—“Nature doesn’t contradict itself, neither should law if it’s based on nature.”—Daniel Jordan
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 23:39:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174105537597849600
—“Nature doesn’t contradict itself, neither should law if it’s based on nature.”—Daniel Jordan
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 23:39:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174105537597849600
TESTIMONY
by Bill Joslin
humans swim in a sea of testimony. Any information we gather beyond local and immediate scale as been gained through the testimony of others.
Because this is akin… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=467713383825557&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 23:37:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174105055521386496
GSRRM is admission of lack of argument, by resorting to poisoning the well, undermining, ad reputation destruction: the use of female’s conflict strategy of disapproval and outcasting in male’s rational discourse on the truth. π
https://propertarianism.com/2019/02/23/definition-gsrm-or-gsrrm/
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 22:27:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174087465872875520
Reply addressees: @jbouie
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174072740313276418
IN REPLY TO:
@jbouie
thereβs a lot you could critique about my writing and the arguments i choose to make but for whatever reason the standard line for guys like williamson is that iβm an ignorant know-nothing
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174072740313276418
Hmm. I’ve listed hundreds of hard questions, and every taboo in every variation, and they’re all decidable. We just don’t like the decision. Why? Always ends with cost, now vs later, consumption vs not, nationalism vs globalism, eugenics vs dysgenics: all the same question.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 22:18:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174085320259842048
Reply addressees: @JonHaidt
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174083724868280332
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable β we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174083724868280332
So unless one can define free will in operational terms, they are playing a parlor game of suggestion with you, not asking anything meaningful. There are few if any difficult questions that are not dependent upon suggestion by the frailty of the verb to be or similar conflation.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 22:11:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174083440515473412
Reply addressees: @SamHarrisOrg
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174082809272647681
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@SamHarrisOrg … must make predictions with sparse information using sparse information from past experiences in real time. most of our decisions are such errors, but we recalculate and adapt and adjust moment by moment, and our memory reassembles success or failure from fragments.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174082809272647681
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@SamHarrisOrg … must make predictions with sparse information using sparse information from past experiences in real time. most of our decisions are such errors, but we recalculate and adapt and adjust moment by moment, and our memory reassembles success or failure from fragments.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174082809272647681
… must make predictions with sparse information using sparse information from past experiences in real time. most of our decisions are such errors, but we recalculate and adapt and adjust moment by moment, and our memory reassembles success or failure from fragments.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 22:08:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174082809272647681
Reply addressees: @SamHarrisOrg
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174082438508752896
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@SamHarrisOrg Free Will like most philosophical parlor games is just a sophism, that frames (by suggestion) choice as a via positiva dependent upon knowledge, rather than prediction from field consisting largely of errors (via negativa). A suitably complex robot, like us,…
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174082438508752896
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@SamHarrisOrg Free Will like most philosophical parlor games is just a sophism, that frames (by suggestion) choice as a via positiva dependent upon knowledge, rather than prediction from field consisting largely of errors (via negativa). A suitably complex robot, like us,…
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174082438508752896
Free Will like most philosophical parlor games is just a sophism, that frames (by suggestion) choice as a via positiva dependent upon knowledge, rather than prediction from field consisting largely of errors (via negativa). A suitably complex robot, like us,…
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 22:07:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174082438508752896
Reply addressees: @SamHarrisOrg
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174075156681019392
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable β we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174075156681019392
It’s what we call ‘policing the commons of the disgusting thought, feeling, word, and deed’.And, while I’m not informed in pop culture, ‘grooming’ as I undrestand it refers to group rape gangs common among certain new european demographics. Rather disgusting to the conservatives.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 22:01:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174080876352815105
Reply addressees: @Brian_Alford @sarahfranks2120 @DineshDSouza
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174079724903026691
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable β we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174079724903026691
You must have a reading comprehension problem? Tutors are available. Let’s diagram the sentence. What’s the subject? “Those who seek to destroy…” followed by a list of what they destroy. And, they may state the target of their destruction by via positiva or via negativa means.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 21:58:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174080122225385473
Reply addressees: @Brian_Alford @sarahfranks2120 @DineshDSouza
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174078841481875456
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable β we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174078841481875456
We must help children to enlightenment, the willing and able to the good, the unwilling and unable to prison or gallows, one way or the other.;)
lolz -hugs
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 21:53:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174078891654361090
Reply addressees: @sarahfranks2120 @Brian_Alford @DineshDSouza
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174038205219389442
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable β we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174038205219389442