RT @tonymc39: This is brilliant… how to describe Twitter to someone who has never used it. https://t.co/Ui31VMJsix
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 12:20:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180820071523987457
Source: Twitter X
-
Clue: There isn’t going to be a post Trump america for political parties to squa
Clue: There isn’t going to be a post Trump america for political parties to squabble over. Revolutions are always suspect in prospect but deterministic in retrospect. We will have around 100M dead because of you.
I don’t make many mistakes. And this isn’t one either.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 12:17:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180819456462905345
Reply addressees: @whignewtons
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180577601372508161
IN REPLY TO:
@whignewtons
A lot of quiet conversations among conservative thought leaders today about how to prepare for a “post Trump” Republican Party—whether its impeachment or a loss in 2020. People thinking about how that shakes out and where they fit. This is not good for Trump.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180577601372508161
-
( It’s out of context. )
( It’s out of context. )
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 12:14:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180818549591420928
Reply addressees: @NickmhTw
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180818304593584128
IN REPLY TO:
@nickTw7m47amfe
@curtdoolittle 🤔😏😂🤣😂🤣😉
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180818304593584128
-
(… revisiting…) Just want to throw in here that operational proofs are possi
(… revisiting…) Just want to throw in here that operational proofs are possibilities, but they are still just falsificationary, not justificationary.Either one can produce a more parsimonious competitor or one can’t.The fact something isn’t perfect doesn’t mean it’s not best.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 12:13:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180818342917148672
Reply addressees: @PoseidonAwoke
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180786180847067136
IN REPLY TO:
@PoseidonAwoke
@curtdoolittle Labeling clearly rational work as “mysticism” is an attempt to “no true Scottsman” academia: “That wasn’t _real_ academic work on display, it was _religion_”.
Nah. That’s academia: A network of “social proof” (consensus/authority) void of operational proofs.Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180786180847067136
-
PLEASE STOP BEING A USEFUL IDIOT ON BEHALF OF THE LEFT: LIBERTARIAN MEANS ‘USEFU
PLEASE STOP BEING A USEFUL IDIOT ON BEHALF OF THE LEFT: LIBERTARIAN MEANS ‘USEFUL IDIOT”
—“For me the last part best manifests itself within the ideas of libertarianism.”—psionin… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=479213966008832&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 12:07:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180816914588798976
-
So please stop being a useful idiot. I use Sovereigntarian, or rule of law of re
So please stop being a useful idiot. I use Sovereigntarian, or rule of law of reciprocity, or rule of law monarchy, or classical liberal. Libertarian in the hayekian sense means Classical Liberalism. Libertarianism in the Rothbardian sense just means “useful idiot”.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 12:05:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180816295861858304
Reply addressees: @psionin
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180815686504980480
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@psionin Libertarianism is just demand for a commune of private rather than common property at best, or an excuse to fool high trust european peoples into hosting parasitic peoples who specialize in profit from baiting into moral hazard, under the pretense of doing no harm.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180815686504980480
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@psionin Libertarianism is just demand for a commune of private rather than common property at best, or an excuse to fool high trust european peoples into hosting parasitic peoples who specialize in profit from baiting into moral hazard, under the pretense of doing no harm.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180815686504980480
-
Libertarianism is just demand for a commune of private rather than common proper
Libertarianism is just demand for a commune of private rather than common property at best, or an excuse to fool high trust european peoples into hosting parasitic peoples who specialize in profit from baiting into moral hazard, under the pretense of doing no harm.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 12:02:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180815686504980480
Reply addressees: @psionin
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180815262301540353
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@psionin If not, then the polity cannot survive competition in the market for territories, population and social, economic, and political order. Which is why there are no libertarian polities, and never will be.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180815262301540353
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@psionin If not, then the polity cannot survive competition in the market for territories, population and social, economic, and political order. Which is why there are no libertarian polities, and never will be.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180815262301540353
-
If not, then the polity cannot survive competition in the market for territories
If not, then the polity cannot survive competition in the market for territories, population and social, economic, and political order. Which is why there are no libertarian polities, and never will be.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 12:01:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180815262301540353
Reply addressees: @psionin
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180814709928448000
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@psionin So Rothbardians destroyed the term liberty as the left destroyed the term liberal. Either we have a militia in which every man holding the franchise defends rule of law under sovereignty and reciprocity, and produces commons necessary for survival of the polity – or not.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180814709928448000
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@psionin So Rothbardians destroyed the term liberty as the left destroyed the term liberal. Either we have a militia in which every man holding the franchise defends rule of law under sovereignty and reciprocity, and produces commons necessary for survival of the polity – or not.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180814709928448000
-
So Rothbardians destroyed the term liberty as the left destroyed the term libera
So Rothbardians destroyed the term liberty as the left destroyed the term liberal. Either we have a militia in which every man holding the franchise defends rule of law under sovereignty and reciprocity, and produces commons necessary for survival of the polity – or not.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 11:58:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180814709928448000
Reply addressees: @psionin
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180814232344055808
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@psionin Rothbardians turned ‘libertarianism’ from Classical Liberalism under Rule of Law to Ghetto Ethics of diasporic peoples having no, and taking no, responsibility for commons. It’s just common property parasitism rather than private property parasitism.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180814232344055808
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@psionin Rothbardians turned ‘libertarianism’ from Classical Liberalism under Rule of Law to Ghetto Ethics of diasporic peoples having no, and taking no, responsibility for commons. It’s just common property parasitism rather than private property parasitism.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180814232344055808
-
Rothbardians turned ‘libertarianism’ from Classical Liberalism under Rule of Law
Rothbardians turned ‘libertarianism’ from Classical Liberalism under Rule of Law to Ghetto Ethics of diasporic peoples having no, and taking no, responsibility for commons. It’s just common property parasitism rather than private property parasitism.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 11:57:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180814232344055808
Reply addressees: @psionin
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180813951891918849
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@psionin Libertarianism is just common property marxism. So “For me” means you don’t understand that the only source of Sovereignty, Liberty, Freedom and Prosperity is rule of law, producing markets for everything, including *commons*, or what we call ‘government’.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180813951891918849
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@psionin Libertarianism is just common property marxism. So “For me” means you don’t understand that the only source of Sovereignty, Liberty, Freedom and Prosperity is rule of law, producing markets for everything, including *commons*, or what we call ‘government’.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180813951891918849