(worth repeating) https://t.co/jNTrYMeQph
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-29 13:36:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1255491185294147589
Source: Twitter X
-
I have battle on all sides. nazis/wn’s on one end, antifa/socialists on the othe
I have battle on all sides. nazis/wn’s on one end, antifa/socialists on the other, christians/fundamentalists, Civic nationalists…. I do my thing.
Maybe it’s time to convert my main feed to read only and create a private forum for discussions by topic.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-28 18:06:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1255196635262595073
Reply addressees: @mutedilettante
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1255124068862357507
-
That’s not the point. How do we get to GAI?
That’s not the point. How do we get to GAI?
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-28 18:03:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1255195972629643266
Reply addressees: @LLaddon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1255165033526550529
-
Now just as in databases and oop, we have standardized design patterns and made
Now just as in databases and oop, we have standardized design patterns and made minor improvements, but these fail to overcome the limitations of the model. We use AI to categorize inputs (sensory inputs) but there is no ‘intelligence’ to it at all.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-28 15:11:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1255152785370251264
Reply addressees: @LLaddon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1255152234872082432
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@LLaddon That’s simply not true. There has been little theoretical improvement since the 50’s, and we have done little other than take advantage of Moore’s law. When I got out of AI in the 80’s it was obvious that we simply couldn’t do any better at 4mhz in 64k of RAM.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1255152234872082432
-
That’s simply not true. There has been little theoretical improvement since the
That’s simply not true. There has been little theoretical improvement since the 50’s, and we have done little other than take advantage of Moore’s law. When I got out of AI in the 80’s it was obvious that we simply couldn’t do any better at 4mhz in 64k of RAM.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-28 15:09:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1255152234872082432
Reply addressees: @LLaddon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1255133523121324034
-
THE HARDWARE PROBLEM LIMITING AI Yep. The problem is the entire industry is buil
THE HARDWARE PROBLEM LIMITING AI
Yep. The problem is the entire industry is built for central computation limited by frequency (heat) rather than distributed association and prediction limited only by numbers(cool) – and what we need is billions of trivial circuits whose pr… https://t.co/sqJQ8LxB0t
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-28 13:44:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1255130809117208578
-
(A great deal of my work is devoted to prohibiting false irreciprocal, and false
(A great deal of my work is devoted to prohibiting false irreciprocal, and false-promissory speech, so that politicians public intellectual and media are liable for their words.)
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-28 13:06:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1255121088150941697
Reply addressees: @mutedilettante
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1255118876976676865
-
Adage: “Better to be silent in public and thought a fool rather than speak and r
Adage: “Better to be silent in public and thought a fool rather than speak and remove all doubt”. Inverse: ‘Better to argue honestly in private with other fools and add to one’s doubts, than fail to argue, and retain them.”
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-28 12:54:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1255118197453398018
Reply addressees: @mutedilettante
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1255114665434071040
-
No. He does just fine without my help. 😉
No. He does just fine without my help. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-28 12:36:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1255113707216134144
Reply addressees: @mutedilettante
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1255111922849996800
-
GRID EXPLAINING COMMONS-ISM GRID: ……………………CHILD……………..
GRID EXPLAINING COMMONS-ISM
GRID:
……………………CHILD……………………….
ANARCHIST …….VS ….COMMUNIST
(heterogeneous, no commons, just consumption)
(diasporic, tribal, imperial subjects, “the men will do it”)
no capitalization ………no capitaliz… https://t.co/HXCy1VvKkI
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-28 12:16:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1255108725964247040