Source date (UTC): 2019-09-18 17:03:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174368423016566787
Source: Twitter X
-
We have our weapons because of you
We have our weapons because of you.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-18 17:00:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174367642339172352
Reply addressees: @willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174367530472923137
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke There is no ‘we’. We can peacefully separate and return to a federation of states for the single purpose of defense, returning local control over local policy to the local people, or we will roll the dice on whether we win, you win, or, if it lasts six months, no one wins.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174367530472923137
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke There is no ‘we’. We can peacefully separate and return to a federation of states for the single purpose of defense, returning local control over local policy to the local people, or we will roll the dice on whether we win, you win, or, if it lasts six months, no one wins.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174367530472923137
-
There is no ‘we’. We can peacefully separate and return to a federation of state
There is no ‘we’. We can peacefully separate and return to a federation of states for the single purpose of defense, returning local control over local policy to the local people, or we will roll the dice on whether we win, you win, or, if it lasts six months, no one wins.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-18 17:00:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174367530472923137
Reply addressees: @willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174367164645728256
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke And every agitation you conduct against that law of reciprocity – our “political religion” – moves one step closer to turning this civil war from one of words, political infighting, and sporadic violence, into the bloodiest in human history – so, please, by all means continue.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174367164645728256
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke And every agitation you conduct against that law of reciprocity – our “political religion” – moves one step closer to turning this civil war from one of words, political infighting, and sporadic violence, into the bloodiest in human history – so, please, by all means continue.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174367164645728256
-
And every agitation you conduct against that law of reciprocity – our “political
And every agitation you conduct against that law of reciprocity – our “political religion” – moves one step closer to turning this civil war from one of words, political infighting, and sporadic violence, into the bloodiest in human history – so, please, by all means continue.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-18 16:58:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174367164645728256
Reply addressees: @willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174366508249747456
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke So if you are just mistaken, then it’s worth educating you. If you are instead, continuing your campaign to destroy the first written Constitution of Natural Law (reciprocity) for the first middle class civilization(the third way), then that is why we have arms – to stop you.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174366508249747456
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke So if you are just mistaken, then it’s worth educating you. If you are instead, continuing your campaign to destroy the first written Constitution of Natural Law (reciprocity) for the first middle class civilization(the third way), then that is why we have arms – to stop you.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174366508249747456
-
So if you are just mistaken, then it’s worth educating you. If you are instead,
So if you are just mistaken, then it’s worth educating you. If you are instead, continuing your campaign to destroy the first written Constitution of Natural Law (reciprocity) for the first middle class civilization(the third way), then that is why we have arms – to stop you.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-18 16:56:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174366508249747456
Reply addressees: @willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174365739941130240
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke Under rule of law people have no choice to obtain status and consumption by any other means that the voluntary service of others in markets for association, production, reproduction, commons production, and polity production. Every alternative is just one excuse or another.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174365739941130240
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke Under rule of law people have no choice to obtain status and consumption by any other means that the voluntary service of others in markets for association, production, reproduction, commons production, and polity production. Every alternative is just one excuse or another.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174365739941130240
-
Under rule of law people have no choice to obtain status and consumption by any
Under rule of law people have no choice to obtain status and consumption by any other means that the voluntary service of others in markets for association, production, reproduction, commons production, and polity production. Every alternative is just one excuse or another.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-18 16:53:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174365739941130240
Reply addressees: @willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174365224071307269
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke America, the anglo countries, and the germanic countries, are ‘special’ not because of government, but because we have rule of law. The world does not need democracy, and continues to rebel against it. They need rule of law. With rule of law the form of government is irrelevant.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174365224071307269
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke America, the anglo countries, and the germanic countries, are ‘special’ not because of government, but because we have rule of law. The world does not need democracy, and continues to rebel against it. They need rule of law. With rule of law the form of government is irrelevant.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174365224071307269
-
America, the anglo countries, and the germanic countries, are ‘special’ not beca
America, the anglo countries, and the germanic countries, are ‘special’ not because of government, but because we have rule of law. The world does not need democracy, and continues to rebel against it. They need rule of law. With rule of law the form of government is irrelevant.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-18 16:51:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174365224071307269
Reply addressees: @willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174364950535561216
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke But the Conservatism is EMPIRICAL not IDEAL and we hold to rule of law (sovereignty, reciprocity, jury) and limit state, houses, and polity from violating that rule of law – and we are the only people to have built a civilization upon it, and a majority middle class b/c of it.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174364950535561216
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke But the Conservatism is EMPIRICAL not IDEAL and we hold to rule of law (sovereignty, reciprocity, jury) and limit state, houses, and polity from violating that rule of law – and we are the only people to have built a civilization upon it, and a majority middle class b/c of it.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174364950535561216
-
But the Conservatism is EMPIRICAL not IDEAL and we hold to rule of law (sovereig
But the Conservatism is EMPIRICAL not IDEAL and we hold to rule of law (sovereignty, reciprocity, jury) and limit state, houses, and polity from violating that rule of law – and we are the only people to have built a civilization upon it, and a majority middle class b/c of it.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-18 16:49:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174364950535561216
Reply addressees: @willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174364567784361985
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke I don’t know if you (Will) are ignorant or intellectually dishonest by inverting the relationship between Rule of Law (Reciprocity(natural) vs substantive(Rights) vs formalist (Procedure) vs Functional (arbitrary), and Democracy (means of choosing priority of commons within law).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174364567784361985
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke I don’t know if you (Will) are ignorant or intellectually dishonest by inverting the relationship between Rule of Law (Reciprocity(natural) vs substantive(Rights) vs formalist (Procedure) vs Functional (arbitrary), and Democracy (means of choosing priority of commons within law).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174364567784361985
-
I don’t know if you (Will) are ignorant or intellectually dishonest by inverting
I don’t know if you (Will) are ignorant or intellectually dishonest by inverting the relationship between Rule of Law (Reciprocity(natural) vs substantive(Rights) vs formalist (Procedure) vs Functional (arbitrary), and Democracy (means of choosing priority of commons within law).
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-18 16:48:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174364567784361985
Reply addressees: @willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174363590721245191
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke It’s not a hostility to democracy(Mob Rule), it’s a hostility to your continued undermining of Rule of Law (Reciprocity, Tort, Trespass), by incrementally deceiving the population that there any means: authoritarian, political, democratic of legitimizes violation of rule of law.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174363590721245191
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke It’s not a hostility to democracy(Mob Rule), it’s a hostility to your continued undermining of Rule of Law (Reciprocity, Tort, Trespass), by incrementally deceiving the population that there any means: authoritarian, political, democratic of legitimizes violation of rule of law.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174363590721245191
-
It’s not a hostility to democracy(Mob Rule), it’s a hostility to your continued
It’s not a hostility to democracy(Mob Rule), it’s a hostility to your continued undermining of Rule of Law (Reciprocity, Tort, Trespass), by incrementally deceiving the population that there any means: authoritarian, political, democratic of legitimizes violation of rule of law.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-18 16:44:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174363590721245191
Reply addressees: @willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174360008080941056
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174360008080941056