Let’s see how much trouble I can start with this one. 😉
#Conservatives #conservative https://t.co/r0bVJRdjnz
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-08 22:00:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192924972869664770
Source: Twitter X
-
Let’s see how much trouble I can start with this one. 😉 #Conservatives #conserv
-
And you have secured a place in history that you may very likely wish to forget.
And you have secured a place in history that you may very likely wish to forget. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-08 21:59:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192924732812877826
Reply addressees: @NewYorkStateAG @delong
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192516480849629187
IN REPLY TO:
@NewYorkStateAG
BREAKING: We’ve secured a court order forcing President Trump to pay $2M in damages after admitting to illegally using the Trump Foundation to help him intervene in the 2016 presidential election and further his own political interests.
No one is above the law.Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192516480849629187
-
The Choice is Obvious
The Choice is Obvious https://t.co/erfQHvQH3o
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-08 21:54:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192923488471986176
-
(ouch. you went there didn’t you?)
(ouch. you went there didn’t you?)
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-08 21:50:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192922467540652032
Reply addressees: @YvesBurri
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192922061498462209
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192922061498462209
-
Um, well you know, that can’t be true right? We have to invent speech. You just
Um, well you know, that can’t be true right? We have to invent speech. You just aren’t disambiguating the noun(reality) from the verb (truth)
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-08 21:46:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192921457384476672
Reply addressees: @Nalo_Nei @FreePeterBiarM
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192920027764273158
IN REPLY TO:
@Nalo_Nei
@curtdoolittle @FreePeterBiarM I maintain Humans do not ‘invent’ Truth. We can invent lies and call them ‘truth’, but that’s an expression of human error—then we have created nothing but own confusion, not Truth.
We have created ways to understand and perceive Truth, but we don’t create Truth itselfOriginal post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192920027764273158
-
Consumption of Material goods(consumerism), Consumption of Chemical goods (drugs
Consumption of Material goods(consumerism),
Consumption of Chemical goods (drugs, alcohol), Consumption of Hedonism (sex, food),
Consumption of Fantasy (religion, mysticism)
They are how the enemy baits the weak into moral hazard, profits from it, and destroys all from within.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-08 21:15:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192913580838002688
Reply addressees: @EricLiford
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192909991067496448
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192909991067496448
-
Is math a fictionalism, or is mathematical platonism (mathematical realism) a fi
Is math a fictionalism, or is mathematical platonism (mathematical realism) a fictionalism?
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-08 21:12:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192912789238681601
Reply addressees: @Nalo_Nei @FreePeterBiarM
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192911513809375232
IN REPLY TO:
@Nalo_Nei
@curtdoolittle @FreePeterBiarM I disagree that math is a ‘fictionalism’.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192911513809375232
-
Did we invent the novel?
Did we invent the novel?
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-08 21:11:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192912666551095297
Reply addressees: @Nalo_Nei @FreePeterBiarM
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192912203952771072
IN REPLY TO:
@Nalo_Nei
@curtdoolittle @FreePeterBiarM Do you believe we ‘invented’ math?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192912203952771072
-
So where you want to understand, i want to prevent lying – lying on the industri
So where you want to understand, i want to prevent lying – lying on the industrialized scale that was invented in the 20th century and used against our people every single day.
Hence, my work with and concern for precision: the prevention of deceit. -cheers 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-08 21:11:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192912606853500928
Reply addressees: @Nalo_Nei @FreePeterBiarM
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192912254985015297
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Nalo_Nei @FreePeterBiarM Meaning is one thing(contract for reconstruction of experience) warranty another (limiting errors from transferred meaning), negotiation, argument(persuasion), and deceit (disinformation). Most of philosophy takes place in presumption of positives. I do law. I presume negatives.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1192912254985015297
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Nalo_Nei @FreePeterBiarM Meaning is one thing(contract for reconstruction of experience) warranty another (limiting errors from transferred meaning), negotiation, argument(persuasion), and deceit (disinformation). Most of philosophy takes place in presumption of positives. I do law. I presume negatives.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1192912254985015297
-
Meaning is one thing(contract for reconstruction of experience) warranty another
Meaning is one thing(contract for reconstruction of experience) warranty another (limiting errors from transferred meaning), negotiation, argument(persuasion), and deceit (disinformation). Most of philosophy takes place in presumption of positives. I do law. I presume negatives.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-08 21:10:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192912254985015297
Reply addressees: @Nalo_Nei @FreePeterBiarM
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192911783784308736
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Nalo_Nei @FreePeterBiarM In other words, if there is a way to transfer meaning (associations sufficient for reconstruction of experience) by informing any human faculty, we have invented it – and yes I have produced a chart of all of them: deflationary, descriptive, inflationary, and deceptive. 😉
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1192911783784308736
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Nalo_Nei @FreePeterBiarM In other words, if there is a way to transfer meaning (associations sufficient for reconstruction of experience) by informing any human faculty, we have invented it – and yes I have produced a chart of all of them: deflationary, descriptive, inflationary, and deceptive. 😉
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1192911783784308736