RT @DrSueOosthuizen: 14. Bailey called this a ‘wide’ open field system because the farmers had ‘wide’ rights to graze in the fallows. And…
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-20 21:32:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175160747858546689
Source: Twitter X
-
Which is wonderful – Depoliticizing of Religion by deconflating religion law, hi
Which is wonderful – Depoliticizing of Religion by deconflating religion law, history, and science again, after the monotheistic attempt at conflation. Evolution: Burial/Spirits, Feast/Sacrifice,Ancestors/Seasons, Oath/Heroes, Gods – restoration of harmony from competition.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-20 20:40:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175147711370289152
Reply addressees: @Communism_Kills
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175145912387211265
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175145912387211265
-
RT @curtdoolittle: @RedbeardWrath @TOOEdit Revolution, Restoration, Reformation,
RT @curtdoolittle: @RedbeardWrath @TOOEdit Revolution, Restoration, Reformation, Restitution.
Never has an empire been so fragile, a people…
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-20 17:59:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175107272298631168
-
The President is Protecting YOU, from US
The President is Protecting YOU, from US. https://propertarianism.com/2019/09/20/the-president-is-protecting-you-from-us/
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-20 17:32:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175100485935804417
-
So you have it backwards. The president is protecting you, from us
So you have it backwards. The president is protecting you, from us.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-20 17:28:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175099512936968192
Reply addressees: @willwilkinson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175099312990240768
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@willwilkinson Democracy is somewhere between a limited luxury good and a catastrophic means of hyperconsumption of accumulated civilizational capital in all its forms. We are wealthy because of what remains of rule of law, and the germanic rule of law. The ultimate achievement of our politics.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175099312990240768
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@willwilkinson Democracy is somewhere between a limited luxury good and a catastrophic means of hyperconsumption of accumulated civilizational capital in all its forms. We are wealthy because of what remains of rule of law, and the germanic rule of law. The ultimate achievement of our politics.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175099312990240768
-
Democracy is somewhere between a limited luxury good and a catastrophic means of
Democracy is somewhere between a limited luxury good and a catastrophic means of hyperconsumption of accumulated civilizational capital in all its forms. We are wealthy because of what remains of rule of law, and the germanic rule of law. The ultimate achievement of our politics.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-20 17:28:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175099312990240768
Reply addressees: @willwilkinson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175098799187988480
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@willwilkinson You have no moral foundation for dysgenia, capital consumption, population expansion, or redistribution over investment in the productivity of commons. You simply use sentimental appeal to sell false promise to those whose existence is carried entirely by white men over 35.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175098799187988480
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@willwilkinson You have no moral foundation for dysgenia, capital consumption, population expansion, or redistribution over investment in the productivity of commons. You simply use sentimental appeal to sell false promise to those whose existence is carried entirely by white men over 35.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175098799187988480
-
You have no moral foundation for dysgenia, capital consumption, population expan
You have no moral foundation for dysgenia, capital consumption, population expansion, or redistribution over investment in the productivity of commons. You simply use sentimental appeal to sell false promise to those whose existence is carried entirely by white men over 35.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-20 17:26:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175098799187988480
Reply addressees: @willwilkinson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175098311650549760
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@willwilkinson For example what is the cost of one point of aggregate IQ? What is the cost of loss of rule of law? So if The President is trying to retain, and capital, and rule of law that produces it, by using power, then it is the peaceful alternative to the Right’s restoration by violence.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175098311650549760
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@willwilkinson For example what is the cost of one point of aggregate IQ? What is the cost of loss of rule of law? So if The President is trying to retain, and capital, and rule of law that produces it, by using power, then it is the peaceful alternative to the Right’s restoration by violence.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175098311650549760
-
For example what is the cost of one point of aggregate IQ? What is the cost of l
For example what is the cost of one point of aggregate IQ? What is the cost of loss of rule of law? So if The President is trying to retain, and capital, and rule of law that produces it, by using power, then it is the peaceful alternative to the Right’s restoration by violence.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-20 17:24:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175098311650549760
Reply addressees: @willwilkinson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175097755993329664
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@willwilkinson Well that’s not quite true right? Violence is a resource. Power is a resource. The question is only whether that resource can be put to good(production of capital) or ill (consumption or loss of capital). How would you measure the capital losses under your neoliberalism?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175097755993329664
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@willwilkinson Well that’s not quite true right? Violence is a resource. Power is a resource. The question is only whether that resource can be put to good(production of capital) or ill (consumption or loss of capital). How would you measure the capital losses under your neoliberalism?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175097755993329664
-
Well that’s not quite true right? Violence is a resource. Power is a resource. T
Well that’s not quite true right? Violence is a resource. Power is a resource. The question is only whether that resource can be put to good(production of capital) or ill (consumption or loss of capital). How would you measure the capital losses under your neoliberalism?
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-20 17:21:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175097755993329664
Reply addressees: @willwilkinson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175066479416500235
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175066479416500235
-
Great. Thanks Butch. 😉
Great. Thanks Butch. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-20 17:11:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175095156741214209
Reply addressees: @PoseidonAwoke
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175081463307538433
IN REPLY TO:
@PoseidonAwoke
@curtdoolittle I’m not sure about your abstraction, but in particular we see a lack of predictability in astrophysics, which is why Dark Matter was invented: as a fudge to explain why their predictions weren’t working. I’m very skeptical of it now.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175081463307538433