Thank you brother. Let’s fight the good fight until we prevail.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-02 05:17:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1995724004477239575
Thank you brother. Let’s fight the good fight until we prevail.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-02 05:17:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1995724004477239575
Love you man but I don’t see it. If you mean for the median and bottom possibly. If you mean for results then it’s easily demonstrable what the differences are.
For those of us that solve hard problems there is openai and that’s about it.
I am proud of Deepseek and Google both for lighting the fires of competition. I agree that open source is an accelerator. I agree that in the end foundation models are a commodity. But until we solve the three major remaining problems (our org has solved one, and has insights into the second) then we are still in the early stages.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-02 05:16:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1995723715745906821
I love engineers. Almost everyone else is silly by comparison. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-02 05:11:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1995722530489868395
Women are awesome. Its just that empathizing doesnt scale. So women’s instinct and intuition is politically counterproductive.
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-30 21:46:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1995248052995838274
It’s just recursion. It’s expensive. Otherwise everyone would do it. But yes, thank you for sharing and in the future pls continue. 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-30 08:53:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1995053670929690910
THE CHALLENGE OF PITCHING RUNCIBLE TO FOUNDATION TEAMS
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-30 02:39:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1994959356727890079
Yes. Female sense making does not scale beyond the social group.
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-29 23:29:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1994911516488077440
Testimony
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-29 23:17:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1994908534501511279
John Adams did use the term “reciprocity” in his writings, though primarily in diplomatic, political, and legal contexts rather than as a standalone moral principle.
For instance, in letters discussing treaties and alliances, he emphasized reciprocity as mutual equality, such as in alliances with France on “Terms of perfect Equality and Reciprocity” or in trade negotiations where he argued for “true Reciprocity” in liberties and rights between nations.
He also applied it to social contract ideas, like the reciprocal nature of protection and allegiance, noting that when protection is withdrawn, allegiance dissolves.
These uses align with Enlightenment-era notions of balanced obligations but do not directly frame reciprocity as a synonym for ethics or morality in the way modern philosopher.
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-29 23:01:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1994904658280923339
This is why I love and admire you J. This is better than I am capable of myself. I keep looking for someone who can carry the torch and you keep showing up with the embers. Thanks for all you do.
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-29 19:35:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1994852723515408549