RT @lcltz: @TOOEdit Study has some gender data too.
Almost like the 1960s & beyond weren’t such a good thing. https://t.co/80wgGxRpE3

Source date (UTC): 2019-10-08 11:50:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181537384577601536
RT @lcltz: @TOOEdit Study has some gender data too.
Almost like the 1960s & beyond weren’t such a good thing. https://t.co/80wgGxRpE3

Source date (UTC): 2019-10-08 11:50:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181537384577601536
I think this is another example of different experiences, and yes, guys who run big organizations do not think about things like ordinary people, and visa versa. Which is a failure of our education system to teach ordinary people.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-08 00:42:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181369345378783232
Reply addressees: @ocse01
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181368470811729922
IN REPLY TO:
@ocse01
@curtdoolittle not only oversimplifying but also not considering obvious moral hazard of a public institution. also
+millitary budget =+ deployment cost
says nothing of what it actually cost to deploy a soldier but what money we have to dump into it.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181368470811729922
No it’s a way of measuring any organization. For example what’s the difference in apple’s revenue, cost, and profit vs microsoft? Vs Walmart? Compare that to the total cost of soldiers and their means of production of violence. same thing. And that comparison is insightful.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-08 00:26:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181365245937356802
Reply addressees: @ocse01
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181349335671300096
IN REPLY TO:
@ocse01
@curtdoolittle from what i read its accounting manipulation. like dropping the moab for shits and giggles oh man that pilot really cost us a bunch of money.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181349335671300096
Google cost per soldier per year and go thru the listings. The cost of the salary nothing. the cost per soldier is insane.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 22:28:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181335607311847425
Reply addressees: @ocse01
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181335444941877248
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@ocse01 Publications put out every year by various agencies. Total cost of an operation divided by the number of men to carry it out. It’s sounds ridiculous to you because you aren’t in biz where we talk about revenue per employee, cost per employee as comparative profit or efficiency.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1181335444941877248
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@ocse01 Publications put out every year by various agencies. Total cost of an operation divided by the number of men to carry it out. It’s sounds ridiculous to you because you aren’t in biz where we talk about revenue per employee, cost per employee as comparative profit or efficiency.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1181335444941877248
Publications put out every year by various agencies. Total cost of an operation divided by the number of men to carry it out. It’s sounds ridiculous to you because you aren’t in biz where we talk about revenue per employee, cost per employee as comparative profit or efficiency.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 22:28:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181335444941877248
Reply addressees: @ocse01
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181332492487258112
IN REPLY TO:
@ocse01
@curtdoolittle no way
where is this figure from
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181332492487258112
Well you know, that’s pretty much the entire purpose of the work right? To end the industrialization of lying made possible by the industrialization of communication? I mean, if we know what truthful speech is, and what is not, then we can have free truthful but not untruthful.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 21:57:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181327695080300546
Reply addressees: @LLaddon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181325542882045952
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181325542882045952
I understand perfectly.
I’m perfectly happy if y’all leave me to write in peace and ‘co opt’ the project.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 21:45:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181324693971914755
Reply addressees: @LLaddon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181324455055970304
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181324455055970304
For those in the libertarian movement sure. 😉
But it’s gotta be bulletproof because the bitchy-tariat will come after me with knives. lol
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 21:43:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181324206740529152
Reply addressees: @LLaddon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181323852112158721
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181323852112158721
I’m not tracking. I’m suggesting that military scale and trade policy, and possibly information policy are necessary means of defense of a people, and that imperial scale is the cheapest means of obtaining it, while locals need only small arms, militias, and a few nukes.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 21:41:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181323790837526539
Reply addressees: @LLaddon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181322160759099393
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181322160759099393
I don’t do ethos, even though people want me to, i just do the law. As far as I know ethos is reciprocity, and within each polity, reciprocity is dependent upon the network of agreements – contracts of the commons, including command, legislation, regulation, norm, and tradition.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 21:40:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181323413018812422
Reply addressees: @LLaddon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181323079882100736
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181323079882100736