Exactly. 😉 -hugs brother.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-06 22:04:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1236050091485650944
Reply addressees: @jamesfoxhiggins @90_guillem @NoahRevoy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1236049420531027968
I mean, women are sold the false promise of many things – and so are men. Monogamy with a majority genetic middle class with insufficient productivity to survive without children and family is a thing of the past. We are done with agrarianism. So what is going to happen?
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-06 21:37:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1236043243541979137
Reply addressees: @90_guillem
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1236041815381487617
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@90_guillem And yes, (e) the expected results mean that we have returned to the HISTORICAL NORM where 1/3 under monogamy, 2/3 under poverty, and as few as 1 in 17 men during prehistory have access to sex.
So – if you want to fix the problem fix men (product) fix incentives (markets).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1236041815381487617
These men are de facto, by the evidence, not of sufficient quality that women will defer other consumption in order to consume those men. Claiming they are of sufficient quality is simply demonstrably false. Fix men (product) or fix the incentives (market). Latter is easier.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-06 21:33:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1236042255070384130
Reply addressees: @90_guillem
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1236041339260882944
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@90_guillem I am saying that (a) people in general are having a lot less sex for reasons we understand, (b) women no longer need men for economic support or reproduction, ( c) incentives (education, taxes, immigration pressure) are hostile to marriage, (d) this is producing expected results.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1236041339260882944
And yes, (e) the expected results mean that we have returned to the HISTORICAL NORM where 1/3 under monogamy, 2/3 under poverty, and as few as 1 in 17 men during prehistory have access to sex.
So – if you want to fix the problem fix men (product) fix incentives (markets).
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-06 21:31:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1236041815381487617
Reply addressees: @90_guillem
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1236041339260882944
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@90_guillem I am saying that (a) people in general are having a lot less sex for reasons we understand, (b) women no longer need men for economic support or reproduction, ( c) incentives (education, taxes, immigration pressure) are hostile to marriage, (d) this is producing expected results.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1236041339260882944
I am saying that (a) people in general are having a lot less sex for reasons we understand, (b) women no longer need men for economic support or reproduction, ( c) incentives (education, taxes, immigration pressure) are hostile to marriage, (d) this is producing expected results.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-06 21:29:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1236041339260882944
Reply addressees: @90_guillem
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1235986567392620545
The only reason immigration into european countries is happening is USA’s flood of money and military into the system that props up the virtue signal capacity of the rest of european civilization. That’s ending very,very, soon. And tribalism will increase exponentially in duress.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-06 21:10:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1236036415017926656
Reply addressees: @WalterJ02130480 @DuchesneRicardo
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1236035596310609921
Two men in agreement on everything? 😉 Tim has a lot of talent, works hard, and produces excellent content every day. We’d need a topic, and that topic I think would need to be (a) what do solutions look like (b) what will the right and center ‘buy’, and (c) how do we get there?
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-06 21:07:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1236035775009099782
Reply addressees: @The_Biker_Bear @Timcast
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1236014519580647424
(This is a good question by the way it just requires a long answer to fully explain.)
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-06 21:02:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1236034344973742080
Reply addressees: @90_guillem
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1235917418435837954
When women complain about working with males they’re complaining (aggression) about men’s use of dominance expression while not complaining about women’s use of dominance expression (undermining).
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-06 21:01:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1236034212525981696
Reply addressees: @party_blanket @90_guillem
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1235982603683074049
Of course we can. Are you demanding restitution? 😉
I like that idea. lol
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-06 21:00:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1236034002873716736
Reply addressees: @TruthRespecter
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1235987424112791552