RT @curtdoolittle: @Steve_Adema @sapinker As far as I know every one of these is false: https://t.co/HJLAQxKmWc
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-21 17:25:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197566720485023744
Source: Twitter X
-
RT @curtdoolittle: @Steve_Adema @sapinker In other words, (a) false promise to p
RT @curtdoolittle: @Steve_Adema @sapinker In other words, (a) false promise to people by the sophism that harms are declining (they aren’t)…
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-21 17:25:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197566613979045890
-
RT @curtdoolittle: @Steve_Adema @sapinker All Steven is saying is what every oth
RT @curtdoolittle: @Steve_Adema @sapinker All Steven is saying is what every other economist says: harms are NOT decreasing, it’s just that…
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-21 17:25:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197566602105032709
-
RT @curtdoolittle: @Steve_Adema @sapinker This is the problem with the left of c
RT @curtdoolittle: @Steve_Adema @sapinker This is the problem with the left of center “Pseudo -Intellectual’ public intellectuals: They pro…
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-21 17:24:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197566586720260096
-
Nixon shouldn’t have resigned. McCarthy shouldn’t have stopped. Trump should con
Nixon shouldn’t have resigned. McCarthy shouldn’t have stopped. Trump should continue to expose the conspiracy of common interest against his election.
Something you might sense, but we are going to correct rather … aggressively, in the coming year or so.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-21 17:22:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197566070397243393
Reply addressees: @ezraklein
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197563397664956417
IN REPLY TO:
@ezraklein
Resolved: With this Republican Party, Nixon would never have been forced to resign, and there wouldn’t have been the votes to convict in the Senate.
Does anyone disagree? If so, why?Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197563397664956417
-
As far as I know every one of these is false
As far as I know every one of these is false: https://t.co/HJLAQxKmWc
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-21 17:18:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197565059909726209
Reply addressees: @Steve_Adema @sapinker
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197560942931972103
IN REPLY TO:
@Steve_Adema
@curtdoolittle @sapinker Pinker never tries to claim ‘net harms’ are declining. I don’t even know how one could even approach trying to measure something so expansive. Collecting historical data for violent deaths seemed hard enough, let alone getting nuanced data like non-physical harm.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197560942931972103
-
He makes a claim about human nature – that’s false
He makes a claim about human nature – that’s false.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-21 17:16:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197564500033069056
Reply addressees: @Steve_Adema @sapinker
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197560942931972103
IN REPLY TO:
@Steve_Adema
@curtdoolittle @sapinker Pinker never tries to claim ‘net harms’ are declining. I don’t even know how one could even approach trying to measure something so expansive. Collecting historical data for violent deaths seemed hard enough, let alone getting nuanced data like non-physical harm.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197560942931972103
-
How would you (Pinker) warranty that statement if you were held liable for it? I
How would you (Pinker) warranty that statement if you were held liable for it? Isn’t most propaganda and deceit distributed under the premise of presumption of innocence in intent?
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-21 17:12:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197563353868230656
Reply addressees: @Steve_Adema @sapinker
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197562714165563392
IN REPLY TO:
@Steve_Adema
@curtdoolittle @sapinker I don’t think Pinker’s scope for violence is as misleading as you seem to. He doesn’t avoid or hide the new challenges we face and also warns against extrapolating and making predictions from the data he uses.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197562714165563392
-
WOMEN’S MENTAL ILLNESS is more common than male violence
WOMEN’S MENTAL ILLNESS is more common than male violence.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-21 17:11:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197563135525343234
Reply addressees: @CalebJHull
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197541926523809792
IN REPLY TO:
@CalebJHull
I can’t stop laughing at how pathetic leftist “activists” are…
She gets so triggered by someone literally just standing there with an opposing view that she attacks him and claims he “sacrificed her safety.”
Incredible. https://t.co/yHkIwMCTPgOriginal post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197541926523809792
-
Shrilling, or being a ‘shrill’ was illegal in most of our history A woman could
Shrilling, or being a ‘shrill’ was illegal in most of our history A woman could be publicly punished for it. Our mistake was Free Speech rather than truthful, reciprocal, and disciplined speech. They never imagined we’d do away with the Duel, or Publicly beating Shrills/Gossips.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-21 17:10:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197563028918722567
Reply addressees: @EricLiford
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197552872306749446
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197552872306749446