If you are an intellectual, activist, or evangelist, anywhere along the centrist, libertarian, constitutionalist, conservative, christian, or even fascist spectrum and you aren’t following me, then you’re missing out on the only people who have a constitutional solution to NOW.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-25 00:30:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187526774583955456
Either Molyneux or Kinsella needs to get hair implants because it’s impossible to tell bald Rothbardians apart from profile picture in a twitter feed, when their sophisms are so similar 😉
lolz
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-25 00:27:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187526070448377856
(Confused Stefan with Stephan there … again. One of you needs to get hair implants.)
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-25 00:23:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187525041056911360
Reply addressees: @NSKinsella
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187514040303706112
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@NSKinsella (Which is how Rothbard, in typical fashion, leaves the door open for voluntary, but otherwise ir-reciprocal parasitism, by such means of blackmail, baiting into hazard, the sufficiency of volition alone, despite externalities, and plausible deniability of having done so.)
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1187514040303706112
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@NSKinsella (Which is how Rothbard, in typical fashion, leaves the door open for voluntary, but otherwise ir-reciprocal parasitism, by such means of blackmail, baiting into hazard, the sufficiency of volition alone, despite externalities, and plausible deniability of having done so.)
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1187514040303706112
TRUTH ABOUT HUMAN BEINGS
People are rational actors acting in their rational self interests, that observe the minimum conformance to rule, procedure, norm, tradition, regulation,… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=492129601383935&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-25 00:20:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187524407104811008
OUCH
—“I should probably inaugurate The Libertarian Theory Podcast. I know it would be poplar. And I don’t even want to make money. So no ads. But then, why bother. Nevermind.”—Stephan… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=492118904718338&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 23:58:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187518679443038211
Exactly why I can’t watch even five minutes of it.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 23:46:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187515745246298113
Reply addressees: @I_Vae_Victis_I @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187512644594491392
IN REPLY TO:
@I_Vae_Victis_I
You never should mix Star Wars with Abrahamism.
@curtdoolittle
@JohnMarkSays https://t.co/TtwUHY4Web
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187512644594491392
(Which is how Rothbard, in typical fashion, leaves the door open for voluntary, but otherwise ir-reciprocal parasitism, by such means of blackmail, baiting into hazard, the sufficiency of volition alone, despite externalities, and plausible deniability of having done so.)
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 23:39:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187514040303706112
Reply addressees: @NSKinsella
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187513124183777281
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@NSKinsella Reciprocity: Productive, Fully informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Transfer of Demonstrated Interests, Free of imposition of Costs upon the Demonstrated interests of the others by externality. This describes all property possible, not just intersubjectively verifiable, or subjective.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1187513124183777281
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@NSKinsella Reciprocity: Productive, Fully informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Transfer of Demonstrated Interests, Free of imposition of Costs upon the Demonstrated interests of the others by externality. This describes all property possible, not just intersubjectively verifiable, or subjective.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1187513124183777281
Reciprocity: Productive, Fully informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Transfer of Demonstrated Interests, Free of imposition of Costs upon the Demonstrated interests of the others by externality. This describes all property possible, not just intersubjectively verifiable, or subjective.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 23:36:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187513124183777281
Reply addressees: @NSKinsella
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187512359084011527
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@NSKinsella I can’t tell if you’re trolling, intellectually dishonest, or overlooking the obvious. How can one claim action in defense of, and retaliation for, ir-reciprocity, is an aggression? How can one construct a condition of sovereignty and reciprocity, otherwise? Wishful thinking?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1187512359084011527
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@NSKinsella I can’t tell if you’re trolling, intellectually dishonest, or overlooking the obvious. How can one claim action in defense of, and retaliation for, ir-reciprocity, is an aggression? How can one construct a condition of sovereignty and reciprocity, otherwise? Wishful thinking?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1187512359084011527
I can’t tell if you’re trolling, intellectually dishonest, or overlooking the obvious. How can one claim action in defense of, and retaliation for, ir-reciprocity, is an aggression? How can one construct a condition of sovereignty and reciprocity, otherwise? Wishful thinking?
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 23:33:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187512359084011527
Reply addressees: @NSKinsella
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187491418819969030
IN REPLY TO:
@NSKinsella
@curtdoolittle So, you’re in favor of aggression? Hitting innocent people in the head with bricks, for example? Or not? Just to be clear.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187491418819969030
They can’t acknowledge that they’re using the ideas, because it could cause a negative association – and the are in the business of self promotion. But I make intellectual weaponry and I’m happy to find as many customers who use it against the enemy as possible. That’s my reward.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 23:29:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187511337431244804
Reply addressees: @Nationalist7346 @CheshireCynical @AnnCoulter @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187510645538852864
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187510645538852864