Charlie Sheen Halloween Costume:
1. Messy Hair.
2. Sunglasses,
3. Cigarette Butt,
4. Half Empty Scotch Bottle.
5. Flip Flops.
6. And Naked.
Cheap and guaranteed to draw attention.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-26 20:14:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188187170718322688
—“You know, the Spartans used to throw them off cliffs. Now they annoy us in church, restaurants, and public places.”—
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-26 20:12:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188186604172644352
—“I usually tell myself it’s cynical to think MOST women don’t reciprocate enough – but it’s a common enough occurrence that it’s important to test such things before any commitments.
One… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=493348134595415&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-26 18:55:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188167372877848583
WE HAVE LESS THAN TWELVE MONTHS
Soros explains that by taking down Trump and blocking Brexit that the globalists will win against the nationalists in 2020. I agree that the threat is real. We… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=493344597929102&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-26 18:48:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188165441845374977
Don’t need to. That understanding is easy to articulate. the problem is we like to lie so much we deny it.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-26 16:54:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188136776579371011
Reply addressees: @EricLiford
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188088438387597316
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188088438387597316
And there is no means of overriding the law. even Governemnt can only act wthin it. and all are liable otherwise.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-26 16:53:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188136562225221634
Reply addressees: @directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188136364405153792
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays So localities can choose means of decision within their locality (locality, county, city-state, province, state) but that decision making is limited to the production of commons, and the prohibition on irreciprocal display, word, and deed. In other words – no lies: transparency.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188136364405153792
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays So localities can choose means of decision within their locality (locality, county, city-state, province, state) but that decision making is limited to the production of commons, and the prohibition on irreciprocal display, word, and deed. In other words – no lies: transparency.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188136364405153792
So localities can choose means of decision within their locality (locality, county, city-state, province, state) but that decision making is limited to the production of commons, and the prohibition on irreciprocal display, word, and deed. In other words – no lies: transparency.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-26 16:52:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188136364405153792
Reply addressees: @directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188135860816039937
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays This will de-politicize the polity, and convert the entirety of government to citizen jury approving or vetoing, instead of politicians. We are no longer geographically constrained. The means of assent or veto varies from equi-representation, to class, to proportional$ to direct$
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188135860816039937
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays This will de-politicize the polity, and convert the entirety of government to citizen jury approving or vetoing, instead of politicians. We are no longer geographically constrained. The means of assent or veto varies from equi-representation, to class, to proportional$ to direct$
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188135860816039937
This will de-politicize the polity, and convert the entirety of government to citizen jury approving or vetoing, instead of politicians. We are no longer geographically constrained. The means of assent or veto varies from equi-representation, to class, to proportional$ to direct$
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-26 16:50:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188135860816039937
Reply addressees: @directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188135266030149633
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays For europeans I propose Judiciary, Monarchy as judge of last resort (veto, swiss method), Houses for Classes and Genders as Juries, Universal Petition of the Government with Proposed Contracts of the Commons. Restores jury (veto) and eliminates politicians. Much much more….
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188135266030149633
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays For europeans I propose Judiciary, Monarchy as judge of last resort (veto, swiss method), Houses for Classes and Genders as Juries, Universal Petition of the Government with Proposed Contracts of the Commons. Restores jury (veto) and eliminates politicians. Much much more….
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188135266030149633
For europeans I propose Judiciary, Monarchy as judge of last resort (veto, swiss method), Houses for Classes and Genders as Juries, Universal Petition of the Government with Proposed Contracts of the Commons. Restores jury (veto) and eliminates politicians. Much much more….
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-26 16:48:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188135266030149633
Reply addressees: @directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188134554705580032
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays Using text instead of voice, teaches others as well. 😉
Rule of law is more important than govt. So Rule of Law first. Next govt (production of commons) scales up down between war, going concern, windfalls of wealth. We include options on how to make decisions within the law.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188134554705580032
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays Using text instead of voice, teaches others as well. 😉
Rule of law is more important than govt. So Rule of Law first. Next govt (production of commons) scales up down between war, going concern, windfalls of wealth. We include options on how to make decisions within the law.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188134554705580032
Using text instead of voice, teaches others as well. 😉
Rule of law is more important than govt. So Rule of Law first. Next govt (production of commons) scales up down between war, going concern, windfalls of wealth. We include options on how to make decisions within the law.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-26 16:45:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188134554705580032
Reply addressees: @directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187996037635608576
IN REPLY TO:
@directdemocrac7
@curtdoolittle @JohnMarkSays Curt, I have many questions…
What is the structure of Govt?
Is there voting?
Is there a need for lawyers?
Who leads the jury? What’s a “judge”?
How is a crime reported & processed?
…
Can voice chat, if you have the patience 🙂
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187996037635608576