RT @TheEconomist: Economics is even less popular among girls than maths https://econ.st/2W2jQgP
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 20:36:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187105624745828355
Source: Twitter X
-
“Once you understand humanity to the extent Propertarianism explains, it’s not h
—“Once you understand humanity to the extent Propertarianism explains, it’s not hard to predict the broad strokes. (A key insight is understanding why the left & large segments of humanity cannot be reasoned with.)”— John Mark
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 20:35:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187105270763347969
-
PEOPLE CHOSE THEIR SELF INTEREST – ONE CREATED FOR THEM TO CHOOSE, BUT WHICH WAS
PEOPLE CHOSE THEIR SELF INTEREST – ONE CREATED FOR THEM TO CHOOSE, BUT WHICH WAS SUICIDAL
—“… so People figured out the game was a losing battle & decided to withdraw from society &… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=491296481467247&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 20:33:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187104895775772674
-
The used Marxism to undermine compromise between the classes, Feminism to underm
The used Marxism to undermine compromise between the classes, Feminism to undermine compromise between genders, Postmodernism to undermine identities, families, traditions, eugenics, science, and truth itself – and outright denial (political correctness) to suppress debate.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 20:30:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187104144655560706
Reply addressees: @MakMcdaddy @fryskefilosoof
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187103736403054592
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@MakMcdaddy @fryskefilosoof They chose to follow their interests, which were interests created deliberately by our enemies: undermine rule of law, trust, norms, traditions, and the intergenerational family as the central institution of society, b/c of its natural effect of limiting parasitism and dysgenia.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1187103736403054592
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@MakMcdaddy @fryskefilosoof They chose to follow their interests, which were interests created deliberately by our enemies: undermine rule of law, trust, norms, traditions, and the intergenerational family as the central institution of society, b/c of its natural effect of limiting parasitism and dysgenia.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1187103736403054592
-
They chose to follow their interests, which were interests created deliberately
They chose to follow their interests, which were interests created deliberately by our enemies: undermine rule of law, trust, norms, traditions, and the intergenerational family as the central institution of society, b/c of its natural effect of limiting parasitism and dysgenia.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 20:29:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187103736403054592
Reply addressees: @MakMcdaddy @fryskefilosoof
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187095963535577090
IN REPLY TO:
@Matt_Monroe_
@curtdoolittle @fryskefilosoof Because people figured out the game was a losing battle & decided to withdraw from society & their obligations to that society?
People have chosen an easier route, stop including those which make their lives harder…
So we grow cold toward on another?Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187095963535577090
-
The bias, ambitions, and past actions of the whistleblower will end his legitima
The bias, ambitions, and past actions of the whistleblower will end his legitimacy, and so they want to preserve the chaos. They have already burt their entire field of candidates, and they’re getting ready to bring back hillary, so we need to shift our focus.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 19:56:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187095532755394563
Reply addressees: @realDonaldTrump
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186985677176655872
IN REPLY TO:
@realDonaldTrump
Where’s the Whistleblower?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186985677176655872
-
Like anything else, proportional taxation and proportional insurance – as long a
Like anything else, proportional taxation and proportional insurance – as long as costs and returns are shared we continue to support each other. We just must eliminate free riding on top as well as bottom.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 19:09:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187083563910516736
Reply addressees: @fryskefilosoof
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187082326926352387
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@fryskefilosoof Great question. (a) yes the family, otherwise we have the rapid expansion of bad families like we have in the 20th. (b) That does not mean that if a family’s means of provision of care are exhausted we cannot insure the family from destitution – that’s irreciprocal (moral hazard)
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1187082326926352387
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@fryskefilosoof Great question. (a) yes the family, otherwise we have the rapid expansion of bad families like we have in the 20th. (b) That does not mean that if a family’s means of provision of care are exhausted we cannot insure the family from destitution – that’s irreciprocal (moral hazard)
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1187082326926352387
-
My reading list is on the site under Main menu > propertarianism > reading list.
My reading list is on the site under Main menu > propertarianism > reading list. But let me ask followers their opinion. Because they say once you get propertarian ethics, and the grammars, Abrahamism and GSRRM, that’s most of it. Testimonialism is harder -takes more practice.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 19:08:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187083295793831938
Reply addressees: @fryskefilosoof
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187082470858149888
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187082470858149888
-
Great question. (a) yes the family, otherwise we have the rapid expansion of bad
Great question. (a) yes the family, otherwise we have the rapid expansion of bad families like we have in the 20th. (b) That does not mean that if a family’s means of provision of care are exhausted we cannot insure the family from destitution – that’s irreciprocal (moral hazard)
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 19:04:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187082326926352387
Reply addressees: @fryskefilosoof
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187080167421816832
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187080167421816832
-
And yes, most of it is the vocabulary and particularly the vocabulary in series
And yes, most of it is the vocabulary and particularly the vocabulary in series format.Once you get it’s a system of measurement, and a logic like any other, it starts fitting together. Some of the guys are getting better than I am now in some parts of it. You will too. I see it.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 19:02:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187081825736372226
Reply addressees: @fryskefilosoof
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187081484726878208
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@fryskefilosoof Well, you’re asking for help in the best way possible. 😉 I’ll help you however I can. Yes the learning curve is steep but the value of “OMG now I get THIS TOO!!’ experience never ends. Ask Bill. It really is like the scientific revolution for psychology, sociology, politics.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1187081484726878208
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@fryskefilosoof Well, you’re asking for help in the best way possible. 😉 I’ll help you however I can. Yes the learning curve is steep but the value of “OMG now I get THIS TOO!!’ experience never ends. Ask Bill. It really is like the scientific revolution for psychology, sociology, politics.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1187081484726878208