 03:38:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165106042059022337
Reply addressees: @Coolish_Breeze @clairlemon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165039194210799617
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165039194210799617
Don’t be silly. This tripe has been running around intelligent design circles of late, and it is the worst bit of sophistry and innumeracy.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-24 03:35:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165105199482114048
Reply addressees: @ThirtyTyrants @clairlemon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165031435125874695
IN REPLY TO:
@ThirtyTyrants
@clairlemon You should read the article. Your snarky tweet doesn’t make you seem intelligent, just uninformed.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165031435125874695
—“More evidence that mathematicians can be stupid, too”–Claire Lehmann @clairlemon
….”(Renowned Yale Computer Science Prof Leaves Darwinism | The Stream David Gelernter recently… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=453700835226812&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-24 03:27:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165103219573481475
RT @clairlemon: More evidence that mathematicians can be stupid, too https://stream.org/renowned-yale-computer-science-prof-leaves-darwinism/
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-24 03:23:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165102383858429957
There is a moronic bit of innumeracy going around ‘intelligent design’ circles right now and he’s bit apparently taken the bait. The answer to their query is: evolutionary progress includes loss of intermediary information: it’s hard to reverse engineer cellular evolution.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-24 03:23:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165102264937324544
Reply addressees: @clairlemon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165101703483539456
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@clairlemon I write about this subject quite a bit because there are two origins to pervasive sophism in western civilization, regardless of field: mathematical idealism, and scriptural interpretation. Both of which stem from the same error.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1165101703483539456
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@clairlemon I write about this subject quite a bit because there are two origins to pervasive sophism in western civilization, regardless of field: mathematical idealism, and scriptural interpretation. Both of which stem from the same error.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1165101703483539456
I write about this subject quite a bit because there are two origins to pervasive sophism in western civilization, regardless of field: mathematical idealism, and scriptural interpretation. Both of which stem from the same error.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-24 03:21:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165101703483539456
Reply addressees: @clairlemon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165101315393036294
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@clairlemon Mathematics is the most simple of the logics, the logic of positional names. The greeks did everything with geometry. There is a good reason. Measurements (real) vs Language (ideal). And stuck with the consequences of treating math as a language – where nonsense can be said.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1165101315393036294
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@clairlemon Mathematics is the most simple of the logics, the logic of positional names. The greeks did everything with geometry. There is a good reason. Measurements (real) vs Language (ideal). And stuck with the consequences of treating math as a language – where nonsense can be said.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1165101315393036294
Mathematics is the most simple of the logics, the logic of positional names. The greeks did everything with geometry. There is a good reason. Measurements (real) vs Language (ideal). And stuck with the consequences of treating math as a language – where nonsense can be said.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-24 03:19:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165101315393036294
Reply addressees: @clairlemon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165100255014248448
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@clairlemon There is a great deal of woo woo in Mathematics – mathematical platonism, mathematical idealism, cantorian multiple infinities, many worlds, proof being positiva rather than negativa, the terms, labels, and symbolism all create nonsense.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1165100255014248448
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@clairlemon There is a great deal of woo woo in Mathematics – mathematical platonism, mathematical idealism, cantorian multiple infinities, many worlds, proof being positiva rather than negativa, the terms, labels, and symbolism all create nonsense.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1165100255014248448
There is a great deal of woo woo in Mathematics – mathematical platonism, mathematical idealism, cantorian multiple infinities, many worlds, proof being positiva rather than negativa, the terms, labels, and symbolism all create nonsense.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-24 03:15:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165100255014248448
Reply addressees: @clairlemon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165027124782092289
IN REPLY TO:
@clairlemon
More evidence that mathematicians can be stupid, too https://t.co/yzrDpx0vAW
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165027124782092289