THE SUCCESS OF THE WESTERN ORDER
In the Western tradition we are all members of a vast army fulfilling our duties because of accidents of time and space. We all are due respect no matter our… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=554662151797346&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-14 17:50:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217141983011057669
People take the bait every time.
Seriously.
K.O.T.H. Rocks.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-14 17:44:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217140466631806976
And that is why chimpmunks fall for it. Because the FALSE PROMISE of consensus is achieved by suggestion, not by falsification.
What is the limit of “property”?
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-14 17:43:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217140198385094657
Reply addressees: @DeplorableDJDJ
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217139510473109504
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@DeplorableDJDJ .. UPB like all libertarian (half truths), does not state the limit of property, whereas reciprocity does: all demonstrated interests. Note that UPB like rothbardianism doesn’t state the limit. This is why every junior chipmunk agrees with it by suggestion not by testing.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1217139510473109504
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@DeplorableDJDJ .. UPB like all libertarian (half truths), does not state the limit of property, whereas reciprocity does: all demonstrated interests. Note that UPB like rothbardianism doesn’t state the limit. This is why every junior chipmunk agrees with it by suggestion not by testing.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1217139510473109504
.. UPB like all libertarian (half truths), does not state the limit of property, whereas reciprocity does: all demonstrated interests. Note that UPB like rothbardianism doesn’t state the limit. This is why every junior chipmunk agrees with it by suggestion not by testing.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-14 17:40:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217139510473109504
Reply addressees: @DeplorableDJDJ
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217139151885213697
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@DeplorableDJDJ Because man is demonstrably amoral, and chooses moral (reciprocity) action or immoral (irreciprocal) action to the maximum of his net benefit.
Furthermore….
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1217139151885213697
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@DeplorableDJDJ Because man is demonstrably amoral, and chooses moral (reciprocity) action or immoral (irreciprocal) action to the maximum of his net benefit.
Furthermore….
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1217139151885213697
Because man is demonstrably amoral, and chooses moral (reciprocity) action or immoral (irreciprocal) action to the maximum of his net benefit.
Furthermore….
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-14 17:39:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217139151885213697
Reply addressees: @DeplorableDJDJ
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217138938642681857
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@DeplorableDJDJ In other words, while Reciprocity is always decidable, it is not DEMONSTRABLY true we prefer reciprocity. It’s demonstrably true we avoid irreciprocity tolerate reciprocity and aggressively pursue rent seeking.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1217138938642681857
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@DeplorableDJDJ In other words, while Reciprocity is always decidable, it is not DEMONSTRABLY true we prefer reciprocity. It’s demonstrably true we avoid irreciprocity tolerate reciprocity and aggressively pursue rent seeking.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1217138938642681857
In other words, while Reciprocity is always decidable, it is not DEMONSTRABLY true we prefer reciprocity. It’s demonstrably true we avoid irreciprocity tolerate reciprocity and aggressively pursue rent seeking.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-14 17:38:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217138938642681857
Reply addressees: @DeplorableDJDJ
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217138567740297223
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@DeplorableDJDJ Second, that man organizes, so people organize in pursuit of free riding, rent seeking, and socialization of losses MORE than they do for reciprocity. Again, suppressed by markets for suppression of irreciprocity: court and law.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1217138567740297223
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@DeplorableDJDJ Second, that man organizes, so people organize in pursuit of free riding, rent seeking, and socialization of losses MORE than they do for reciprocity. Again, suppressed by markets for suppression of irreciprocity: court and law.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1217138567740297223
Second, that man organizes, so people organize in pursuit of free riding, rent seeking, and socialization of losses MORE than they do for reciprocity. Again, suppressed by markets for suppression of irreciprocity: court and law.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-14 17:37:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217138567740297223
Reply addressees: @DeplorableDJDJ
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217138291679596546
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@DeplorableDJDJ I think you’re missing my point. It’s that the market demand for irreciprocal behavior has required incremental suppression under the law of tort (property) paid for by exchange of local rents and friction for centralization of fees (taxes) and lowering friction+higher velocity.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1217138291679596546
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@DeplorableDJDJ I think you’re missing my point. It’s that the market demand for irreciprocal behavior has required incremental suppression under the law of tort (property) paid for by exchange of local rents and friction for centralization of fees (taxes) and lowering friction+higher velocity.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1217138291679596546
I think you’re missing my point. It’s that the market demand for irreciprocal behavior has required incremental suppression under the law of tort (property) paid for by exchange of local rents and friction for centralization of fees (taxes) and lowering friction+higher velocity.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-14 17:35:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217138291679596546
Reply addressees: @DeplorableDJDJ
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217121944845332480
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217121944845332480
RT @ironpatriot2016: @curtdoolittle @JohnMarkSays @realDonaldTrump @seanhannity @SebGorka #BREAKING #BreakingNews https://t.co/uez7tFBCA6
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-14 16:28:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217121341763194881
Which means absolutely nothing. If we gave out the same (10k) randomly every week to .0000001% of the population that would tell us nothing about UBI – which will simply mean increases in rents for landlords, as they’ll capture almost all of it.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-14 16:27:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217121191766450181
Reply addressees: @voxdotcom @yousuck2020
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217120221204570112
IN REPLY TO:
@voxdotcom
Japanese billionaire Yusaku Maezawa (@yousuck2020) plans to give away 1 billion Japanese yen — about $9 million — to 1,000 random Twitter followers this week. https://t.co/g6239G25Ds
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217120221204570112