Same position. Dysgenics is far worse than eugenics. https://twitter.com/MartianHoplite/status/1229151129856028677
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-16 21:21:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229153958184308739
https://twitter.com/MartianHoplite/status/1229151129856028677
Dedicated to @MartianHoplite 😉
(The technical Name for Eli-Harmanism) https://t.co/aJVrtkpOYE
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-16 21:18:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229153096460382214
She didn’t make a claim about genetics. She made a claim about the ethics of eugenics.
Try not to be stupid in public. It wastes other people’s time.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-16 21:15:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229152331498954752
Reply addressees: @nathan_a_tanner
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229150360381644800
RK: I don’t really want to push back on this post because besides being true, it’s serving a good purpose. But… the open question is “composition vs expression”: whether the coincidence of phenotypic traits(neoteny) and class traits (load) are related. The baby-crib test works.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-16 20:36:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229142606644424705
Reply addressees: @gnxp_posts
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1228857921175355392
I’m pretty sure I know more about the demarcation between science, non-science, pseudoscience, and sophistry than anyone living. And that includes the criteria for making scientific (testimonial) claims.
So no.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-16 20:24:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229139590725935109
Reply addressees: @nathan_a_tanner
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229121360024293379
(Correct)
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-16 17:29:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229095356828442625
Reply addressees: @DesperateDanX @BaileInis @drjulie_b @stoicmel
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1228993447740268545
Economics (in the Beckerian tradition) should be required to get any degree and any pretense of conception of what ‘ethics’ means.
People like you are a cancer for mankind.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-16 17:26:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229094784603754506
Reply addressees: @drjulie_b
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229094516377997312
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@drjulie_b So go read bio-ethics yourself. Not propaganda. Not marxist, feminist, postmodernist pseudoscience and sophistry.
What is the human cost of reversing thousands of years of soft eugenics by taxation and credit expansion in the middle to profit the top and expand the bottom?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1229094516377997312
So go read bio-ethics yourself. Not propaganda. Not marxist, feminist, postmodernist pseudoscience and sophistry.
What is the human cost of reversing thousands of years of soft eugenics by taxation and credit expansion in the middle to profit the top and expand the bottom?
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-16 17:25:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229094516377997312
Reply addressees: @drjulie_b
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229094235783258113
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@drjulie_b We have lost a full standard deviation of intelligence above the Hajnal Line in the past 150 years due to reversal. We’re just about to cross the line of 97 in the USA, and evidence is that 95 and 93 are cliff effects that are unrecoverable. That’s before personality trait diffs.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1229094235783258113
We have lost a full standard deviation of intelligence above the Hajnal Line in the past 150 years due to reversal. We’re just about to cross the line of 97 in the USA, and evidence is that 95 and 93 are cliff effects that are unrecoverable. That’s before personality trait diffs.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-16 17:24:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229094235783258113
Reply addressees: @drjulie_b
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1228972722061021184
Soft eugenics, by manorialism (land allocation), financialism (credit allocation), and hanging (europe) and beheading (east asia) are the reason for the success of our two civilizations – with european rule of law of property defeating chinese bureaucracy in adaptive velocity.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-16 17:22:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229093745401966593
Reply addressees: @drjulie_b
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1228951074981195777